US Representative David Wu
US Secretary of State Colin Powell and National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice have not been friendly either, but China has eagerly invited them to visit Beijing in the hope they might change their minds after having a good stay, some good meals and some good fun. Jesse Helms, chairman of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, has repeatedly declined Beijing's invitations to visit. Helms, who is known for his anti-communist stance, believes he does not have to visit Beijing in order to understand China.
It was surprising that China stopped Wu, someone who actually wanted to visit, from visiting.
The Beijing authorities have always encouraged overseas Chinese to return to their roots. China threw a grand reception for the governor of Washington State, Gary Locke
So why didn't Beijing welcome Wu, whose parents both hail from Suzhou and who once helped Portland establish sister-city relations with Suzhou?
Perhaps China blocked Wu's visit because he has been very firm on American values. Wu arrived in the US when he was six-and-a-half years old. He graduated from Yale University's law school, and also has a good understanding of China and Taiwan. Beijing can't possibly buy him off by just letting him visit.
Beijing's dissatisfaction with Wu can be traced to a number of issues. Last year, he was one of a few representatives who opposed the proposal to grant Permanent Normal Trade Relations (PNTR) status to China, even though the House of Representatives passed the bill by a strong majority. For his opposition, Beijing attacked him time and time again, stopping just short of calling him a "collaborator." Pro-China people also vowed not to vote for him, but Wu managed to win re-election anyway.
Wu has explained why he voted against PNTR. He is not against raising the Chinese people's standard of living, but he insists that economic solutions are not a cure-all, and that moral factors also need to be taken into account. Wu believes that good things never come automatically in China, but rather that they come only after relentless effort.
Wu has also criticized China for politicizing trade. He believes that when the Beijing authorities come to the US to buy 50,000 tons of wheat, they try to split the purchase into small portions to buy friends in three different regions. Wu believes these are political, not economic, activities.
Unfortunately, Taiwanese businessmen who have close ties to Beijing do not understand this point. Or perhaps they do understand but pretend not to.
Wheat is not the only commodity that Beijing tries to politicize. China has threatened US aircraft manufacturer Boeing, saying they would switch purchases to the European consortium, Airbus. They have done the same to Airbus, saying they would switch to Boeing. Beijing has pitted the two corporations against each other so that they will exert pressure on their governments to stop them from criticizing China's misdeeds.
It is precisely due to his good understanding of China that Wu holds a highly favorable view of the political transition in Taiwan. Wu also believes that Chinese genes are not incompatible with modern democratic politics. As a result, he has shown special concern for Taiwan's development and security.
Wu believes former president Bill Clinton's "three no's" policy was based on an inadequate understanding of the two sides of the Taiwan Strait. He also believes the primary emphasis at present should be on maintaining the status quo. That was why Wu jointly proposed the Taiwan Security Enhancement Act along with Republican caucus whip in the House, Tom DeLay.
Wu also supports weapons sales to Taiwan and the lifting of restrictions on Taiwan government officials visiting the US.
Wu was recently elected to chair the Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus. The caucus has 25 members and occupies an influential position in Congress. It is hoped that Wu will gain a better understanding of Taiwan from his visit, and that he will further promote relations between Taiwan and the US.
Paul Lin is a political commentator based in New York.
Translated by Francis Huang
The White House’s decision to take a 9.9 percent stake in Intel Corp is looking like very shrewd business indeed. Since the government bought in at US$20.47 a share last August, the US chipmaker’s surging stock price has delivered the US a US$43 billion return. One of the reasons the investment has so far proved so sound is that the White House has made sure of it. According to The Wall Street Journal, Howard personally pushed deals on Intel’s behalf with some of the most lucrative clients imaginable. They include Nvidia Corp, the company at the heart of the AI
A single photograph can cut through a lot of noise, but it can also be used to misrepresent the truth. At the very least, it can concentrate the mind on something that requires further investigation. On Monday last week, Ma Ying-jeou Foundation CEO Tai Hsia-ling (戴遐齡) and former National Security Council secretary-general King Pu-tsung (金溥聰) held a news conference in which they showed a photograph of former foundation CEO Hsiao Hsu-tsen (蕭旭岑), now Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) deputy chairman. In the image Hsiao is seated next to Xiamen Taiwan Businessmen Association chairman Han Ying-huan (韓螢煥). The two men were holding
I first met Professor Ray Jiing (井迎瑞) as a film and documentary student at Shih Hsin University’s (SHU) Department of Radio Television and Film in 1988. The following year, he went on to become the director of the Chinese Taipei Film Archive — forerunner of the Taiwan Film and Audiovisual Institute (TFAI). Over his eight-year tenure, Jiing rescued and restored over 200 classic Taiwanese films. In 1997, he established the Graduate Institute of Studies in Documentary and Film Archiving at Tainan National University of the Arts (TNNUA), and I joined the program in his third cohort of students. Beyond a
A recent report concerning a student who is suing his teacher posed the question in its headline: Does failing a student in two subjects constitute bullying? The college student in Chiayi County apparently sought NT$2 million (US$63,603) in state compensation, but a court dismissed the case. The first reaction of many might have been to ask: What has happened to students nowadays? Some say that teachers have lost their authority, while others say students are overindulged. Some even start reminiscing over the days when “whatever the teacher says goes.” However, the real issue might be overlooked if emotional reactions like that are the