Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) yesterday unveiled an ambitious national policy for Taiwan’s national defense industry, which the party said would help decrease Taiwan’s reliance on foreign arms exports and generate NT$400 billion (US$12.17 billion) in direct and secondary benefits.
The party said that its policies would also help generate 8,000 job opportunities, realize the goal of manufacturing submarines domestically and establish an information technology corps in the military.
The establishment of a “fourth branch” (cyberarmy) was mentioned in a Tsai blue paper in May. Its authority would be on par with the command headquarters of the other branches of the armed forces and headed by a general or the equivalent, with the hopes of being fully staffed and functional by 2024.
Photo: George Tsorng, Taipei Times
Under the DPP’s policies, the defense industry would generate NT$250 billion in net profit, DPP defense policy convener Chen Wen-cheng (陳文政) said.
The figure, based on future national defense budgets minus foreign purchases, maintenance fees and human resource expenditures, is still in flux due to possible adjustments according to economic growth, Chen said.
Taiwan Institute of Economic Research deputy director Kung Ming-hsin (龔明鑫) said the estimated net profit was the minimum and total profits should exceed NT$400 billion.
Kung said the inter-linking of industries could bring in 1.7 times the original estimate, adding that with calculations based on figures from 2011 — a year of many foreign arms purchases — total profits for the industry could be even higher.
Once the policy is implemented and more military equipment is made in Taiwan, it will have ripple effects, Kung said.
Chen said the figure of 8,000 jobs being created was estimated based on in-depth knowledge of how a number of defense industry factories fared, Chen said, adding that the numbers were not “made in a cloistered study room.”
Chen said that inaction by President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) administration was to blame for problems facing the domestic production of submarines.
Taiwan lacks key technology to manufacture submarines domestically, technology only accessible through international cooperation, but the Ma administration has done nothing to obtain it during his terms in office, Chen said.
Taiwan must demonstrate sincerity, such as allocating funds, before foreign nations would be willing to start talks on cooperation, Chen said.
Chen said that unlike Ma, the DPP is determined to see the project through, adding that 40 people from 19 companies had attended the US-Taiwan Defense Industry Conference held in Williamsburg, Virginia, from Oct. 4 to Oct. 6, clearly demonstrating to the US the DPP’s resolve.
Chen said the party was not surprised by escalating tensions in the South China Sea and the recent report by the Ministry of National Defense that China’s People’s Liberation Army will soon be capable of launching a full-blown assault on Taiwan.
The disparity in cross-strait military forces is one that cannot be ignored and is the main reason the DPP is stressing the development of the defense industry, DPP Secretary-General Joseph Wu (吳釗燮) said.
The party’s stance on the South China Sea is that it opposes any action that escalates tensions in the area, Wu said, adding that any claims of sovereignty in the South China Sea must be based on international law and most importantly, must be in compliance with both the letter and spirit of the UN’s Convention on the Law of the Sea.
Tsai said that while some of the DPP’s policies may seem similar to the current administration, the capability and methods with which the DPP would implement the ideas greatly differs from Ma’s administration.
Compared with Ma’s lack of an overarching strategy to ensure an obstacle-free environment and comprehensive planning, the DPP will be a cohesive administration with a unified view that is led by a leader with a strong vision of where defense policy is going, Tsai said.
OVERHAUL NEEDED: The government should improve its agricultural processing capabilities and expand to new markets to limit its reliance on China, an expert said China’s ban on Taiwanese pineapples was “unsurprising,” and Taiwan should have years ago altered its produce export strategies and target customers, experts said. China on Friday abruptly suspended imports of pineapples from Taiwan, saying that it had on multiple occasions discovered “harmful biological entities” on the fruit. Calling it an “unfriendly” move, the Council of Agriculture (COA) said that 99.79 percent of the pineapples sent to China since last year have met China’s import standards. Chiao Chun (焦鈞), the author of Fruits and Politics — A Recollection of Cross-strait Agricultural Interaction Over the Past Decade (水果政治學：兩岸農業交流十年回顧與展望), said that China’s announcement is clearly targeting
The Council of Agriculture yesterday signed a Taiwan-Australia Agricultural Cooperation Implementation clause to open a new export market for the nation’s pineapple crop. The clause is an addition to existing cooperation measures, it said. China on Friday last week abruptly announced that it would suspend pineapple imports from Taiwan starting on Monday, on grounds that it had on multiple occasions discovered “harmful organisms” in shipments of the fruit. The public and private sectors have since joined hands to purchase the local fruit to help the nation’s pineapple farmers. Canberra has requested that all pineapples for export to Australia have their crown buds removed,
DECADES OF INFLUENCE: Over the past 20 years, China has made inroads with Aborigines, funding political campaigns and trips, a legislator said Lawmakers have called on the National Security Bureau to investigate claims of pervasive Chinese influence among Aboriginal communities. Legislators pointed to a surge in communist propaganda and Chinese-funded projects over the past few years, which they say are aimed at infiltrating and buying political influence among Aboriginal communities. “China has for decades carried out wide-ranging ‘united front’ tactics and propaganda campaigns targeting Aborigines,” said Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Chen Ying (陳瑩), a member of the Puyuma community in Taitung County. “Now, they are influencing elections for local councilors and village chiefs, offering money for candidates to mount their campaigns, and to
DISSATISFACTION? If the referendums collect more than 700,000 signatures each, they would have gotten the most signatures in the shortest time, the party said The Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) two referendum petitions — one on banning the importation of pork with traces of ractopamine and the other on holding referendums on the same day as national elections — had as of Thursday gathered 691,398 and 674,497 signatures respectively, the party said yesterday. If the petitions collect more than 700,000 signatures apiece, they would have garnered the most signatures in the shortest time since the Referendum Act (公民投票法) was amended in 2017, party officials said. The KMT proposed the “anti-ractopamine pork” or “food safety” referendum just days after President Tsai Ing-wen’s (蔡英文) announcement on Aug. 28 last