Starting from the 2001 academic year elementary school students in the first to fourth grades will have to take two hours of classes a week on their mother tongue. Even though this justice is late in coming and the policy is imperfect, since the classes will be required for only four years, I am pleased to see that our educational system is beginning to touch upon the very essence of education and the natural human need to have pride in one's native language and the basics of one's culture.
One's first language best represents the family's ethics and sentiments, as well as mutual trust and care. It also acts as a person's spiritual parents and best represents the history and culture of a people. It is a priceless cultural treasure surpassing any political and economic benefits.
Based on this, the Hoklo and Hakka languages and the various Aboriginal languages should not be regarded solely as regional dialects. They should also be respected as common languages of Taiwan.
First language education should not be distorted and downplayed simply to satisfy one's native feelings. It should be a natural expression of humanity.
Many young people in Taiwan are taught to despise their mother languages, because these languages are seriously denigrated in their schools. However, outside the campuses, these languages are used widely in local communities. As a consequence, younger generations are taught to be disdainful toward their mother languages and their own communities.
Parents often feel dejected when their children cannot communicate with family members in their mother tongue. Several years ago, I heard a story that some elders of the Ami tribe (
The destruction of valuable cultural traits because of the failure of language education happens everywhere in our country. I don't know when this sort of absurd educational system -- which is totally against human needs -- will stop? Or where will it lead?
When taking mass transportation lately, what warms my heart is hearing announcements broadcast in different native languages -- in trains, airplanes or on Taipei's Mass Rapid Transit system. The feeling of belonging and respect are indescribable.
It goes beyond discussions about practical value or language as a tool of communication. In the train station or at the airport, announcements in one's mother tongues warms a traveler's heart. It is like the care and love received from one's parents or relatives.
What I would love to see in the future is teachers and students discussing schoolwork in their native languages on campus, in offices or in laboratories.
I look forward to the day when most people will be fluent in more than three languages spoken in Taiwan and I will be able to teach my course -- Microwave Engineering -- in Hakka, my mother tongue.
We expect first language classes to become compulsory not only in elementary and high schools, but for other courses such as social science and mathematics to be taught in mother languages as well, just like in other countries. (Some technical problems can be anticipated, but humanistic education is by no means a simple affair.)
At that point, schools and communities will be perfectly combined; all the mother languages and cultures will be well mixed. Then Taiwan will be really entitled to the name as "Formosa" -- a beautiful island.
Vong Juin-taht is a professor and chairman of the electronic engineering department at National Taiwan University of Science and Technology.
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
After Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) met Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in Beijing, most headlines referred to her as the leader of the opposition in Taiwan. Is she really, though? Being the chairwoman of the KMT does not automatically translate into being the leader of the opposition in the sense that most foreign readers would understand it. “Leader of the opposition” is a very British term. It applies to the Westminster system of parliamentary democracy, and to some extent, to other democracies. If you look at the UK right now, Conservative Party head Kemi Badenoch is
A Pale View of Hills, a movie released last year, follows the story of a Japanese woman from Nagasaki who moved to Britain in the 1950s with her British husband and daughter from a previous marriage. The daughter was born at a time when memories of the US atomic bombing of Nagasaki during World War II and anxiety over the effects of nuclear radiation still haunted the community. It is a reflection on the legacy of the local and national trauma of the bombing that ended the period of Japanese militarism. A central theme of the movie is the need, at
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on Friday used their legislative majority to push their version of a special defense budget bill to fund the purchase of US military equipment, with the combined spending capped at NT$780 billion (US$24.78 billion). The bill, which fell short of the Executive Yuan’s NT$1.25 trillion request, was passed by a 59-0 margin with 48 abstentions in the 113-seat legislature. KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), who reportedly met with TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) for a private meeting before holding a joint post-vote news conference, was said to have mobilized her
RSS