Sat, May 21, 2005 page5

• S Korea in face-to-face discussions with Pyongyang

  NO TALKS In what Seoul calls a modest victory, the South prepared to ship fertilizer to the North after a meeting, but the regime's weapons program was left off the table

  • AP
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  North Korea reached a modest deal with the South, but didn't ease its rhetoric yesterday against Seoul's allies.

  South Korea prepared to start shipping 200,000 tonnes of fertilizer across the border today as part of an agreement reached between the two rivals Thursday night after three days of hard bargaining in their first face-to-face meetings in 10 months.

  Seoul couldn't convince the North to return to six-nation negotiations on Pyongyang's worrisome nuclear weapons program -- or even mention the issue in a joint final statement -- but did obtain agreement on a followup meeting in Seoul in a month with Cabinet-level officials.

  South Korean officials also considered it a modest victory that the final statement committed both sides to "cooperate for peace on the Korean Peninsula."

  "The North Korean side listened with a very serious attitude, and what was delivered was a message that could affect the North's decision-making process," South Korea's Yonhap news agency quoted Unification Minister Chung Dong-young as saying.

  The North made no change in its anti-US and Japanese rhetoric.

  Its official Korean Central News Agency scoffed at Washington's recognition of the North's sovereignty as a "lie" and repeated claims that the Bush administration is plotting to overthrow Kim Jong Il.

  It targeted Japan with even harsher criticism for suggesting it would seek UN sanctions if the North were to hold a nuclear test.

  "Our republic has made it clear numerous times that we will consider any sanctions against our country tantamount to a declaration of war," KCNA quoted a commentary by the North's state-run Rodong Sinmun newspaper.

  Noting relations between Pyongyang and Tokyo have soured to "a dangerous stage on the verge of explosion," the commentary said: "Our republic will respond with strong retaliatory measures to Japan's move to impose economic sanctions."

  It was possible that Pyongyang was reacting to subtle pressure on a separate front.

  The North has been dependent on outside food aid since the 1990s, when more than 1 million people are estimated to have died from famine.

  The Wall Street Journal yesterday quoted officials at the US Agency for International Development as saying the Bush administration has halted all food-aid shipments to North Korea so far this year.

  US officials said there was no link to rising diplomatic tensions, attributing the curbs instead to an inability to monitor how the assistance is being used, as well as competing demands from famine-ravaged countries in Africa.

  Still, the mood was generally upbeat in Seoul. North Korea, which has shunned direct talks with the South on the nuclear issue, didn't walk out when South Korea repeatedly brought up the subject this week.

  "Not only did the North listen, but they have expressed understanding of our government's stance, and said that it will give the issue more study," said Rhee Bong-jo, the South's chief delegate. "Those five words, `peace on the Korean peninsula' succinctly reflect the southern government's will and the North's understanding of our stance."

  The North also is believed to be pondering an overture from Washington, which sent diplomats to a secret meeting last Friday at Pyongyang's UN office.

  The six-nation talks -- involving the two Koreas, the US, China, Japan and Russia -- are aimed at getting the North to abandon its nuclear arms program. Pyongyang said Feb. 10 that it has nuclear weapons and would stay away from the talks until Washington dropped its "hostile" policy.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    First person arrested as Danjiang Bridge opens

  • 2

    Police identify man who engaged in indecency at park

  • 3

    TSMC expects global chip revenue to hit US$1.5tn

  • 4

    Trump weighs Taiwan arms package

  • 5

    No surprises at Xi-Trump talks: MAC