The Ministry of Education has introduced wide-ranging educational reform measures in recent years. Course content and teaching methods have changed, as have the systems for gaining entry to both senior high school and college.
As a result, the pressure on students has increased, forcing them to attend more cram schools. They even have to haggle over every point at their regular schools. But their aca-demic ability has deteriorated. The much-publicized "Constructive Mathematics" for elementary school students, for example, has been severely criticized recently because teachers and parents have found that stu-dents' ability in mathematics has declined. Meanwhile, the new Diversified Enrollment Scheme is unfair to the poor. First-year junior high school English textbooks are so difficult that students who cannot afford to attend language schools may simply not stand a chance. In such circumstances, fairness in education is eliminated.
As of this year, the Nine-Year Educational Program -- which aims to integrate elementary and high school systems -- is being applied to the first year of junior high school. Although all subjects have been integrated into seven major categories, teachers still follow the old method and teach them separately. Otherwise, they simply wouldn't be able to complete their duties under the new program. Chemistry teachers, for example, can't teach biology courses because they are not biologists. According to a newspaper report, one school requires all art teachers to teach music. As a consequence, one art teacher who didn't know how to teach music had no choice but to take an extended period of leave. A child cannot relive his or her childhood and teenage years if mistakes occur. Today's parents can do nothing when their children are treated like guinea pigs.
What are the ideals of education reform? What are the educational goals? What needs to be changed and how? Not only parents and students but also teachers and scholars are unclear about these questions.
What, moreover, is the theoretical basis for the way reform has been implemented? Was thorough research conducted before the system was introduced? Or was it just introduced as a result of arbitrary decision making? If the reforms were based on a comprehensive design, why has the college application process this year been a big mess? Why have the new Basic Competency Tests for junior high school students become yet another gigantic joint entrance examination? Why have the enrollment schemes broadened the gap between rich and poor? Why have students' abilities in mathematics and Chinese declined, and college students lost their enthusiasm for learning?
The ministry is the department in charge of education reforms. The brilliant suggestions of scholars will come to nothing if the ministry doesn't take them into consideration. The ministry should be held responsible for the success or failure of reforms. Its reform policy, affecting the futures of countless students, is a major aspect of public policy and should be opened to discussion. Once the policy has been made, the government should clearly inform us of its ideals and goals and the reason for adopting such methods. Only when it does can the public work together toward the ideals and goals of education reforms and examine the appropriateness and effectiveness of reform plans.
As education reforms are often questioned, it is to be hoped that the government will adopt a more cautious and open approach to introducing reforms that have a major bearing on the nation's future.
Shen Mei-chen is a lawyer.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
Taiwanese pragmatism has long been praised when it comes to addressing Chinese attempts to erase Taiwan from the international stage. “Taipei” and the even more inaccurate and degrading “Chinese Taipei,” imposed titles required to participate in international events, are loathed by Taiwanese. That is why there was huge applause in Taiwan when Japanese public broadcaster NHK referred to the Taiwanese Olympic team as “Taiwan,” instead of “Chinese Taipei” during the opening ceremony of the Tokyo Olympics. What is standard protocol for most nations — calling a national team by the name their country is commonly known by — is impossible for
China’s supreme objective in a war across the Taiwan Strait is to incorporate Taiwan as a province of the People’s Republic. It follows, therefore, that international recognition of Taiwan’s de jure independence is a consummation that China’s leaders devoutly wish to avoid. By the same token, an American strategy to deny China that objective would complicate Beijing’s calculus and deter large-scale hostilities. For decades, China has cautioned “independence means war.” The opposite is also true: “war means independence.” A comprehensive strategy of denial would guarantee an outcome of de jure independence for Taiwan in the event of Chinese invasion or
A recent Taipei Times editorial (“A targeted bilingual policy,” March 12, page 8) questioned how the Ministry of Education can justify spending NT$151 million (US$4.74 million) when the spotlighted achievements are English speech competitions and campus tours. It is a fair question, but it focuses on the wrong issue. The problem is not last year’s outcomes failing to meet the bilingual education vision; the issue is that the ministry has abandoned the program that originally justified such a large expenditure. In the early years of Bilingual 2030, the ministry’s K-12 Administration promoted the Bilingual Instruction in Select Domains Program (部分領域課程雙語教學實施計畫).
Former Fijian prime minister Mahendra Chaudhry spoke at the Yushan Forum in Taipei on Monday, saying that while global conflicts were causing economic strife in the world, Taiwan’s New Southbound Policy (NSP) serves as a stabilizing force in the Indo-Pacific region and offers strategic opportunities for small island nations such as Fiji, as well as support in the fields of public health, education, renewable energy and agricultural technology. Taiwan does not have official diplomatic relations with Fiji, but it is one of the small island nations covered by the NSP. Chaudhry said that Fiji, as a sovereign nation, should support
RSS