Debate over whether the Legislative Yuan is to defer general interpellation in the new legislative session escalated yesterday following President Chen Shui-bian's (
Chen confirmed in a press conference yesterday that he had suggested that Wang Jin-pyng (
Chen said that he made the suggestion because lawmakers had just completed an interpellation session at the end of July in the previous legislative session.
Chen's confirmation was triggered by a statement made by Wang from the US on Sunday that Chen had proposed he arrange for such a delay so that Cabinet members would have time to get familiar with their jobs.
This roused fierce debate in the legislature yesterday. While opposition party lawmakers slammed Chen's idea, calling it "ridiculous," DPP legislators sided with the president, who is a DPP member.
"It's ridiculous to defer the interpellation so as to allow the Cabinet a long period of on-the-job training," said Chen Chen-sheng (
Chen's counterpart from the New Party, Lai Shyh-bao (
The Legislative Yuan holds two sessions each year -- the first session normally running from February to May and the second from September to December. The normal procedure is for lawmakers to question Cabinet members immediately after the completion of the Premier's administrative policy report, which usually takes place before the end of February and again before the end of September.
But Premier Tang Fei's (
Tseng Yung-chuan (
Perng Shaw-jiin (
The decision over the timing of the interpellation is contingent upon results of cross-party negotiations, if any, over the issue, Perng said.
Political analysts said while Chen's proposal is not flawed, legally speaking, it carries a political motivation that conflicts with opposition party interests.
Hwang Giin-tarng (
"Chen simply doesn't want to see the Cabinet being raked over the coals once again in the legislature -- at least not so soon. After all, that won't benefit his administration's image," Hwang said.
‘SECRETS’: While saying China would not attack during his presidency, Donald Trump declined to say how Washington would respond if Beijing were to take military action US President Donald Trump said that China would not take military action against Taiwan while he is president, as the Chinese leaders “know the consequences.” Trump made the statement during an interview on CBS’ 60 Minutes program that aired on Sunday, a few days after his meeting with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) in South Korea. “He [Xi] has openly said, and his people have openly said at meetings, ‘we would never do anything while President Trump is president,’ because they know the consequences,” Trump said in the interview. However, he repeatedly declined to say exactly how Washington would respond in
Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi said yesterday that China using armed force against Taiwan could constitute a "survival-threatening situation" for Japan, allowing the country to mobilize the Japanese armed forces under its security laws. Takaichi made the remarks during a parliamentary session yesterday while responding to a question about whether a "Taiwan contingency" involving a Chinese naval blockade would qualify as a "survival-threatening situation" for Japan, according to a report by Japan’s Asahi Shimbun. "If warships are used and other armed actions are involved, I believe this could constitute a survival- threatening
WARFARE: All sectors of society should recognize, unite, and collectively resist and condemn Beijing’s cross-border suppression, MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng said The number of Taiwanese detained because of legal affairs by Chinese authorities has tripled this year, as Beijing intensified its intimidation and division of Taiwanese by combining lawfare and cognitive warfare, the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) said yesterday. MAC Minister Chiu Chui-cheng (邱垂正) made the statement in response to questions by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Puma Shen (沈柏洋) about the government’s response to counter Chinese public opinion warfare, lawfare and psychological warfare. Shen said he is also being investigated by China for promoting “Taiwanese independence.” He was referring to a report published on Tuesday last week by China’s state-run Xinhua news agency,
‘ADDITIONAL CONDITION’: Taiwan will work with like-minded countries to protect its right to participate in next year’s meeting, the foreign ministry said The US will “continue to press China for security arrangements and protocols that safeguard all participants when attending APEC meetings in China,” a US Department of State spokesperson said yesterday, after Beijing suggested that members must adhere to its “one China principle” to participate. “The United States insists on the full and equal participation of all APEC member economies — including Taiwan — consistent with APEC’s guidelines, rules and established practice, as affirmed by China in its offer to host in 2026,” the unnamed spokesperson said in response to media queries about China putting a “one China” principle condition on Taiwan’s
RSS