The International Democrat Union (IDU) meeting three years ago was held in Berlin and the city's mayor gave a dinner party for participants in the City Hall. This year the IDU meet in Wash-ington and delegates were guests at a White House dinner hosted by US President George W. Bush. And while most of the political party leaders attending the meeting three years ago were in the opposition in their countries, many of them have since won elections, such as those from the US, Norway, Spain, Denmark, Sri Lanka, Portugal and Australia.
Only a handful of them -- such as KMT Chairman Lien Chan (
Hence, the former leader of the UK's Conservative Party, William Hague, who also served as chairman of the IDU for the past three years, said rightists around the world were making progress and predicted that the future belongs to the Right.
The past decade was an era of left-of-center parties. Former US president Bill Clinton, British Prime Minister Tony Blair, German Chancellor Gerhard Schroeder and former French prime minister Lionel Jospin appear to have become the four pillars of left-of-center rule. But now two of the pillars have fallen and the "third way" is going out of fashion. Right-of-center parties finally have a reason to celebrate. In Washing-ton, Lien and Smith both expressed their firm determination to snatch back political power.
However, blind faith in the "pendulum theory" or global trends cannot bring them back to power. Moreover, every nation faces a different situation. Just because Bush was successful does not necessarily mean Lien or Smith can be. Jospin's weaknesses are not necessarily the same as Blair's or President Chen Shui-bian's (陳水扁). The KMT and the British Conservative Party are daydreaming if they think they can ride the world trend to victory.
The Conservative Party lost power because it had been
positioned as -- or had performed like -- a "party in the past tense." When the majority of British voters were concerned about public services, Conservatives were harping on about the sovereignty problem involved in the launch of the euro. The party's policies did not reflect the public's needs.
Only after a second defeat to the Labour Party last year did the Conservative Party finally learn its lesson. First, the party had to forget its glorious history and second, it had to echo the voice of the general public. Smith recently started speaking out for the weak and adopted more caring policies. A think tank was set up to transform the party. These are the concrete actions stemming from the lessons the Conservatives have learned.
Hague even called on Conservative Party members to fight the Labour Party on its own turf. He obviously intends to learn from Blair's success and create a "New Conservative Party."
When left-of-center parties got the upper hand in the 1990s, they labeled themselves as the "new Left" to differentiate themselves from the traditional Left. Clinton said he was a New Democrat and Blair said he was from the New Labor Party. But what is new in the new Left is not just slogans or party images, but also policies and platforms. Similarly, the right-of-center parties have risen recently under the banner of the new Right. Bush's "Compassionate Conservatism" is the "third way" of his Republican Party.
Although Taiwan's political arena is not divided into Left and Right, the KMT is facing a situation very similar to the Conservatives in the UK. After attending the IDU meeting, Lien and Smith apparently felt the momentum of a great leap forward for the Right. But whether or not the Conservatives can transform into a "New Conservative Party" and the KMT into a "New KMT" will be crucial tests for the two leaders.
Otherwise, in the words of a British commentator, the Washington IDU meeting would be, at best, a "collective psychotherapy" for those rightist party leaders who lost power.
Wang Chien-chuang is president of The Journalist magazine.
Translated by Jackie Lin
Wherever one looks, the United States is ceding ground to China. From foreign aid to foreign trade, and from reorganizations to organizational guidance, the Trump administration has embarked on a stunning effort to hobble itself in grappling with what his own secretary of state calls “the most potent and dangerous near-peer adversary this nation has ever confronted.” The problems start at the Department of State. Secretary of State Marco Rubio has asserted that “it’s not normal for the world to simply have a unipolar power” and that the world has returned to multipolarity, with “multi-great powers in different parts of the
President William Lai (賴清德) recently attended an event in Taipei marking the end of World War II in Europe, emphasizing in his speech: “Using force to invade another country is an unjust act and will ultimately fail.” In just a few words, he captured the core values of the postwar international order and reminded us again: History is not just for reflection, but serves as a warning for the present. From a broad historical perspective, his statement carries weight. For centuries, international relations operated under the law of the jungle — where the strong dominated and the weak were constrained. That
The Executive Yuan recently revised a page of its Web site on ethnic groups in Taiwan, replacing the term “Han” (漢族) with “the rest of the population.” The page, which was updated on March 24, describes the composition of Taiwan’s registered households as indigenous (2.5 percent), foreign origin (1.2 percent) and the rest of the population (96.2 percent). The change was picked up by a social media user and amplified by local media, sparking heated discussion over the weekend. The pan-blue and pro-China camp called it a politically motivated desinicization attempt to obscure the Han Chinese ethnicity of most Taiwanese.
The Legislative Yuan passed an amendment on Friday last week to add four national holidays and make Workers’ Day a national holiday for all sectors — a move referred to as “four plus one.” The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), who used their combined legislative majority to push the bill through its third reading, claim the holidays were chosen based on their inherent significance and social relevance. However, in passing the amendment, they have stuck to the traditional mindset of taking a holiday just for the sake of it, failing to make good use of
RSS