Britain should oppose lifting an EU embargo on arms sales to China if it does not receive assurances the move will not lead to an increase in weapons sales or transfer of "sensitive technologies" to Beijing, a joint parliamentary committee report said yesterday.
Lawmakers cited the threat of US punitive measures, as well as China's aggressive posturing against Taiwan, as reasons to oppose a removal of the ban.
The EU's arms embargo was slapped on China after the 1989 massacre of pro-democracy students in Beijing's Tiananmen Square, but France has led a group of EU countries arguing that it is outdated and should be lifted.
The report, issued by a group of lawmakers drawn from four separate House of Commons committees on arms sales, warned of "major EU-US trade repercussions" in the event the ban is lifted -- a reference to Washington's threats to cut European companies out of defense contracts and deny them access to US technology.
The report also mentioned the risk that "EU member states [could] enhance China's military capacity in a worrying way," and that weapons exported from Europe could be used for internal repression.
It stressed that any end to the arms embargo should not lead to a qualitative or quantitative increase in arms sales, or the transfer of "sensitive technologies" to China.
"If such assurances cannot be obtained we recommend that the government opposes lifting the arms embargo and any other change of EU policy with regard to arms sales to China."
Committee chair Roger Berry said the "very real risks involved in the lifting of the EU arms embargo on China ... must be mitigated effectively."
Britain has backed a lifting of the ban, but officials have signaled it will seek to defer the decision until later in light of increasing pressure from the US, which claims it would upset the balance of power in the region and put Taiwan at risk.
Diplomatic sources quoted by media this week have said that London and some other EU states including Sweden, Belgium and Italy were leaning toward postponement of the decision on the arms ban.
The parliamentary report comes only hours after Deputy Prime Minister John Prescott backed lifting the ban -- although his comments were later watered down by Prime Minister Tony Blair's office.
Prescott, standing in for Blair, told parliament "I think the good sense in Europe will be that they will come to some agreement on this matter and lift that embargo."
Blair's spokesman said afterwards that the government supported EU plans to lift the embargo in principle but wanted first to create a strong code that would regulate sales to China.
FOX HUNT: To suppress dissent, Chinese living abroad that Xi Jinping sees as threats are told to either return to China or commit suicide, Christopher Wray said Chinese agents have been pursuing hundreds of Chinese nationals living in the US in an effort to force their return, as part of a global campaign against the country’s diaspora, known as Operation Fox Hunt, FBI Director Christopher Wray said on Tuesday. In a speech about the security threat posed by China, during which he said Beijing’s counterintelligence work was the “greatest long-term threat to our nation’s information and intellectual property, and to our economic vitality,” Wray gave the example of one Fox Hunt target who was given a choice of going back to China or killing themselves. Fox Hunt was launched
‘WOULD NOT COMPLY’: The company’s user data are kept in Singapore and it would not turn the data over to Beijing even if asked, TikTok chief executive Kevin Mayer said Social media app TikTok has distanced itself from Beijing after India banned 59 Chinese apps in the country, according to a correspondence seen by Reuters. In a letter to the Indian government dated on Sunday last week and seen by Reuters on Friday, TikTok chief executive Kevin Mayer said the Chinese government has never requested user data, nor would the company turn it over if asked. TikTok, which is not available in China, is owned by China’s ByteDance, but has sought to distance itself from its Chinese roots to appeal to a global audience. Along with 58 other Chinese apps, including Tencent
‘FIGHT FOR FREEDOM’: Hong Kongers will never bow to Beijing, the advocate said, while the US’ envoy to the territory called China’s new security law a ‘tragedy’ The world must stand in solidarity with Hong Kongers after Beijing imposed sweeping national security legislation on the semi-autonomous territory, advocate Joshua Wong (黃之鋒) said yesterday, vowing to continue campaigning for democracy. Wong, one of the territory’s most prominent young advocates and a figure loathed by Beijing, was speaking outside a court where he and fellow advocates are being prosecuted for involvement in last year’s pro-democracy protests. China last week enacted sweeping security legislation for the restless territory, banning acts of subversion, secession, terrorism and collusion with foreign forces. The legislation has sent a wave of fear through the territory, and criminalized dissenting
INTERNET CURBS: People are rushing to erase their digital footprints after police given powers over online activity, although it might take years for the full effect to be felt At midnight on Tuesday, the Great Firewall of China, the vast apparatus that limits the country’s Internet, appeared to descend on Hong Kong. Unveiling expanded police powers as part of contentious new national security legislation, the Hong Kong government enabled police to censor online speech, and force Internet service providers to hand over user information and shut down platforms. Many residents, already anxious since the legislation took effect last week, rushed to erase their digital footprint of any signs of dissent or support for the past year of protests. Hong Kong Legislator Charles Mok (莫乃光), a pro-democracy member of the Legislative