Just as the national Economic Development Advisory Conference was beginning to have an impact on the current political situation, Vice President Annette Lu (呂秀蓮) bluntly criticized its consensus on cross-strait economic and trade policy. A short time later, President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) lashed out at the environmental impact assessment process while touring a factory.
The blunders that the nation's two top leaders have made with their outspoken criticism have further damaged the government's image. Disturbingly, their comments were not mere slips of the tongue, but rather are related to their attitudes and policy stances, indicating the damage might therefore be more serious than the surface wounds suggest.
When economic alarm bells rang after Chen took office last year, he came up with a policy of giving priority to economic development and postponing social welfare programs. When the economy rapidly worsened, Chen announced that the government would make an all-out effort to salvage it.
With the economic slowdown as a backdrop, it is understandable that the authorities concerned should work hard to solve our economic problems. But if the government -- for the sake of the economy -- sacrifices environmental protection, social welfare and even social justice, people will simply become all the more disillusioned with the DPP government.
The public can understand that the vice president serves as a spokeswoman for specific policies or stances. The public would also be inclined to show respect when the vice president puts forward her views on policy.
But Lu usually fails to act with propriety and thus triggers disputes. She not only hurts others and the government, but also herself. Often, Lu seems to forget that she is the vice president and freely criticizes the government. She has even said that everything she does and says follows her conscience, meaning that no one but she is right. She also said that those in power must have the courage to face history and their consciences. It's almost as though she is in an opposition party and is the only one with a conscience.
Indeed, Lu is perhaps most confused about whether she is in power or a member of the opposition. At the recent 2001 Global Peace Assembly, Lu, in her official status, insisted on playing a leading role in non-governmental activities and thus became the focus of criticism.
Lu has also promoted the formation of the National Union of Taiwanese Women (
In a diverse society during a democratic era, the president should transcend all specific interest groups and protect the rights and interests of all people. The DPP has long promoted social reforms and social justice and should not sacrifice everything for the sake of the economy.
Although she has no substantive power, the vice president can only win the public's respect by choosing her words wisely. More importantly, both the president and vice president must carefully manage their relations with the private sector. Although that sector and the government do not have to be antagonistic toward one another, the nation's top two leaders have to respect majority rights and interests at the grassroots level and should not interfere in NGOs.
Chiu Hei-yuan is a professor in the Department of Sociology at National Taiwan University. Translated by Jackie Lin
Two major Chinese Communist Party (CCP)-People’s Liberation Army (PLA) power demonstrations in November 2024 highlight the urgency for Taiwan to pursue a military buildup and deterrence agenda that can take back control of its destiny. First, the CCP-PLA’s planned future for Taiwan of war, bloody suppression, and use as a base for regional aggression was foreshadowed by the 9th and largest PLA-Russia Joint Bomber Exercise of Nov. 29 and 30. It was double that of previous bomber exercises, with both days featuring combined combat strike groups of PLA Air Force and Russian bombers escorted by PLAAF and Russian fighters, airborne early warning
On Tuesday, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) issued a statement criticizing Song Siyao (宋思瑤), a student from Shanghai’s Fudan University, saying she had offended the sensibilities of Taiwanese. It also called for the Ma Ying-jeou Foundation — established by former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) — which had organized the tour group, to remind group members to be careful with their statements. Song, during a visit to a baseball stadium in Taichung, said that the tour group “would like to congratulate China, Taipei team (中國台北隊) ... we wish mainland China and Taiwan compatriots can be like the team Chinatrust Brothers and
For three years and three months, Taiwan’s bid to join the Comprehensive and Progressive Agreement for Trans-Pacific Partnership (CPTPP) has remained stalled. On Nov. 29, members meeting in Vancouver agreed to establish a working group for Costa Rica’s entry — the fifth applicant in line — but not for Taiwan. As Taiwan’s prospects for CPTPP membership fade due to “politically sensitive issues,” what strategy should it adopt to overcome this politically motivated economic exclusion? The situation is not entirely dim; these challenges offer an opportunity to reimagine the export-driven country’s international trade strategy. Following the US’ withdrawal from the Trans-Pacific Partnership
“Integrated Diplomacy” (總和外交) is the guiding principle of Taiwan’s current foreign policy. It seeks to mobilize technology, capital and talent for global outreach, strengthening Taiwan’s international connections. However, without a robust information security mechanism, such efforts risk being reduced to superficial courtesy calls. Security clearance serves as the “entrance examination results” for government agency personnel in sensitive positions, qualifying them to access sensitive information. Senior aides in the US Congress must also possess security clearance to assist lawmakers in handling classified budgets. However, security clearance is not an automatic right or a blanket necessity for accessing sensitive information. Access is granted only
RSS