The Beatles removed Mahatma Gandhi’s picture from the 1967 album cover of Sgt Pepper’s Lonely Hearts Club Band in case it upset Indians, but such restraint is now a thing of the past.
Today, Gandhi memorabilia is auctioned off in New York and London with his scant personal possessions attracting sky-high prices, while his image is used on pens, billboards and souvenirs.
“People want to buy every piece of history associated with the great man,” said Tushar Gandhi, the great-grandson of India’s independence leader. “Anything that comes with a ‘Gandhi’ tag sells, and India has not been able to protect the items belonging to the father of the nation.”
The auction in the US last year of Gandhi’s glasses, leather sandals, pocket watch, metal plate and bowl triggered a major public debate over exploitation of his memory.
The Indian government first tried to prevent the auction and then seemed ready to buy the items itself, before Indian industrialist and liquor baron Vijay Mallaya stepped in with a winning bid of US$1.8 million.
Indian-origin British businessmen Ghulam Noon and Nat Puri last year paid US$26,000 at an auction in London for letters written by Gandhi and a piece of cloth signed by him. They then handed the items over to India.
For many Indians the contrast is stark between Gandhi’s simple, anti-materialistic lifestyle and the commercial frenzy over his few belongings and saintly image.
In South Africa, a house where Gandhi lived sold last year to a French tourism company Voyageurs du Monde for US$377,000 — far above the norm for a small house with a thatched roof in Johannesburg.
Gandhi only occupied it for a few years, but the company is planning to open the building as a museum and guest house.
In one recent row, luxury brand Montblanc in February suspended sales in India of a “Gandhi” pen that cost US$25,000.
The limited-edition pen was launched to supposedly mark the anniversary of Gandhi’s 1930 protest march from Ahmedabad against British salt tax, a key episode in his non-violent campaign for independence.
Montblanc hoped that the pen “honoring” Gandhi would help it tap into India’s wealthiest brand-conscious consumers, but instead it ended up in court over laws that say government permission is needed to use Gandhi’s image.
The pen, which had an engraving of Gandhi on the nib, was withdrawn from sale and Montblanc issued an apology.
Contrastingly, there has been only a murmur of disapproval over billboards in New Delhi that show Mahatma Gandhi apparently in close conversation with Rahul Gandhi, the 39-year-old scion of the Nehru-Gandhi political dynasty, which has no relation to Mahatma Gandhi.
The photo-montage promotes a newspaper aimed at India’s expanding middle-class market.
India’s ministry of culture says it is preparing further legislation to prevent Gandhi’s belongings being traded for money and to protect his image from being misused.
“We want to pre-empt any auction of Gandhi items. Selling or buying these heritage articles should be illegal, but sadly most of the items have already changed hands,” an official said.
The reality is more complicated, Gandhi experts say.
“These modest objects have now become part of global economy and one should stop being hysterical about them,” said Tridip Suhrud, a Gandhian scholar from his home state of Gujarat.
“If India starts buying all collectibles of Gandhi then they will be forced to pick up relics of other leaders, freedom fighters and erstwhile kings. The list is long,” he said.
Gandhi often gifted his belongings to friends, family and even casual visitors, said Varsha Das, director of the National Gandhi Museum in New Delhi.
“The task of collecting all his items is impossible,” said Das, adding that Gandhi often wrote dozens of letters a day. “If people want to sell them and make money, then there is no way one can stop them.”
Das suggested that instead of chasing Gandhi items around the world, the government would be better to “preserve his real assets — non-violence and peace.”
With much pomp and circumstance, Cairo is today to inaugurate the long-awaited Grand Egyptian Museum (GEM), widely presented as the crowning jewel on authorities’ efforts to overhaul the country’s vital tourism industry. With a panoramic view of the Giza pyramids plateau, the museum houses thousands of artifacts spanning more than 5,000 years of Egyptian antiquity at a whopping cost of more than US$1 billion. More than two decades in the making, the ultra-modern museum anticipates 5 million visitors annually, with never-before-seen relics on display. In the run-up to the grand opening, Egyptian media and official statements have hailed the “historic moment,” describing the
‘CHILD PORNOGRAPHY’: The doll on Shein’s Web site measure about 80cm in height, and it was holding a teddy bear in a photo published by a daily newspaper France’s anti-fraud unit on Saturday said it had reported Asian e-commerce giant Shein (希音) for selling what it described as “sex dolls with a childlike appearance.” The French Directorate General for Competition, Consumer Affairs and Fraud Control (DGCCRF) said in a statement that the “description and categorization” of the items on Shein’s Web site “make it difficult to doubt the child pornography nature of the content.” Shortly after the statement, Shein announced that the dolls in question had been withdrawn from its platform and that it had launched an internal inquiry. On its Web site, Le Parisien daily published a
China’s Shenzhou-20 crewed spacecraft has delayed its return mission to Earth after the vessel was possibly hit by tiny bits of space debris, the country’s human spaceflight agency said yesterday, an unusual situation that could disrupt the operation of the country’s space station Tiangong. An impact analysis and risk assessment are underway, the China Manned Space Agency (CMSA) said in a statement, without providing a new schedule for the return mission, which was originally set to land in northern China yesterday. The delay highlights the danger to space travel posed by increasing amounts of debris, such as discarded launch vehicles or vessel
RUBBER STAMP? The latest legislative session was the most productive in the number of bills passed, but critics attributed it to a lack of dissenting voices On their last day at work, Hong Kong’s lawmakers — the first batch chosen under Beijing’s mantra of “patriots administering Hong Kong” — posed for group pictures, celebrating a job well done after four years of opposition-free politics. However, despite their smiles, about one-third of the Legislative Council will not seek another term in next month’s election, with the self-described non-establishment figure Tik Chi-yuen (狄志遠) being among those bowing out. “It used to be that [the legislature] had the benefit of free expression... Now it is more uniform. There are multiple voices, but they are not diverse enough,” Tik said, comparing it