The Ministry of Education has introduced wide-ranging educational reform measures in recent years. Course content and teaching methods have changed, as have the systems for gaining entry to both senior high school and college.
As a result, the pressure on students has increased, forcing them to attend more cram schools. They even have to haggle over every point at their regular schools. But their aca-demic ability has deteriorated. The much-publicized "Constructive Mathematics" for elementary school students, for example, has been severely criticized recently because teachers and parents have found that stu-dents' ability in mathematics has declined. Meanwhile, the new Diversified Enrollment Scheme is unfair to the poor. First-year junior high school English textbooks are so difficult that students who cannot afford to attend language schools may simply not stand a chance. In such circumstances, fairness in education is eliminated.
As of this year, the Nine-Year Educational Program -- which aims to integrate elementary and high school systems -- is being applied to the first year of junior high school. Although all subjects have been integrated into seven major categories, teachers still follow the old method and teach them separately. Otherwise, they simply wouldn't be able to complete their duties under the new program. Chemistry teachers, for example, can't teach biology courses because they are not biologists. According to a newspaper report, one school requires all art teachers to teach music. As a consequence, one art teacher who didn't know how to teach music had no choice but to take an extended period of leave. A child cannot relive his or her childhood and teenage years if mistakes occur. Today's parents can do nothing when their children are treated like guinea pigs.
What are the ideals of education reform? What are the educational goals? What needs to be changed and how? Not only parents and students but also teachers and scholars are unclear about these questions.
What, moreover, is the theoretical basis for the way reform has been implemented? Was thorough research conducted before the system was introduced? Or was it just introduced as a result of arbitrary decision making? If the reforms were based on a comprehensive design, why has the college application process this year been a big mess? Why have the new Basic Competency Tests for junior high school students become yet another gigantic joint entrance examination? Why have the enrollment schemes broadened the gap between rich and poor? Why have students' abilities in mathematics and Chinese declined, and college students lost their enthusiasm for learning?
The ministry is the department in charge of education reforms. The brilliant suggestions of scholars will come to nothing if the ministry doesn't take them into consideration. The ministry should be held responsible for the success or failure of reforms. Its reform policy, affecting the futures of countless students, is a major aspect of public policy and should be opened to discussion. Once the policy has been made, the government should clearly inform us of its ideals and goals and the reason for adopting such methods. Only when it does can the public work together toward the ideals and goals of education reforms and examine the appropriateness and effectiveness of reform plans.
As education reforms are often questioned, it is to be hoped that the government will adopt a more cautious and open approach to introducing reforms that have a major bearing on the nation's future.
Shen Mei-chen is a lawyer.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Labubu, an elf-like plush toy with pointy ears and nine serrated teeth, has become a global sensation, worn by celebrities including Rihanna and Dua Lipa. These dolls are sold out in stores from Singapore to London; a human-sized version recently fetched a whopping US$150,000 at an auction in Beijing. With all the social media buzz, it is worth asking if we are witnessing the rise of a new-age collectible, or whether Labubu is a mere fad destined to fade. Investors certainly want to know. Pop Mart International Group Ltd, the Chinese manufacturer behind this trendy toy, has rallied 178 percent
My youngest son attends a university in Taipei. Throughout the past two years, whenever I have brought him his luggage or picked him up for the end of a semester or the start of a break, I have stayed at a hotel near his campus. In doing so, I have noticed a strange phenomenon: The hotel’s TV contained an unusual number of Chinese channels, filled with accents that would make a person feel as if they are in China. It is quite exhausting. A few days ago, while staying in the hotel, I found that of the 50 available TV channels,
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou City, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
There is no such thing as a “silicon shield.” This trope has gained traction in the world of Taiwanese news, likely with the best intentions. Anything that breaks the China-controlled narrative that Taiwan is doomed to be conquered is welcome, but after observing its rise in recent months, I now believe that the “silicon shield” is a myth — one that is ultimately working against Taiwan. The basic silicon shield idea is that the world, particularly the US, would rush to defend Taiwan against a Chinese invasion because they do not want Beijing to seize the nation’s vital and unique chip industry. However,
RSS