An overhaul of bank capital rules would be the most effective step that regulators could take to support climate action, a group of 50 sustainable finance experts said yesterday.
In a survey carried out by the non-profit Climate Safe Lending Network, academics, commercial banks, non-governmental organizations, investors and central banks were asked to rank 10 proposals for how financial regulation could be changed to boost climate efforts.
Respondents included the Bank of England, the European Central Bank and Spain’s Banco Bilbao Vizcaya Argentaria SA, as well as Boston Common Asset Management LLC and Amalgamated Bank in the US, and the UK’s Big Society Capital Ltd.
The proposal drawing the most support was for regulators to impose tougher rules around the amount of capital that banks need to keep as a buffer if they want to lend to companies responsible for emitting high levels of greenhouse gases.
At the moment, banks can lend to fossil-fuel companies relatively cheaply because the risk-weights applied to the lending do not take into account the systemic risks of doing so, the report said.
By making it more expensive to lend to these companies, banks would lower their exposure to the risk, build up capital buffers to absorb potential losses from any loan defaults and focus investment on other parts of the economy.
On a scale of 1 to 5 assessing the potential impact of the policy proposal, with 5 the highest, the survey respondents rated it 4.13, while the feasibility of its implementation was rated 0.3 on a scale of minus-1 to plus-1, with plus-1 most feasible.
“Stranded assets create a credit risk that is not captured by the current framework,” said Andrew Turvey, prudential risk director at Belmont Green Finance Ltd.
However, Sarah Breeden, executive director for UK deposit takers supervision at the Bank of England, said that more clarity was needed on the path of forward climate policy for the option to be more feasible.
“We would have better sight on how risks might arise and more data to support policy change,” she said.
The next most-backed proposal was for regulators to set out a clear framework for what it means to be compliant with reaching net-zero emissions by 2050, and in line with the goals of the 2015 Paris agreement.
“This is the type of guidance that could be a game changer,” Boston Common Asset Management managing director Lauren Compere said.
The proposal was ranked 4.0 on potential impact and 0.3 on feasibility.
CHIP RACE: Three years of overbroad export controls drove foreign competitors to pursue their own AI chips, and ‘cost US taxpayers billions of dollars,’ Nvidia said China has figured out the US strategy for allowing it to buy Nvidia Corp’s H200s and is rejecting the artificial intelligence (AI) chip in favor of domestically developed semiconductors, White House AI adviser David Sacks said, citing news reports. US President Donald Trump on Monday said that he would allow shipments of Nvidia’s H200 chips to China, part of an administration effort backed by Sacks to challenge Chinese tech champions such as Huawei Technologies Co (華為) by bringing US competition to their home market. On Friday, Sacks signaled that he was uncertain about whether that approach would work. “They’re rejecting our chips,” Sacks
NATIONAL SECURITY: Intel’s testing of ACM tools despite US government control ‘highlights egregious gaps in US technology protection policies,’ a former official said Chipmaker Intel Corp has tested chipmaking tools this year from a toolmaker with deep roots in China and two overseas units that were targeted by US sanctions, according to two sources with direct knowledge of the matter. Intel, which fended off calls for its CEO’s resignation from US President Donald Trump in August over his alleged ties to China, got the tools from ACM Research Inc, a Fremont, California-based producer of chipmaking equipment. Two of ACM’s units, based in Shanghai and South Korea, were among a number of firms barred last year from receiving US technology over claims they have
It is challenging to build infrastructure in much of Europe. Constrained budgets and polarized politics tend to undermine long-term projects, forcing officials to react to emergencies rather than plan for the future. Not in Austria. Today, the country is to officially open its Koralmbahn tunnel, the 5.9 billion euro (US$6.9 billion) centerpiece of a groundbreaking new railway that will eventually run from Poland’s Baltic coast to the Adriatic Sea, transforming travel within Austria and positioning the Alpine nation at the forefront of logistics in Europe. “It is Austria’s biggest socio-economic experiment in over a century,” said Eric Kirschner, an economist at Graz-based Joanneum
OPTION: Uber said it could provide higher pay for batch trips, if incentives for batching is not removed entirely, as the latter would force it to pass on the costs to consumers Uber Technologies Inc yesterday warned that proposed restrictions on batching orders and minimum wages could prompt a NT$20 delivery fee increase in Taiwan, as lower efficiency would drive up costs. Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi made the remarks yesterday during his visit to Taiwan. He is on a multileg trip to the region, which includes stops in South Korea and Japan. His visit coincided the release last month of the Ministry of Labor’s draft bill on the delivery sector, which aims to safeguard delivery workers’ rights and improve their welfare. The ministry set the minimum pay for local food delivery drivers at
RSS