Several academics in the legal field yesterday said that President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Premier Jiang Yi-huah (江宜樺) are obscuring the facts and misleading the public by asserting that it would be against the Constitution to stop construction of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant in New Taipei City’s (新北市) Gongliao District (貢寮).
Two civic groups urged the Cabinet and the ruling party not to use supposed violations of the Constitution as an excuse for holding a referendum on the matter, because a referendum should be held based on the principle of responsible politics.
Hsu Wei-chun (徐偉群), an associate professor at Chung Yuan Christian University’s Law School and director of Taiwan Democracy Watch, said Ma claimed that, based on the Council of Grand Justices’ Interpretation No. 520, the Cabinet would violate the Constitution if it directly announced a halt to the plant’s construction.
However, the interpretation also states that if the Cabinet wants to halt an important policy, it can do so by reporting to the legislature and gaining approval from a majority of legislators, so the Cabinet is misleading the public into thinking that the project can only be stopped through a referendum, Hsu added.
Moreover, Ma claimed that based on the frozen second paragraph of Article 57 of the Constitution, it would be against the Constitution if the legislature decided to stop the construction, Hsu said.
He added that the paragraph was actually only frozen on the efficacy of overthrowing the Cabinet, and does not mean that the legislature is forbidden to make decisions that contrast with Cabinet policy.
Academia Sinica Institutum Iurisprudentiae associate research professor Chiou Wen-tsong (邱文聰) said the high threshold of 50 percent of eligible voters in the nation having to vote in a referendum for it to be valid is unreasonable, and the government should not deliberately use it to manipulate a referendum’s result.
In addition, Kao Yung-cheng (高涌誠), an attorney and longtime human rights advocate, said that even if the referendum becomes invalid because the number of voters did not reach the high threshold, it does not mean that the people support the construction of the nuclear power plant, but only that the public have not yet decided on the issue.
Hsu said the Cabinet was irresponsible for making voters decide the fate of the plant through a referendum and they urged that the Referendum Act (公民投票法) be amended.
The Green Citizen Action Alliance said that many civic groups will encircle the Legislative Yuan in protest tomorrow morning, when the legislature is scheduled to deliberate and vote on Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers’ proposal to hold a national referendum to decide the fate of the plant.
The German city of Hamburg on Oct. 14 named a bridge “Kaohsiung-Brucke” after the Taiwanese city of Kaohsiung. The footbridge, formerly known as F566, is to the east of the Speicherstadt, the world’s largest warehouse district, and connects the Dar-es-Salaam-Platz to the Brooktorpromenade near the Port of Hamburg on the Elbe River. Timo Fischer, a Free Democratic Party member of the Hamburg-Mitte District Assembly, in May last year proposed the name change with support from members of the Social Democratic Party and the Christian Democratic Union. Kaohsiung and Hamburg in 1999 inked a sister city agreement, but despite more than a quarter-century of
Taiwanese officials are courting podcasters and influencers aligned with US President Donald Trump as they grow more worried the US leader could undermine Taiwanese interests in talks with China, people familiar with the matter said. Trump has said Taiwan would likely be on the agenda when he is expected to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) next week in a bid to resolve persistent trade tensions. China has asked the White House to officially declare it “opposes” Taiwanese independence, Bloomberg reported last month, a concession that would mark a major diplomatic win for Beijing. President William Lai (賴清德) and his top officials
The Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) yesterday expressed “grave concerns” after Singaporean Prime Minister Lawrence Wong (黃循財) reiterated the city-state’s opposition to “Taiwanese independence” during a meeting with Chinese Premier Li Qiang (李強). In Singapore on Saturday, Wong and Li discussed cross-strait developments, the Singaporean Ministry of Foreign Affairs said in a statement. “Prime Minister Wong reiterated that Singapore has a clear and consistent ‘one China’ policy and is opposed to Taiwan independence,” it said. MOFA responded that it is an objective fact and a common understanding shared by many that the Republic of China (ROC) is an independent, sovereign nation, with world-leading
‘ONE CHINA’: A statement that Berlin decides its own China policy did not seem to sit well with Beijing, which offered only one meeting with the German official German Minister for Foreign Affairs Johann Wadephul’s trip to China has been canceled, a spokesperson for his ministry said yesterday, amid rising tensions between the two nations, including over Taiwan. Wadephul had planned to address Chinese curbs on rare earths during his visit, but his comments about Berlin deciding on the “design” of its “one China” policy ahead of the trip appear to have rankled China. Asked about Wadephul’s comments, Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Guo Jiakun (郭嘉昆) said the “one China principle” has “no room for any self-definition.” In the interview published on Thursday, Wadephul said he would urge China to
RSS