The Ministry of Education has introduced wide-ranging educational reform measures in recent years. Course content and teaching methods have changed, as have the systems for gaining entry to both senior high school and college.
As a result, the pressure on students has increased, forcing them to attend more cram schools. They even have to haggle over every point at their regular schools. But their aca-demic ability has deteriorated. The much-publicized "Constructive Mathematics" for elementary school students, for example, has been severely criticized recently because teachers and parents have found that stu-dents' ability in mathematics has declined. Meanwhile, the new Diversified Enrollment Scheme is unfair to the poor. First-year junior high school English textbooks are so difficult that students who cannot afford to attend language schools may simply not stand a chance. In such circumstances, fairness in education is eliminated.
As of this year, the Nine-Year Educational Program -- which aims to integrate elementary and high school systems -- is being applied to the first year of junior high school. Although all subjects have been integrated into seven major categories, teachers still follow the old method and teach them separately. Otherwise, they simply wouldn't be able to complete their duties under the new program. Chemistry teachers, for example, can't teach biology courses because they are not biologists. According to a newspaper report, one school requires all art teachers to teach music. As a consequence, one art teacher who didn't know how to teach music had no choice but to take an extended period of leave. A child cannot relive his or her childhood and teenage years if mistakes occur. Today's parents can do nothing when their children are treated like guinea pigs.
What are the ideals of education reform? What are the educational goals? What needs to be changed and how? Not only parents and students but also teachers and scholars are unclear about these questions.
What, moreover, is the theoretical basis for the way reform has been implemented? Was thorough research conducted before the system was introduced? Or was it just introduced as a result of arbitrary decision making? If the reforms were based on a comprehensive design, why has the college application process this year been a big mess? Why have the new Basic Competency Tests for junior high school students become yet another gigantic joint entrance examination? Why have the enrollment schemes broadened the gap between rich and poor? Why have students' abilities in mathematics and Chinese declined, and college students lost their enthusiasm for learning?
The ministry is the department in charge of education reforms. The brilliant suggestions of scholars will come to nothing if the ministry doesn't take them into consideration. The ministry should be held responsible for the success or failure of reforms. Its reform policy, affecting the futures of countless students, is a major aspect of public policy and should be opened to discussion. Once the policy has been made, the government should clearly inform us of its ideals and goals and the reason for adopting such methods. Only when it does can the public work together toward the ideals and goals of education reforms and examine the appropriateness and effectiveness of reform plans.
As education reforms are often questioned, it is to be hoped that the government will adopt a more cautious and open approach to introducing reforms that have a major bearing on the nation's future.
Shen Mei-chen is a lawyer.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
In 1976, the Gang of Four was ousted. The Gang of Four was a leftist political group comprising Chinese Communist Party (CCP) members: Jiang Qing (江青), its leading figure and Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) last wife; Zhang Chunqiao (張春橋); Yao Wenyuan (姚文元); and Wang Hongwen (王洪文). The four wielded supreme power during the Cultural Revolution (1966-1976), but when Mao died, they were overthrown and charged with crimes against China in what was in essence a political coup of the right against the left. The same type of thing might be happening again as the CCP has expelled nine top generals. Rather than a
Former Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmaker Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) on Saturday won the party’s chairperson election with 65,122 votes, or 50.15 percent of the votes, becoming the second woman in the seat and the first to have switched allegiance from the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) to the KMT. Cheng, running for the top KMT position for the first time, had been termed a “dark horse,” while the biggest contender was former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), considered by many to represent the party’s establishment elite. Hau also has substantial experience in government and in the KMT. Cheng joined the Wild Lily Student
When Taiwan High Speed Rail Corp (THSRC) announced the implementation of a new “quiet carriage” policy across all train cars on Sept. 22, I — a classroom teacher who frequently takes the high-speed rail — was filled with anticipation. The days of passengers videoconferencing as if there were no one else on the train, playing videos at full volume or speaking loudly without regard for others finally seemed numbered. However, this battle for silence was lost after less than one month. Faced with emotional guilt from infants and anxious parents, THSRC caved and retreated. However, official high-speed rail data have long
Taipei stands as one of the safest capital cities the world. Taiwan has exceptionally low crime rates — lower than many European nations — and is one of Asia’s leading democracies, respected for its rule of law and commitment to human rights. It is among the few Asian countries to have given legal effect to the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant of Social Economic and Cultural Rights. Yet Taiwan continues to uphold the death penalty. This year, the government has taken a number of regressive steps: Executions have resumed, proposals for harsher prison sentences
RSS