US Representative David Wu
US Secretary of State Colin Powell and National Security Adviser Condoleezza Rice have not been friendly either, but China has eagerly invited them to visit Beijing in the hope they might change their minds after having a good stay, some good meals and some good fun. Jesse Helms, chairman of the Senate Committee on Foreign Relations, has repeatedly declined Beijing's invitations to visit. Helms, who is known for his anti-communist stance, believes he does not have to visit Beijing in order to understand China.
It was surprising that China stopped Wu, someone who actually wanted to visit, from visiting.
The Beijing authorities have always encouraged overseas Chinese to return to their roots. China threw a grand reception for the governor of Washington State, Gary Locke
So why didn't Beijing welcome Wu, whose parents both hail from Suzhou and who once helped Portland establish sister-city relations with Suzhou?
Perhaps China blocked Wu's visit because he has been very firm on American values. Wu arrived in the US when he was six-and-a-half years old. He graduated from Yale University's law school, and also has a good understanding of China and Taiwan. Beijing can't possibly buy him off by just letting him visit.
Beijing's dissatisfaction with Wu can be traced to a number of issues. Last year, he was one of a few representatives who opposed the proposal to grant Permanent Normal Trade Relations (PNTR) status to China, even though the House of Representatives passed the bill by a strong majority. For his opposition, Beijing attacked him time and time again, stopping just short of calling him a "collaborator." Pro-China people also vowed not to vote for him, but Wu managed to win re-election anyway.
Wu has explained why he voted against PNTR. He is not against raising the Chinese people's standard of living, but he insists that economic solutions are not a cure-all, and that moral factors also need to be taken into account. Wu believes that good things never come automatically in China, but rather that they come only after relentless effort.
Wu has also criticized China for politicizing trade. He believes that when the Beijing authorities come to the US to buy 50,000 tons of wheat, they try to split the purchase into small portions to buy friends in three different regions. Wu believes these are political, not economic, activities.
Unfortunately, Taiwanese businessmen who have close ties to Beijing do not understand this point. Or perhaps they do understand but pretend not to.
Wheat is not the only commodity that Beijing tries to politicize. China has threatened US aircraft manufacturer Boeing, saying they would switch purchases to the European consortium, Airbus. They have done the same to Airbus, saying they would switch to Boeing. Beijing has pitted the two corporations against each other so that they will exert pressure on their governments to stop them from criticizing China's misdeeds.
It is precisely due to his good understanding of China that Wu holds a highly favorable view of the political transition in Taiwan. Wu also believes that Chinese genes are not incompatible with modern democratic politics. As a result, he has shown special concern for Taiwan's development and security.
Wu believes former president Bill Clinton's "three no's" policy was based on an inadequate understanding of the two sides of the Taiwan Strait. He also believes the primary emphasis at present should be on maintaining the status quo. That was why Wu jointly proposed the Taiwan Security Enhancement Act along with Republican caucus whip in the House, Tom DeLay.
Wu also supports weapons sales to Taiwan and the lifting of restrictions on Taiwan government officials visiting the US.
Wu was recently elected to chair the Congressional Asian Pacific American Caucus. The caucus has 25 members and occupies an influential position in Congress. It is hoped that Wu will gain a better understanding of Taiwan from his visit, and that he will further promote relations between Taiwan and the US.
Paul Lin is a political commentator based in New York.
Translated by Francis Huang
Since the end of the Cold War, the US-China espionage battle has arguably become the largest on Earth. Spying on China is vital for the US, as China’s growing military and technological capabilities pose direct challenges to its interests, especially in defending Taiwan and maintaining security in the Indo-Pacific. Intelligence gathering helps the US counter Chinese aggression, stay ahead of threats and safeguard not only its own security, but also the stability of global trade routes. Unchecked Chinese expansion could destabilize the region and have far-reaching global consequences. In recent years, spying on China has become increasingly difficult for the US
Lately, China has been inviting Taiwanese influencers to travel to China’s Xinjiang region to make films, weaving a “beautiful Xinjiang” narrative as an antidote to the international community’s criticisms by creating a Potemkin village where nothing is awry. Such manipulations appear harmless — even compelling enough for people to go there — but peeling back the shiny veneer reveals something more insidious, something that is hard to ignore. These films are not only meant to promote tourism, but also harbor a deeper level of political intentions. Xinjiang — a region of China continuously listed in global human rights reports —
The annual summit of East Asia and other events around the ASEAN summit in October and November every year have become the most important gathering of leaders in the Indo-Pacific region. This year, as Laos is the chair of ASEAN, it was privileged to host all of the ministerial and summit meetings associated with ASEAN. Besides the main summit, this included the high-profile East Asia Summit, ASEAN summits with its dialogue partners and the ASEAN Plus Three Summit with China, Japan and South Korea. The events and what happens around them have changed over the past 15 years from a US-supported, ASEAN-led
As it has striven toward superiority in most measures of the Asian military balance, China is now ready to challenge the undersea balance of power, long dominated by the United States, a decisive advantage crucial to its ability to deter blockade and invasion of Taiwan by the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). America expended enormous treasure to develop the technology, logistics, training, and personnel to emerge victorious in the Cold War undersea struggle against the former Soviet Union, and to remain superior today; the US is not used to considering the People’s Liberation Army Navy (PLAN)
RSS