The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) yesterday said it was determined to engage the government head-on in a “referendum war” over the referendum proposal on the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant in Gongliao (貢寮), New Taipei City (新北市).
“The Executive Yuan did not submit the proposal to resolve the controversy, but to cover up the construction of the plant with unreasonable legislation,” DPP Chairman Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) told a press conference, titled “No nuke, no fear,” held at the party’s headquarters yesterday.
The DPP’s Central Standing Committee (CSC) passed a resolution yesterday to engage the government, which had presented “a politically calculated and dishonest referendum question,” on two fronts — in the legislature and through civic movements, Su said.
The DPP, which argues that the current Referendum Act is a “birdcage” piece of legislation because of its unusually high threshold, will try to amend the bill by lowering the current threshold, whereby a referendum is only valid if more than half of the electorate vote and half of those voters support it.
The proposed referendum is an obvious political maneuver and an abuse of administrative power, former premier Yu Shyi-kun said.
He said the DPP had decided to “go to war with reckless abandon” because an anti-nuclear stance had always been one of the party’s core values and the battle would give the DPP an opportunity to highlight its beliefs.
As the referendum question has become the focal point of the dispute and a crucial factor in the battle, Yu said the DPP should work with civic groups on submitting a separate referendum to rival the government initiative.
Given the high threshold, almost all supporters of the anti-nuclear movement say that if a referendum is to be held, the question should be: “Do you support the construction of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant?” rather than “Do you support suspending construction of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant?”
A DPP CSC resolution supports the proposition, but it was decided that the party should only play a supporting role if civic groups decided to launch a petition for a rival referendum, DPP spokesperson Lin Chun-hsien (林俊憲) said.
However, the DPP was ready to work on the immediate establishment of four task forces — advocacy, communication, organization and social movement — to work with civic groups for better integration of the anti-nuclear movement and to win the referendum, Lin added.
The DPP legislative caucus echoed the same position at a press conference yesterday morning, saying that the referendum question should be framed as: “Do you support the construction of the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant?”
The caucus would focus on four issues in negotiations in the Legislative Yuan next week, DPP Legislator Pan Men-an (潘孟安) said.
Those issues would be the threshold and the framing of the referendum question; whether it would be a national referendum or a local referendum; and whether there would be two simultaneous referendums, he said.
DPP Legislator Cheng Li-chiun (鄭麗君) said that Taiwan Power Co should disclose all available information on electricity production and reserve capacity in Taiwan, so that the referendum would be fair.
FAST TRACK? Chinese spouses must renounce their Chinese citizenship and pledge allegiance to Taiwan to gain citizenship, some demonstrators said Opponents and supporters of a bill that would allow Chinese spouses to obtain Taiwanese citizenship in four years instead of six staged protests near the Legislative Yuan in Taipei yesterday morning. Those who oppose the bill proposed by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) demanded that Chinese spouses be granted citizenship only after renouncing their Chinese citizenship, passing a citizenship test and pledging allegiance to Taiwan. The demonstrators, who were protesting at a side entrance to the Legislative Yuan on Jinan Road, were mostly members of the Taiwan Association of University Professors and other organizations advocating Taiwanese independence. Supporters of the bill, led
SILENT MAJORITY: Only 1 percent of Chinese rejected all options but war to annex Taiwan, while one-third viewed war as unacceptable, a university study showed Many Chinese are more concerned with developments inside their country than with seeking unification with Taiwan, al-Jazeera reported on Friday. Although China claims Taiwan as its own territory and has vowed to annex it, by force if necessary, 23-year-old Chinese Shao Hongtian was quoted by al-Jazeera as saying that “hostilities are not the way to bring China and Taiwan together.” “I want unification to happen peacefully,” Shao said. Al-Jazeera said it changed Shao’s name to respect his wish for anonymity. If peaceful unification is not possible, Shao said he would prefer “things to remain as they are,” adding that many of his friends feel
Taiwan has “absolute air superiority” over China in its own airspace, Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) told a meeting of the legislature’s Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee on Monday, amid concern over whether Taipei could defend itself against a military incursion by Beijing. Po made the remarks in response to a question from Democratic Progressive Party Legislator Chiu Chih-wei (邱志偉) on whether Taiwan would have partial or complete air superiority if Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) warplanes were to enter Taiwan’s airspace. Po, a retired pilot, said that the Taiwanese military has “absolute air superiority” over PLA
A shipment of basil pesto imported by Costco Wholesale Taiwan from the US in the middle of last month was intercepted at the border after testing positive for excessive pesticide residue, the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) said yesterday. Samples taken from a shipment of the Kirkland Signature brand of basil pesto imported by Costco contained 0.1 milligrams per kilogram of ethylene oxide, exceeding the non-detectable limit. Ethylene oxide is a carcinogenic substance that can be used as a pesticide. The 674kg shipment of basil pesto would either be destroyed or returned to its country of origin, as is the procedure for all