A National Human Rights preliminary report scheduled to be released by the Presidential Office later this month should include a review of the Referendum Act (公民投票法), which deprives people of their rights, a number of academics said yesterday.
The act, enacted in 2003, has been dubbed “birdcage” legislation because of the unreasonably high threshold needed to launch a referendum drive.
The act stipulates that a referendum proposal, after completing a first stage whereby signatures from 0.5 percent of the number of eligible voters in the previous presidential election have been collected, must obtain approval from the Referendum Review Committee before it can proceed to the next stage, which involves collecting signatures from 5 percent of voters.
Photo: Liao Chen-huei, Taipei Times
It must then pass a second review before making it to polling stations.
Academia Sinica deputy researcher Liao Fu-te (廖福特) told a press conference that the act failed to deliver on its purpose, handing power to the people, and it did not meet the standards defined in the UN’s International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights and the International Covenant on Economic Social and Cultural Rights.
The first article of both of the UN covenants details the right of self-determination and “by virtue of that right, the people freely determine their political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural development.” Liao said.
He said since the implementation of the act, not one referendum has been held because of the high threshold it stipulates.
It is the equivalent of not having the right of referendum, and the Presidential Office’s planned National Human Rights report should address this issue, Liao said.
Liao said the Council of the Europe’s Code of Good Practice on Referendums states plainly that “based on its experience in the area of referendums, the Venice Commission has decided to recommend that no provision be made for rules on quorums, [including] ... turn-out quorums (minimum percentages) mean that it is in the interests of a proposal’s opponents to abstain rather than to vote against, [or] approval quorums (acceptance by a minimum percentage of registered voters) as it may also be inconclusive.”
The threshold regulation of Taiwan’s act is in direct violation of its purpose — trying to encourage citizens to participate in referendums, Liao said.
Another Academia Sinica deputy researcher, Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌), said that although the administration of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) signed both the UN covenants into law and passed legislation in accordance with them, limitations in the act are hurting efforts to hold referendums in Taiwan.
Translated by Jake Chung, staff writer
TRAFFIC SAFETY RULES: A positive result in a drug test would result in a two-year license suspension for the driver and vehicle, and a fine of up to NT$180,000 The Ministry of Transportation and Communications is to authorize police to conduct roadside saliva tests by the end of the year to deter people from driving while under the influence of narcotics, it said yesterday. The ministry last month unveiled a draft of amended regulations governing traffic safety rules and penalties, which included provisions empowering police to conduct mandatory saliva tests on drivers. While currently rules authorize police to use oral fluid testing kits for signs of drug use, they do not establish penalties for noncompliance or operating procedures for officers to follow, the ministry said. The proposed changes to the regulations require
The Executive Yuan yesterday announced that registration for a one-time universal NT$10,000 cash handout to help people in Taiwan survive US tariffs and inflation would start on Nov. 5, with payouts available as early as Nov. 12. Who is eligible for the handout? Registered Taiwanese nationals are eligible, including those born in Taiwan before April 30 next year with a birth certificate. Non-registered nationals with residence permits, foreign permanent residents and foreign spouses of Taiwanese citizens with residence permits also qualify for the handouts. For people who meet the eligibility requirements, but passed away between yesterday and April 30 next year, surviving family members
China Airlines Ltd (CAL) yesterday morning joined SkyTeam’s Aviation Challenge for the fourth time, operating a demonstration flight for “net zero carbon emissions” from Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport to Bangkok. The flight used sustainable aviation fuel (SAF) at a ratio of up to 40 percent, the highest proportion CAL has achieved to date, the nation’s largest carrier said. Since April, SAF has become available to Taiwanese international carriers at Taipei International Airport (Songshan airport), Kaohsiung International Airport and Taoyuan airport. In previous challenges, CAL operated “net zero carbon emission flights” to Singapore and Japan. At a ceremony at Taoyuan airport, China Airlines chief sustainability
‘ONE CHINA’: A statement that Berlin decides its own China policy did not seem to sit well with Beijing, which offered only one meeting with the German official German Minister for Foreign Affairs Johann Wadephul’s trip to China has been canceled, a spokesperson for his ministry said yesterday, amid rising tensions between the two nations, including over Taiwan. Wadephul had planned to address Chinese curbs on rare earths during his visit, but his comments about Berlin deciding on the “design” of its “one China” policy ahead of the trip appear to have rankled China. Asked about Wadephul’s comments, Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Guo Jiakun (郭嘉昆) said the “one China principle” has “no room for any self-definition.” In the interview published on Thursday, Wadephul said he would urge China to
RSS