American scientists have developed a brain scan that they say can detect people harboring racial prejudice. In racially biased white people who were shown photographs of black faces, the researchers found surges of activity in a brain region known to control thoughts and behavior, which they say are due to suppressed prejudice.
The research has already provoked controversy, with some experts arguing the study's conclusions are misplaced. At its most far-reaching, the study raises the possibility that the minds of people, including police recruits, could be screened for racist attitudes.
The scientist who led the research admits she was stunned when she saw the results. "I was shocked. I couldn't believe we got this correspondence with the brain activity," said Jennifer Richeson, a neuroscientist at Dartmouth College in New Hampshire.
Richeson said the brain activity arises because the volunteers are concentrating on not doing or saying anything offensive. This inner struggle tires the brain so much, she said, that prejudiced white people who interacted with black people would find it difficult to concentrate afterward.
"If they had an interaction that was hard to negotiate and then went back to work, they might not be able to focus on the task they're doing because they're exhausted," Richeson said.
To conduct the research, her team first asked 30 white students to take an implicit association test (IAT), in which they associated white or black names with positive or negative words. The test is contentious, but it is widely used as a convenient measure of unconscious or automatic racial bias. The students were not told what the test was about. They then briefly met a black or white person before being asked to complete a difficult mental task. Two weeks later the same students were asked to help in an unrelated experiment, in which they were handed pictures of the faces of black or white people while having their brains scanned with functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) equipment.
The scientists found a strong link between a volunteer's IAT score and activity in a region of their brain called the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex. Those with the highest levels of brain activity also performed the worst in the difficult mental task.
"The people are working hard to negotiate the interaction and then they're spent. It's almost like depleting a muscle: if you work it out too much then you can't lift any more weight," Richeson said.
Others say it is dangerous to interpret the results that way.
"That's exactly the kind of inference we're arguing it would be unfortunate to draw at this point," said Bill Gehring, a psychologist at the University of Michigan. "There just isn't enough known about what this task is actually showing."
The controversial study is published today in the journal Nature Neuroscience, which also discusses it in an editorial as well as publishing an accompanying article trying to explain the context.
"This study is likely to be widely discussed, so it is important to emphasize that it is not about biological determinants of racial prejudice," the editorial says. "Although it describes neural correlates of implicit bias, it says nothing about the source of this bias; even more importantly it says nothing about the relationship between implicit bias and actual behavior toward people of other races."
Trevor Phillips, chairman of the Commission for Racial Equality, welcomed the research, but said using brain scans as a test for racism would not be useful.
"We spend far too much time worried about trying to detect racism in people rather than circumscribing the behavior which leads to bias," he said. "There are people who have racist attitudes who are perfectly fair and even-handed in the ways they treat people, and there are people who would think of themselves as committed anti-racists who consistently show bias in the way they behave."
Gehring, who helped to write the journal's accompanying article, disputes some of the study's conclusions: "These are very important empirical findings concerning the mental processes that go on when people interact with someone of a different race, but what these findings mean is not clarified yet. You have to be very careful about how you interpret them."
He said IAT scores are not necessarily an accurate measure of an individual's racial bias, and it is inevitable that the study volunteers would have realized what the researchers were looking for.
"Clearly at some point everyone realizes it must be about their racial bias and they feel they're being assessed. That is an additional factor that must be taken into account."
Others say brain activity like that seen in the study could indicate more than just racial prejudice.
"The effect the authors describe is really a subset of a much more general phenomenon, that of social distraction," says Professor Bob Turner, of University College London. "Consider the difficulty of remaining focused on a serious topic of discussion when one's interlocutor is a young, curvaceous blonde with a very low-cut dress." He said that comparison studies are needed with less politically loaded social distractions.
DEADLOCK: Putin has vowed to continue fighting unless Ukraine cedes more land, while talks have been paused with no immediate results expected, the Kremlin said Russia on Friday said that peace talks with Kyiv were on “pause” as Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskiy warned that Russian President Vladimir Putin still wanted to capture the whole of Ukraine. Meanwhile, US President Donald Trump said that he was running out of patience with Putin, and the NATO alliance said it would bolster its eastern front after Russian drones were shot down in Polish airspace this week. The latest blow to faltering diplomacy came as Russia’s army staged major military drills with its key ally Belarus. Despite Trump forcing the warring sides to hold direct talks and hosting Putin in Alaska, there
North Korea has executed people for watching or distributing foreign television shows, including popular South Korean dramas, as part of an intensifying crackdown on personal freedoms, a UN human rights report said on Friday. Surveillance has grown more pervasive since 2014 with the help of new technologies, while punishments have become harsher — including the introduction of the death penalty for offences such as sharing foreign TV dramas, the report said. The curbs make North Korea the most restrictive country in the world, said the 14-page UN report, which was based on interviews with more than 300 witnesses and victims who had
COMFORT WOMEN CLASH: Japan has strongly rejected South Korean court rulings ordering the government to provide reparations to Korean victims of sexual slavery The Japanese government yesterday defended its stance on wartime sexual slavery and described South Korean court rulings ordering Japanese compensation as violations of international law, after UN investigators criticized Tokyo for failing to ensure truth-finding and reparations for the victims. In its own response to UN human rights rapporteurs, South Korea called on Japan to “squarely face up to our painful history” and cited how Tokyo’s refusal to comply with court orders have denied the victims payment. The statements underscored how the two Asian US allies still hold key differences on the issue, even as they pause their on-and-off disputes over historical
Decked out with fake crystal chandeliers and velvet sofas, cosmetic surgery clinics in Afghanistan’s capital are a world away from the austerity of Taliban rule, where Botox, lip filler and hair transplants reign. Despite the Taliban authorities’ strict theocratic rule, and prevailing conservatism and poverty in Afghanistan, the 20 or so clinics in Kabul have flourished since the end of decades of war in the country. Foreign doctors, especially from Turkey, travel to Kabul to train Afghans, who equally undertake internships in Istanbul, while equipment is imported from Asia or Europe. In the waiting rooms, the clientele is often well-off and includes men
RSS