Voting for competence
As the outer rim of Typhoon Fengshen swept across northern Taiwan, bringing torrential rain in its wake, many feared that New Taipei City’s Sijhih District (汐止) would once again be flooded. Fortunately, it was spared as the Yuanshanzih (員山子) flood diversion in Rueifang District (瑞芳) — championed by the administration of former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) more than two decades ago and once ridiculed as a waste of money — quietly proved its worth once again.
The sluiceway has been tested and proven effective on multiple occasions.
When Typhoon Dujuan struck in September 2015, the water level at the diversion weir reached 66m, meaning that 932m3 of water a second that would have flowed down the Keelung River, including through Sijhih, was diverted directly into the Pacific Ocean.
Since the sluiceway’s completion in 2005, it has diverted floodwaters dozens of times, even setting a record of seven operations in a single year in 2017 that included three diversions within just 24 hours. The sluiceway stands as a testament to determination, foresight and excellence in engineering.
Similar policies were evident in former president Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) forward-looking infrastructure initiatives. The pipelines connecting the Zengwen Reservoir (曾文水庫) in Chiayi County and the Nanhua Reservoir (南化水庫) in Tainan allow the region flexibility in managing its water resources during water shortages and heavy rain. Coupled with dredging and increased storage capacity, southern Taiwan no longer has water shortages every year.
The projects quietly safeguard Taiwan through shortage and storm.
In contrast, repeated natural disasters in Hualien County have exposed chaos and mismanagement by the local government. All of the county government’s actions — from delayed reporting and falsified documents to neglecting and shirking responsibility toward the people affected by disasters — stem from selfishness and incompetence, and have caused Hualien residents to suffer.
Natural disasters are unavoidable; disasters caused by people are preventable. Elect the right leaders, and the public has a line of defense — elect the wrong ones, and storms serve as judgement.
True governance is not about photo opportunities after a disaster, but about establishing proper defenses before the wind rises. Forward-looking water management projects like the Yuanshanzih diversion are proof that if the right people are elected, they will do the right things.
Shih Li
Tainan
A gap appears to be emerging between Washington’s foreign policy elites and the broader American public on how the United States should respond to China’s rise. From my vantage working at a think tank in Washington, DC, and through regular travel around the United States, I increasingly experience two distinct discussions. This divergence — between America’s elite hawkishness and public caution — may become one of the least appreciated and most consequential external factors influencing Taiwan’s security environment in the years ahead. Within the American policy community, the dominant view of China has grown unmistakably tough. Many members of Congress, as
The Hong Kong government on Monday gazetted sweeping amendments to the implementation rules of Article 43 of its National Security Law. There was no legislative debate, no public consultation and no transition period. By the time the ink dried on the gazette, the new powers were already in force. This move effectively bypassed Hong Kong’s Legislative Council. The rules were enacted by the Hong Kong chief executive, in conjunction with the Committee for Safeguarding National Security — a body shielded from judicial review and accountable only to Beijing. What is presented as “procedural refinement” is, in substance, a shift away from
The shifting geopolitical tectonic plates of this year have placed Beijing in a profound strategic dilemma. As Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) prepares for a high-stakes summit with US President Donald Trump, the traditional power dynamics of the China-Japan-US triangle have been destabilized by the diplomatic success of Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi in Washington. For the Chinese leadership, the anxiety is two-fold: There is a visceral fear of being encircled by a hardened security alliance, and a secondary risk of being left in a vulnerable position by a transactional deal between Washington and Tokyo that might inadvertently empower Japan
After declaring Iran’s military “gone,” US President Donald Trump appealed to the UK, France, Japan and South Korea — as well as China, Iran’s strategic partner — to send minesweepers and naval forces to reopen the Strait of Hormuz. When allies balked, the request turned into a warning: NATO would face “a very bad” future if it refused. The prevailing wisdom is that Trump faces a credibility problem: having spent years insulting allies, he finds they would not rally when he needs them. That is true, but superficial, as though a structural collapse could be caused by wounded feelings. Something
RSS