A former engineer at the world’s largest contract chipmaker, Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電), was yesterday charged with stealing trade secrets.
The Hsinchu District Prosecutors’ Office charged the engineer, surnamed Hsu (徐), with breach of trust, as well as violation of the Trade Secrets Act (營業秘密法) for allegedly attempting to use 28-nanometer process technology at a Chinese company.
TSMC, the world’s largest pure foundry operator, said the engineer tendered his resignation in January, but before leaving it was discovered that he had made copies of company documents related to 28-nanometer process technology.
The technology features high performance and low power consumption, plus seamless integration with the company’s 28-nanometer design ecosystem to enable faster time-to-market operations.
After being confronted by company officials, Hsu allegedly admitted to the theft and the copied documents were recovered by the company.
Having violated the Trade Secrets Act and the terms of his TSMC contract, Hsu was fired and the case was turned over to police, prosecutors said.
Hsinchu prosecutors said the engineer visited Shanghai Huali Microelectronics Corp (HLMC, 華力微) in December last year, where it is alleged he leveraged the documents stolen from TSMC and accepted a job at the Chinese company.
TSMC said it would officially notify HLMC that if it is found using any stolen trade secrets the Taiwanese company would take legal action against it.
Zhang Yazhou was sitting in the passenger seat of her Tesla Model 3 when she said she heard her father’s panicked voice: The brakes do not work. Approaching a red light, her father swerved around two cars before plowing into a sport utility vehicle and a sedan, and crashing into a large concrete barrier. Stunned, Zhang gazed at the deflating airbag in front of her. She could never have imagined what was to come: Tesla Inc sued her for defamation for complaining publicly about the vehicles brakes — and won. A Chinese court ordered Zhang to pay more than US$23,000 in
Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) yesterday said that its investment plan in Arizona is going according to schedule, following a local media report claiming that the company is planning to break ground on its third wafer fab in the US in June. In a statement, TSMC said it does not comment on market speculation, but that its investments in Arizona are proceeding well. TSMC is investing more than US$65 billion in Arizona to build three advanced wafer fabs. The first one has started production using the 4-nanometer (nm) process, while the second one would start mass production using the
US President Donald Trump has threatened to impose up to 100 percent tariffs on Taiwan’s semiconductor exports to the US to encourage chip manufacturers to move their production facilities to the US, but experts are questioning his strategy, warning it could harm industries on both sides. “I’m very confused and surprised that the Trump administration would try and do this,” Bob O’Donnell, chief analyst and founder of TECHnalysis Research in California, said in an interview with the Central News Agency on Wednesday. “It seems to reflect the fact that they don’t understand how the semiconductor industry really works,” O’Donnell said. Economic sanctions would
‘NO DISRUPTION’: A US trade association said that it was ready to work with the US administration to streamline the program’s requirements and achieve shared goals The White House is seeking to renegotiate US CHIPS and Science Act awards and has signaled delays to some upcoming semiconductor disbursements, two sources familiar with the matter told reporters. The people, along with a third source, said that the new US administration is reviewing the projects awarded under the 2022 law, meant to boost US domestic semiconductor output with US$39 billion in subsidies. Washington plans to renegotiate some of the deals after assessing and changing current requirements, the sources said. The extent of the possible changes and how they would affect agreements already finalized was not immediately clear. It was not known