After Jia Lin divorced 20 years ago, his wife got both house and son, leaving the Beijing cook with little more than a fresh start.
Stepping into the divorce registration office two decades later to retrieve his records, the stooped 51-year-old said the fate of his house could be very different now.
China’s top court issued a reinterpretation of the country’s divorce law this month, saying that the spouse who buys a house before marriage has the right to keep it after a split-up. Before, the property was usually divided equally between the two sides.
“Each side should get back what was his or hers beforehand,” Jia said. “I think that’s fair.”
However, many Chinese, especially women, disagree.
They say the new interpretation favors men, who traditionally buy the house in China, often before they marry. Critics also say the penalty for infidelity is now close to nil.
“Now the man doesn’t have to be responsible for what happens to the woman,” said Beijing resident Xu Weiqin, 40, who said her friend is being kicked out of her husband’s house in the midst of a divorce.
The new interpretation by the male-dominated Supreme People’s Court has stirred debate in a country where home ownership is particularly valued.
Chinese men are widely expected to own a house if they want to marry, so much so that a wedding sans house is called a “naked wedding.” Some parents now start a home-purchase fund for their child as soon as they know it is a boy.
“Parents who buy their children houses used to worry that their children’s divorces could result in the loss of family property,” court spokesman Sun Jungong said in a statement.
Unlike the top courts of common law countries, such as the US and the UK, which guide lower courts through decisions via precedent-setting cases, China’s top court sets law by issuing new interpretations.
In the days following the reinterpretation, women have scrambled to add their names to their husbands’ housing contracts, with the process for inking it becoming a most-discussed item on Chinese microblogging sites.
“I want to make sure I don’t end up in the street,” one female microblogger wrote.
Some men were worried, too, but for a different reason.
“My wife wants me to add her name to the housing certificate. What do I do?” one Chinese man asked on a microblogging site. “I should add that my wife feels money is very important, and has threatened to divorce me twice in the past over money.”
Once rare in China, divorce is now common, with about 5,000 couples deciding to call it quits each day. Although China’s divorce rate remains well below that of the US and the UK, the number of Chinese divorces has increased at an annual rate of 7.6 percent over the past eight years, according to data from the Ministry of Civil Affairs.
Despite the prevalence of divorce in China today, there is still some squeamishness about the topic.
For example, there is technically no “divorce registration office” at the Beijing civil affairs bureau. Happy couples line up hand-in-hand outside the “wedding registration office,” while unhappy ones slink into the similarly named “marriage registration office” down the hall.
On a recent weekday morning, Mr Jin, a 45-year-old businessman on his way to work in a dress shirt and carrying a briefcase, was at the marriage registration office to inquire about divorce proceedings.
“With the number of gold diggers these days, I can see why they have this reinterpretation,” said Jin, who declined to give his first name. “You hear all the time about people who just get married for money.”
He paused.
“But it does seem a bit unfair to women, doesn’t it?” he said.
China’s military news agency yesterday warned that Japanese militarism is infiltrating society through series such as Pokemon and Detective Conan, after recent controversies involving events at sensitive sites. In recent days, anime conventions throughout China have reportedly banned participants from dressing as characters from Pokemon or Detective Conan and prohibited sales of related products. China Military Online yesterday posted an article titled “Their schemes — beware the infiltration of Japanese militarism in culture and sports.” The article referenced recent controversies around the popular anime series Pokemon, Detective Conan and My Hero Academia, saying that “the evil influence of Japanese militarism lives on in
ANTI-SEMITISM: Some newsletters promote hateful ideas such as white supremacy and Holocaust denial, with one describing Adolf Hitler as ‘one of the greatest men of all time’ The global publishing platform Substack is generating revenue from newsletters that promote virulent Nazi ideology, white supremacy and anti-Semitism, a Guardian investigation has found. The platform, which says it has about 50 million users worldwide, allows members of the public to self-publish articles and charge for premium content. Substack takes about 10 percent of the revenue the newsletters make. About 5 million people pay for access to newsletters on its platform. Among them are newsletters that openly promote racist ideology. One, called NatSocToday, which has 2,800 subscribers, charges US$80 for an annual subscription, although most of its posts are available
GLORY FACADE: Residents are fighting the church’s plan to build a large flight of steps and a square that would entail destroying up to two blocks of homes Barcelona’s eternally unfinished Basilica de la Sagrada Familia has grown to become the world’s tallest church, but a conflict with residents threatens to delay the finish date for the monument designed more than 140 years ago. Swathed in scaffolding on a platform 54m above the ground, an enormous stone slab is being prepared to complete the cross of the central Jesus Christ tower. A huge yellow crane is to bring it up to the summit, which will stand at 172.5m and has snatched the record as the world’s tallest church from Germany’s Ulm Minster. The basilica’s peak will deliberately fall short of the
Venezuelan Nobel peace laureate Maria Corina Machado yesterday said that armed men “kidnapped” a close ally shortly after his release by authorities, following former Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro’s capture. The country’s Public Prosecutor’s Office confirmed later yesterday that former National Assembly vice president Juan Pablo Guanipa, 61, was again taken into custody and was to be put under house arrest, arguing that he violated the conditions of his release. Guanipa would be placed under house arrest “in order to safeguard the criminal process,” the office said in a statement. The conditions of Guanipa’s release have yet to be made public. Machado claimed that