With polls forecasting defeat, a beleaguered Israeli Prime Minister Ariel Sharon warned party members that if they vote against his Gaza pullout plan, they may vote themselves out of power.
Sharon stopped short of saying he would resign if he lost, but said on Thursday he considered the referendum a personal vote of confidence. He portrayed his opponents in Likud as extremists who use "lies, obscene language and deceitful propaganda" in their campaign.
Sharon spoke after polls reflected a dramatic flip-flop among the 193,000 eligible Likud voters just three days before tomorrow's referendum. In recent weeks, supporters of the plan had maintained an edge of several percentage points, but three polls published on Thursday indicated a clear advantage for the opponents.
PHOTO: AP
The referendum marks the first time a vote is to be held in Israel on an issue that has divided the nation for decades: whether to give up land captured in the 1967 Middle East War. Under the plan, Sharon would withdraw troops and 7,500 settlers in the Gaza Strip and evacuate four small settlements in the West Bank.
Palestinians suspect Sharon is giving up Gaza to tighten his hold on much of the West Bank, and Sharon's critics in Israel believe he proposed the plan in part to deflect attention from two corruption probes against him.
Yet the withdrawal proposal also marks a drastic departure from Sharon's former views. For decades, as foremost champion of settlement expansion, he often placed new Israeli enclaves where they would most effectively break up contiguity of Palestinian areas.
In recent weeks, he has increasingly attacked his former core constituents. The settlers, he told the Maariv daily on Thursday, represent a minority in Israel and must not be allowed to impose their will on the country.
A no vote was a vote against the prime minister, he told Israel Radio. "You can't be for me, but be against my plan," he said, addressing Likud members. Painting a gloomy picture, he said a defeat of his plan would sour relations with the US and deal a serious blow to the Israeli economy.
Despite such warnings, polls published on Thursday indicated a sudden shift, with opponents taking the lead.
A poll published yesterday in the Yediot Ahronot daily said 47 percent of Likud members would vote against the plan, compared to 40.5 percent in favor. The survey showed a slight rise in support, from 39 percent a day earlier, but the level of opposition was unchanged. The poll said 12.5 percent of respondents were undecided.
Just two weeks ago, a similar poll by the same research company, Dahaf, found 54 percent in favor and 32 against. Yesterday's poll questioned 804 respondents.
It remains unclear whether Sharon will take the plan to his Cabinet and parliament for approval, even if he loses the referendum. He initially said he would be bound by the Likud vote, but has backtracked in recent days.
Sharon on Thursday raised the possibility of calling new elections if he loses. Another option is to reshuffle his Cabinet by bringing in the moderate Labor Party, a strong supporter of the plan.
Opponents have been running a tight campaign, with thousands of volunteers calling Likud members on the phone or visiting them at home. Their campaign has focused on the cost of uprooting people from homes and also accused Sharon of caving in to terrorism.
Eran Sternberg, a spokesman for the Gaza settlers, said activists had visited more than half the 193,000 Likud members and will continue such meetings until tomorrow.
"We have a very good feeling about the campaign," he said. "We think we're going to win."
Opponents received a boost on Thursday from 300 rabbis with ultranationalist views, who urged Likud members to vote against the plan. The rabbis said in a letter that a pullback violates religious precepts and endangers lives.
DOUBLE-MURDER CASE: The officer told the dispatcher he would check the locations of the callers, but instead headed to a pizzeria, remaining there for about an hour A New Jersey officer has been charged with misconduct after prosecutors said he did not quickly respond to and properly investigate reports of a shooting that turned out to be a double murder, instead allegedly stopping at an ATM and pizzeria. Franklin Township Police Sergeant Kevin Bollaro was the on-duty officer on the evening of Aug. 1, when police received 911 calls reporting gunshots and screaming in Pittstown, about 96km from Manhattan in central New Jersey, Hunterdon County Prosecutor Renee Robeson’s office said. However, rather than responding immediately, prosecutors said GPS data and surveillance video showed Bollaro drove about 3km
‘MOTHER’ OF THAILAND: In her glamorous heyday in the 1960s, former Thai queen Sirikit mingled with US presidents and superstars such as Elvis Presley The year-long funeral ceremony of former Thai queen Sirikit started yesterday, with grieving royalists set to salute the procession bringing her body to lie in state at Bangkok’s Grand Palace. Members of the royal family are venerated in Thailand, treated by many as semi-divine figures, and lavished with glowing media coverage and gold-adorned portraits hanging in public spaces and private homes nationwide. Sirikit, the mother of Thai King Vajiralongkorn and widow of the nation’s longest-reigning monarch, died late on Friday at the age of 93. Black-and-white tributes to the royal matriarch are being beamed onto towering digital advertizing billboards, on
Tens of thousands of people on Saturday took to the streets of Spain’s eastern city of Valencia to mark the first anniversary of floods that killed 229 people and to denounce the handling of the disaster. Demonstrators, many carrying photos of the victims, called on regional government head Carlos Mazon to resign over what they said was the slow response to one of Europe’s deadliest natural disasters in decades. “People are still really angry,” said Rosa Cerros, a 42-year-old government worker who took part with her husband and two young daughters. “Why weren’t people evacuated? Its incomprehensible,” she said. Mazon’s
POWER ABUSE WORRY: Some people warned that the broad language of the treaty could lead to overreach by authorities and enable the repression of government critics Countries signed their first UN treaty targeting cybercrime in Hanoi yesterday, despite opposition from an unlikely band of tech companies and rights groups warning of expanded state surveillance. The new global legal framework aims to bolster international cooperation to fight digital crimes, from child pornography to transnational cyberscams and money laundering. More than 60 countries signed the declaration, which means it would go into force once ratified by those states. UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres described the signing as an “important milestone,” and that it was “only the beginning.” “Every day, sophisticated scams destroy families, steal migrants and drain billions of dollars from our economy...