Just as the national Economic Development Advisory Conference was beginning to have an impact on the current political situation, Vice President Annette Lu (呂秀蓮) bluntly criticized its consensus on cross-strait economic and trade policy. A short time later, President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) lashed out at the environmental impact assessment process while touring a factory.
The blunders that the nation's two top leaders have made with their outspoken criticism have further damaged the government's image. Disturbingly, their comments were not mere slips of the tongue, but rather are related to their attitudes and policy stances, indicating the damage might therefore be more serious than the surface wounds suggest.
When economic alarm bells rang after Chen took office last year, he came up with a policy of giving priority to economic development and postponing social welfare programs. When the economy rapidly worsened, Chen announced that the government would make an all-out effort to salvage it.
With the economic slowdown as a backdrop, it is understandable that the authorities concerned should work hard to solve our economic problems. But if the government -- for the sake of the economy -- sacrifices environmental protection, social welfare and even social justice, people will simply become all the more disillusioned with the DPP government.
The public can understand that the vice president serves as a spokeswoman for specific policies or stances. The public would also be inclined to show respect when the vice president puts forward her views on policy.
But Lu usually fails to act with propriety and thus triggers disputes. She not only hurts others and the government, but also herself. Often, Lu seems to forget that she is the vice president and freely criticizes the government. She has even said that everything she does and says follows her conscience, meaning that no one but she is right. She also said that those in power must have the courage to face history and their consciences. It's almost as though she is in an opposition party and is the only one with a conscience.
Indeed, Lu is perhaps most confused about whether she is in power or a member of the opposition. At the recent 2001 Global Peace Assembly, Lu, in her official status, insisted on playing a leading role in non-governmental activities and thus became the focus of criticism.
Lu has also promoted the formation of the National Union of Taiwanese Women (
In a diverse society during a democratic era, the president should transcend all specific interest groups and protect the rights and interests of all people. The DPP has long promoted social reforms and social justice and should not sacrifice everything for the sake of the economy.
Although she has no substantive power, the vice president can only win the public's respect by choosing her words wisely. More importantly, both the president and vice president must carefully manage their relations with the private sector. Although that sector and the government do not have to be antagonistic toward one another, the nation's top two leaders have to respect majority rights and interests at the grassroots level and should not interfere in NGOs.
Chiu Hei-yuan is a professor in the Department of Sociology at National Taiwan University. Translated by Jackie Lin
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
Within Taiwan’s education system exists a long-standing and deep-rooted culture of falsification. In the past month, a large number of “ghost signatures” — signatures using the names of deceased people — appeared on recall petitions submitted by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) against Democratic Progressive Party legislators Rosalia Wu (吳思瑤) and Wu Pei-yi (吳沛憶). An investigation revealed a high degree of overlap between the deceased signatories and the KMT’s membership roster. It also showed that documents had been forged. However, that culture of cheating and fabrication did not just appear out of thin air — it is linked to the
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
RSS