Many of the 34 academics who signed an open letter to President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) questioning his administration’s decision to investigate former senior Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) officials over 36,000 supposedly missing government documents are far from satisfied or reassured by the government’s response.
Presidential Office spokesman Lo Chih-chiang (羅智強) denied in a letter received by the academics this week that the investigation was politically motivated, even though it was announced on the eve of former premier Su Tseng-chang’s (蘇貞昌) registration for the DPP’s primaries for next year’s presidential election.
Su is one of the 17 people being investigated.
“I am surprised at the sharp response of the Ma administration, which seems disproportionate to the letter itself,” June Teufel Dreyer of the University of Miami said. “I daresay that few of the signers find spokesperson Lo’s explanation convincing.”
Dreyer said the signatories had also heard “disquieting comments” from Lo and others alleging that the letter was originally written in Chinese (“it was originally written in English”) and that the signatories were ignorant of Taiwan.
“Really, some of us have lived there for decades; others visit regularly, read Taiwan newspapers and watch Taiwan television. Some were born in Taiwan; one carries a Taiwan/ROC passport. How then can we be considered ignorant? One must wonder how many documents were lost in the 2000 presidential transition,” she said.
Author Gordon Chang (章家敦), another of those who signed the open letter, said: “The case of the 36,000 missing documents is a whodunit without a crime, at least no crime involving the documents in question. But of course there is one crime in this drama. And what is that? That is the willingness of President Ma’s administration to use its investigatory powers to influence the upcoming elections. That crime is real, shameful and corrosive of democracy.”
“We sent the letter because someone had to speak out. The assertion that we are ‘foreigners’ who should mind our own business is regrettably the same one Beijing makes whenever someone points out the obvious about human rights in China. This is a perfect time to call a ‘time out’ on Ma’s march back to authoritarianism,” he said.
And Stephen Yates, former deputy assistant for national security affairs to former US vice president Dick Cheney, said: “News of the recent government action against several of the most senior officials in the previous administration struck many of us as unusual and questionable. It appeared to be part of a troubling pattern of expansive, lengthy and repeated investigations, indictments and trials of former administration officials. Much of which amounts to a criminalization of politics and an erosion of justice.”
“Senior elected and appointed officials in any government are not responsible for document management. And the fact that two-and-a-half years passed before this issue was referred to the Control Yuan for investigation also is inconsistent with any notion of real national security or law enforcement concern,” Yates said.
John Tkacik, a former senior research fellow with the Heritage Foundation, said: “Supposedly these documents are circulating outside the Presidential Office. Why weren’t there any examples given? Surely, the Presidential Office could have pointed to some of the unclassified documents that are missing and demonstrate how their circulation is injuring the public interest. That in itself is enough to make anyone suspect that the accusations are politically motivated. At this point, the 36,000 documents affair looks like deminimis non curat lex — trifles not to be handled under the law.”
The Executive Yuan yesterday announced that registration for a one-time universal NT$10,000 cash handout to help people in Taiwan survive US tariffs and inflation would start on Nov. 5, with payouts available as early as Nov. 12. Who is eligible for the handout? Registered Taiwanese nationals are eligible, including those born in Taiwan before April 30 next year with a birth certificate. Non-registered nationals with residence permits, foreign permanent residents and foreign spouses of Taiwanese citizens with residence permits also qualify for the handouts. For people who meet the eligibility requirements, but passed away between yesterday and April 30 next year, surviving family members
The German city of Hamburg on Oct. 14 named a bridge “Kaohsiung-Brucke” after the Taiwanese city of Kaohsiung. The footbridge, formerly known as F566, is to the east of the Speicherstadt, the world’s largest warehouse district, and connects the Dar-es-Salaam-Platz to the Brooktorpromenade near the Port of Hamburg on the Elbe River. Timo Fischer, a Free Democratic Party member of the Hamburg-Mitte District Assembly, in May last year proposed the name change with support from members of the Social Democratic Party and the Christian Democratic Union. Kaohsiung and Hamburg in 1999 inked a sister city agreement, but despite more than a quarter-century of
Taiwanese officials are courting podcasters and influencers aligned with US President Donald Trump as they grow more worried the US leader could undermine Taiwanese interests in talks with China, people familiar with the matter said. Trump has said Taiwan would likely be on the agenda when he is expected to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) next week in a bid to resolve persistent trade tensions. China has asked the White House to officially declare it “opposes” Taiwanese independence, Bloomberg reported last month, a concession that would mark a major diplomatic win for Beijing. President William Lai (賴清德) and his top officials
‘ONE CHINA’: A statement that Berlin decides its own China policy did not seem to sit well with Beijing, which offered only one meeting with the German official German Minister for Foreign Affairs Johann Wadephul’s trip to China has been canceled, a spokesperson for his ministry said yesterday, amid rising tensions between the two nations, including over Taiwan. Wadephul had planned to address Chinese curbs on rare earths during his visit, but his comments about Berlin deciding on the “design” of its “one China” policy ahead of the trip appear to have rankled China. Asked about Wadephul’s comments, Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Guo Jiakun (郭嘉昆) said the “one China principle” has “no room for any self-definition.” In the interview published on Thursday, Wadephul said he would urge China to
RSS