With the assistance of lawyers and civic groups, several residents from New Taipei City’s (新北市) Jinshan (金山) and Wanli (萬里) districts on Friday filed an administrative appeal with the Executive Yuan, asking it to rescind the Atomic Energy Council’s (AEC) authorization last month to reactivate the Guosheng Nuclear Power Plant’s No. 1 reactor.
Environmental Jurists Association secretary-general Echo Lin (林仁惠) said 25 people, including local residents and representatives of civic groups, who all live within 30km to 40km of the nuclear plant, collectively filed the administrative appeal asking the operation at the plant to be halted.
Tsai Ya-ying (蔡雅瀅), an attorney affiliated with Wild at Heart, said the first reactor at the plant in Wanli, New Taipei City, which was built in 1973 and began operating in 1981, has been running for more than thirty years, so it is not only very old, but there have been several incidents that raised safety concerns.
Photo: Tseng Hung-ju, Taipei Times
According to a report by the AEC in June last year, the emergency circulating cooling water system is located in the basement of the plant, below the possible maximum altitude of a tsunami, Tsai said, adding that cracks were found in anchor bolts and the core shroud during a routine maintenance check in March this year.
Tsai said there are procedural defects in the AEC’s decision to allow the reactor to restart, including not holding a public hearing on the issue as stipulated in the Administrative Procedure Act (行政程序法).
It also violated conflict of interest rules by having two members of the Institute of Nuclear Energy Research, which has contracts with Taiwan Power Co, on the committee in charge of evaluating the restart, she added.
“Japan’s Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear crisis was later found to be a preventable disaster with several crucial defects that already existed [before it was hit by a tsunami],” said Wu Huang-ching (吳磺慶), one of the volunteer lawyers. “If the Fukushima Dai-ichi nuclear plant had been stopped by legal procedure, maybe it wouldn’t have caused such a widespread disaster, so the administrative appeal is to prevent possible future disasters.”
The group expressed hope that the Executive Yuan would re-evaluate whether the plant should continue operating and whether there are defects that need to be fixed or that require it to be shut down.
“This issue is not just about us, it’s a matter that involves everyone in Taiwan,” Jinshan Anti-Nuclear Self-Help Association chairperson Hsu Fu-hsiung (許富雄) said.
Hsu added that the AEC has failed to fulfill its duty of monitoring nuclear safety and that a nuclear disaster could destroy the whole nation, so it is an unacceptable risk.
The Coast Guard Administration (CGA) yesterday said it had deployed patrol vessels to expel a China Coast Guard ship and a Chinese fishing boat near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙群島) in the South China Sea. The China Coast Guard vessel was 28 nautical miles (52km) northeast of Pratas at 6:15am on Thursday, approaching the island’s restricted waters, which extend 24 nautical miles from its shoreline, the CGA’s Dongsha-Nansha Branch said in a statement. The Tainan, a 2,000-tonne cutter, was deployed by the CGA to shadow the Chinese ship, which left the area at 2:39pm on Friday, the statement said. At 6:31pm on Friday,
The Chinese People’s Liberation Army Navy’s (PLAN) third aircraft carrier, the Fujian, would pose a steep challenge to Taiwan’s ability to defend itself against a full-scale invasion, a defense expert said yesterday. Institute of National Defense and Security Research analyst Chieh Chung (揭仲) made the comment hours after the PLAN confirmed the carrier recently passed through the Taiwan Strait to conduct “scientific research tests and training missions” in the South China Sea. China has two carriers in operation — the Liaoning and the Shandong — with the Fujian undergoing sea trials. Although the PLAN needs time to train the Fujian’s air wing and
The American Institute in Taiwan (AIT) put Taiwan in danger, Ma Ying-jeou Foundation director Hsiao Hsu-tsen (蕭旭岑) said yesterday, hours after the de facto US embassy said that Beijing had misinterpreted World War II-era documents to isolate Taiwan. The AIT’s comments harmed the Republic of China’s (ROC) national interests and contradicted a part of the “six assurances” stipulating that the US would not change its official position on Taiwan’s sovereignty, Hsiao said. The “six assurances,” which were given by then-US president Ronald Reagan to Taiwan in 1982, say that Washington would not set a date for ending arm sales to Taiwan, consult
A Taiwanese academic yesterday said that Chinese Ambassador to Denmark Wang Xuefeng (王雪峰) disrespected Denmark and Japan when he earlier this year allegedly asked Japan’s embassy to make Taiwan’s representatives leave an event in Copenhagen. The Danish-language Berlingske on Sunday reported the incident in an article with the headline “The emperor’s birthday ended in drama in Copenhagen: More conflict may be on the way between Denmark and China.” It said that on Feb. 26, the Japanese embassy in Denmark held an event for Japanese Emperor Naruhito’s birthday, with about 200 guests in attendance, including representatives from Taiwan. After addressing the Japanese hosts, Wang
RSS