A political strongman in the mold of former Cuban president Fidel Castro is likely to emerge in Taiwan to resist China’s economic interference should the proposed economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA) with Beijing ravage the middle-classes and benefit only large corporations, an expert attending a forum on the ECFA said yesterday.
Hsu Chung-hsin (?H), a law professor at National Cheng Kung University, said once China took over Taiwan’s economy, even if Taiwan was still politically independent, a candidate with a radical platform was likely to be elected because the public would likely no longer be able to stand the yawning chasm between rich and poor and the stagnation of salaries.
“Cuba is living proof,” he said. “If Taiwan and China become a free-trade area, Taiwan’s economy will be controlled by China. It is not a good idea to have free-trade with a country that harbors political and military ambitions against us.”
Hsu made the remarks during a forum in Taipei yesterday morning. The event, entitled “ECFA: Eventual Colonization Framework Arrangement,” was organized by Taiwan Advocates, a group founded by former president Lee Teng-hui (李登輝).
Hsu said since the trade pact would cover service industries, such as banking, it would only serve the best interest of the country if the administration amends the Banking Act (銀行法) to ensure head offices in Taiwan do not have to take responsibility should the capital of branches in China be frozen or nationalized for political reasons.
“I’m not against doing business with China, but a responsible government must have a well-thought-out plan to minimize the risks,” he said. “I’m all for investing in China if the interests of Taiwanese businesspeople are well protected and that is the responsibility of the government.”
Max Huang (黃國昌), an assistant research fellow of law at Academia Sinica, criticized the Referendum Review Committee for its decision to block a Taiwan Solidarity Union proposal to hold a referendum on whether the government should sign an ECFA with China.
Huang said he was not at all surprised at the committee’s decision, but that he found its reasons “unimaginably queer.”
While the committee said the question did not comply with the Referendum Act (公民投票法), Huang said the committee did not have the right to review the proposed question.
“Next time, it will probably throw out a case for some other strange excuse, such as a typo or using an ugly font,” he said. “It is so ridiculous.”
Since taking committee members to court would be time consuming and appealing the case at the Executive Yuan’s Grievances Committee did not seem promising, Huang proposed Taiwan Advocates organize a debate and invite committee members to fully expound their position.
Wu Rong-i (吳榮義), former vice premier and now president of Taiwan Braintrust, urged the administration to exercise prudence when signing an ECFA.
“It is like a frog in slowly warming water, by the time the frog feels the heat, it is too late,” he said.
Wang To-far (王塗發), a professor of economics at National Taipei University, called on the public to come out and oppose the proposed accord.
He said an ECFA is a refurbished version of the Closer Economic Partnership Arrangement (CEPA) — a trade deal signed between Hong Kong and China.
“It is a special economic framework arrangement conspired by the Chinese Nationalist Party [KMT] and the Chinese Communist Party,” he said. “It will pave the way for a ‘one China’ market and ultimate unification with China.”
Citing the CEPA as an example, Wang said Hong Kong suffered an exodus of industries to China, especially manufacturing and services. After the manufacturing sector was hollowed out, unemployment soared and salaries deteriorated, widening the gap between rich and poor.
Taiwan is likely to end up like Hong Kong if an ECFA is signed, Wang said.
The Executive Yuan yesterday announced that registration for a one-time universal NT$10,000 cash handout to help people in Taiwan survive US tariffs and inflation would start on Nov. 5, with payouts available as early as Nov. 12. Who is eligible for the handout? Registered Taiwanese nationals are eligible, including those born in Taiwan before April 30 next year with a birth certificate. Non-registered nationals with residence permits, foreign permanent residents and foreign spouses of Taiwanese citizens with residence permits also qualify for the handouts. For people who meet the eligibility requirements, but passed away between yesterday and April 30 next year, surviving family members
The German city of Hamburg on Oct. 14 named a bridge “Kaohsiung-Brucke” after the Taiwanese city of Kaohsiung. The footbridge, formerly known as F566, is to the east of the Speicherstadt, the world’s largest warehouse district, and connects the Dar-es-Salaam-Platz to the Brooktorpromenade near the Port of Hamburg on the Elbe River. Timo Fischer, a Free Democratic Party member of the Hamburg-Mitte District Assembly, in May last year proposed the name change with support from members of the Social Democratic Party and the Christian Democratic Union. Kaohsiung and Hamburg in 1999 inked a sister city agreement, but despite more than a quarter-century of
Taiwanese officials are courting podcasters and influencers aligned with US President Donald Trump as they grow more worried the US leader could undermine Taiwanese interests in talks with China, people familiar with the matter said. Trump has said Taiwan would likely be on the agenda when he is expected to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) next week in a bid to resolve persistent trade tensions. China has asked the White House to officially declare it “opposes” Taiwanese independence, Bloomberg reported last month, a concession that would mark a major diplomatic win for Beijing. President William Lai (賴清德) and his top officials
‘ONE CHINA’: A statement that Berlin decides its own China policy did not seem to sit well with Beijing, which offered only one meeting with the German official German Minister for Foreign Affairs Johann Wadephul’s trip to China has been canceled, a spokesperson for his ministry said yesterday, amid rising tensions between the two nations, including over Taiwan. Wadephul had planned to address Chinese curbs on rare earths during his visit, but his comments about Berlin deciding on the “design” of its “one China” policy ahead of the trip appear to have rankled China. Asked about Wadephul’s comments, Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Guo Jiakun (郭嘉昆) said the “one China principle” has “no room for any self-definition.” In the interview published on Thursday, Wadephul said he would urge China to
RSS