The shining hope of a new millennium lies in ruins, buried beneath the debris of the World Trade Center towers, and a new generation is called to defend civilization from a foe bent on its destruction.
As the coalition to put an end to terrorism begins to build, China is seeking to push its skewed view of human rights as the only legitimate one, portraying the harsh crackdowns on civil liberties that have become its hallmark as fully justified.
Beijing's strategy for taking advantage of last week's tragedy is two-fold.
First, it seeks to win the world's acquiescence in its harsh treatment of Xinjiang's Muslim separatists, the beleaguered Tibetan minority in the west, and, more importantly, to force Washington to deny Taiwan the means to defend herself in return for China's support of the anti-terrorist coalition.
Second, and for the long term, it seeks to win the much larger debate over the freedom of the individual.
Always thinking ahead, Bei-jing sees this entire episode as an opportunity to win carte blanche from the international community to continue to treat its own citizens as part of a mindless collective. The Chinese Communist Party is well aware that free-thinking people are a threat to its stranglehold on political power.
In Beijing's view, anyone who questions China's xenophobic, one-party state must be done away with -- and the terrorist attacks last week on the beacon of democracy are to be used to legitimize that effort by exploiting the West's new-found vulnerability -- its now evolving crisis of security.
This is one of the mine fields of the emerging period of history. It will be a challenge to modern civilization to maintain civil liberties and freedoms in the face of the now all too evident terrorist foe.
China will try and persuade the free peoples of the world that stifling dissent, limiting freedom of information, freedom of movement, freedom of the press, freedom of religion has been justified all along, and that the democracies should follow suit for the sake of their own security.
This we must not do.
The terrorist attacks last week were attacks on a way of life that Beijing continues to oppose. The irony that China is seeking to turn the battle against global terrorism into further justification for the abuse of its own citizens must not be lost on policy makers around the world when they seek Beijing's support.
Unless China chooses to participate on the basis that innocent people should not be slaughtered for the sake of making a political statement, then the world should let Beijing stew on the sidelines as the freedom-loving people of the world defend their hard-won liberty without its help.
Will Mittler is a freelance writer based in Taipei.
China has not been a top-tier issue for much of the second Trump administration. Instead, Trump has focused considerable energy on Ukraine, Israel, Iran, and defending America’s borders. At home, Trump has been busy passing an overhaul to America’s tax system, deporting unlawful immigrants, and targeting his political enemies. More recently, he has been consumed by the fallout of a political scandal involving his past relationship with a disgraced sex offender. When the administration has focused on China, there has not been a consistent throughline in its approach or its public statements. This lack of overarching narrative likely reflects a combination
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The
For nearly eight decades, Taiwan has provided a home for, and shielded and nurtured, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT). After losing the Chinese Civil War in 1949, the KMT fled to Taiwan, bringing with it hundreds of thousands of soldiers, along with people who would go on to become public servants and educators. The party settled and prospered in Taiwan, and it developed and governed the nation. Taiwan gave the party a second chance. It was Taiwanese who rebuilt order from the ruins of war, through their own sweat and tears. It was Taiwanese who joined forces with democratic activists
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) held a news conference to celebrate his party’s success in surviving Saturday’s mass recall vote, shortly after the final results were confirmed. While the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) would have much preferred a different result, it was not a defeat for the DPP in the same sense that it was a victory for the KMT: Only KMT legislators were facing recalls. That alone should have given Chu cause to reflect, acknowledge any fault, or perhaps even consider apologizing to his party and the nation. However, based on his speech, Chu showed
RSS