The new Justice Minister Chen Ding-nan (陳定南), who has been given the responsibility of getting rid of "black-gold" politics, has run into a war of words with Wang Kuang-ru (王光宇), head of the ministry's Investigation Bureau (MJIB). Even though Premier Tang Fei (唐飛) came out to ease the "disharmony between ministries and bureaus," the two were still unwilling to shake hands in front of legislators and the media. The standoff has cast a pall over the prospects of the new government's crackdown on crime.
The justice ministry is one of the Investigation Bureau's supervisors, but not its real boss. Much of the MJIB's work is supervised by the National Security Bureau (NSB), while the portion of work that is key to the ministry -- cracking down on corruption, drugs and economic crimes -- is done by makeshift groups. Even though the MJIB's budget is listed under the justice ministry, the NSB has an even larger secret budget for it. In terms of money and power, the NSB looks more like the bureau's boss than the ministry.
In the past, poking their noses in the MJIB's affairs had caused the downfall of justice ministers -- the bureau's administrative superiors. Remember Hsiao Teng-tzang
Chen is a stubborn, idiosyncratic politician. As long as he believes he is in the right, he moves ahead without worrying about hurting other's feelings. That is one reason he has such strong public support for his crackdown on crime.
But now Chen seems to have stepped into the frying pan. Shaking up the investigative mechanism, fussing over the difficulties of directing the MJIB, tightening up the management of detention centers, all mean Chen has kept the people in the various agencies under him biting their nails. Their reluctance to support the new minister's policies have made Chen very much the Lone Ranger in the ministry. He only has public opinion and support to fall back on.
Sensing the hostility of Taiwan's intelligence agencies to him, Chen Shui-bian
We hope the latter will not turn out to be true. Chen Shui-bian, like many other Taiwanese, suffered under the "White Terror" inflicted by intelligence agencies. When he was a legislator, Chen had many proposals about ways to reform Taiwan's intelligence system. Now that he is in power, he should formulate a policy for these units that is different from his predecessors.
The problem with the MJIB lies not in its status, but in its ill-defined responsibilities and powers. Separating intelligence and law-enforcement work -- putting political surveillance personnel under the National Security Bureau and turning the MJIB into a specialized anti-crime agency -- will be the beginning of a more rational system.
The MJIB has operated in a highly centralized chain of command. All investigators have to seek approval of their every step from headquarters. Accusations that prosecutors have had difficulties directing MJIB personnel or that the bureau has "killed" cases are no surprise.
Putting the MJIB's crime-fighting units under prosecutors will simplify the command system. This is not only compatible with the spirit of the rule of law, but is also a prerequisite for making the MJIB more efficient.
Congratulations to China’s working class — they have officially entered the “Livestock Feed 2.0” era. While others are still researching how to achieve healthy and balanced diets, China has already evolved to the point where it does not matter whether you are actually eating food, as long as you can swallow it. There is no need for cooking, chewing or making decisions — just tear open a package, add some hot water and in a short three minutes you have something that can keep you alive for at least another six hours. This is not science fiction — it is reality.
A foreign colleague of mine asked me recently, “What is a safe distance from potential People’s Liberation Army (PLA) Rocket Force’s (PLARF) Taiwan targets?” This article will answer this question and help people living in Taiwan have a deeper understanding of the threat. Why is it important to understand PLA/PLARF targeting strategy? According to RAND analysis, the PLA’s “systems destruction warfare” focuses on crippling an adversary’s operational system by targeting its networks, especially leadership, command and control (C2) nodes, sensors, and information hubs. Admiral Samuel Paparo, commander of US Indo-Pacific Command, noted in his 15 May 2025 Sedona Forum keynote speech that, as
In a world increasingly defined by unpredictability, two actors stand out as islands of stability: Europe and Taiwan. One, a sprawling union of democracies, but under immense pressure, grappling with a geopolitical reality it was not originally designed for. The other, a vibrant, resilient democracy thriving as a technological global leader, but living under a growing existential threat. In response to rising uncertainties, they are both seeking resilience and learning to better position themselves. It is now time they recognize each other not just as partners of convenience, but as strategic and indispensable lifelines. The US, long seen as the anchor
Kinmen County’s political geography is provocative in and of itself. A pair of islets running up abreast the Chinese mainland, just 20 minutes by ferry from the Chinese city of Xiamen, Kinmen remains under the Taiwanese government’s control, after China’s failed invasion attempt in 1949. The provocative nature of Kinmen’s existence, along with the Matsu Islands off the coast of China’s Fuzhou Province, has led to no shortage of outrageous takes and analyses in foreign media either fearmongering of a Chinese invasion or using these accidents of history to somehow understand Taiwan. Every few months a foreign reporter goes to
RSS