China is preparing to arm its stealthiest submarines with nuclear missiles that could reach the US, cloaking its arsenal with the invisibility needed to retaliate in the event of an enemy strike.
Fifty years after China carried out its first nuclear test, patrols by the almost impossible-to-detect Jin-class submarines armed with nuclear JL–2 ballistic missiles will give Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) greater agility to respond to an attack.
The nuclear-powered subs will probably conduct initial patrols with the missiles by the end of this year, “giving China its first credible sea-based nuclear deterrent,” according to a report to the US Congress submitted last month by the US-China Economic and Security Review Commission.
Deploying the vessels will burnish China’s prestige as Xi seeks to end what he calls the “cold war” mentality that resulted in US dominance of Asia-Pacific security. Since coming to power, Xi has increased military spending with a focus on longer-range capacity, including plans to add to the country’s tally of a single aircraft carrier.
“For the first time in history, China’s nuclear arsenal will be invulnerable to a first strike,” said independent strategist Nicolas Giacometti, who has written analysis for The Diplomat and the Center for Strategic and International Studies. “It’s the last leap toward China’s assured nuclear-retaliation capability.”
China’s nuclear defense strategy is engineered to provide retaliation capability in the event of attack from nuclear powered nations as far away as the US, and also from Russia and India, according to Felix Chang, a senior fellow at the Foreign Policy Research Institute in Philadelphia.
While China does not view North Korea as a direct nuclear risk, officials are concerned about what might happen if North Korea threatened South Korea, or Japan and the region became unstable, Chang said.
China’s nuclear-armed submarines will be “useful as a hedge to any potential nuclear threats, including those from North Korea, even if they are relatively small,” he said.
The deployment of the submarines could pressure China to assure foreign militaries that its navy chiefs and political leaders can communicate with and control them. Chinese and US ships and planes are coming into greater proximity in the Pacific as China asserts its claims to territory in the South China Sea and East China Sea.
Former US secretary of defense Robert Gates said in an interview in January that former Chinese president Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) “did not have strong control” of the People’s Liberation Army.
The “best example,” Gates said, was China’s rollout of its J-20 stealth fighter jet during a visit he made in January 2010, which seemed to catch Hu unaware.
Since coming to power, Xi has tightened his grip on the military, taking over as head of the Central Military Commission (CMC) in November 2012, when he became Chinese Communist Party secretary-general. Hu waited about two years before becoming chairman of the commission.
“China is going to have to reassure their adversaries that those submarines are under positive control at all times,” said Malcolm Davis, an assistant professor of China-Western relations at Bond University in Australia.
“Positive control” refers to the procedures to ensure the commission’s absolute control of its nuclear assets, such as the authorization codes it would send to submarines, where, after verification by the commander and probably two other officers, missiles would be launched.
“It demands that China set up appropriate command and control infrastructure to ensure that the CMC can keep in touch with the submarines, even when they are at sea and under the water,” Davis said. “The US, UK, France and Russia all maintain such communications capabilities for ensuring positive control” of their submarines at sea.
By assuring potential enemies that weapons will only be fired if ordered by central command, China’s military would increase the deterrent value of its nuclear-armed submarines, he said.
“Those assurances are likely to be made at the highest level military-to-military meetings behind closed doors,” Davis said.
Otherwise China is largely expected to keep its nuclear capabilities secret.
“High-confidence assessments of the numbers of Chinese nuclear capable ballistic missiles and nuclear warheads are not possible due to China’s lack of transparency about its nuclear program,” the US report to Congress said.
The Pentagon has not provided an estimate of the size of China’s nuclear warhead stockpile since 2006, according to the report.
China’s Ministry of National Defense did not reply to faxed questions about when regular patrols by nuclear-armed Jin-class submarines would begin.
The modernization of China’s nuclear forces is focused on improving the capacity to deter other nuclear powers, said Giacometti, speaking by telephone from Brussels.
Until 2006, its only ballistic missile able to deliver a nuclear warhead to the continental US was the liquid-fueled, silo-based DF-5A, he said.
These were considered vulnerable because fueling takes a few hours during which the missile must remain in its silo. To protect them, China built mock silos and adopted a policy of secrecy that made disarming a first strike harder to execute.
In 2006, China introduced the land-based mobile DF-31A ballistic missiles, whose 11,200km maximum range could reach the US.
The missiles are solid-fueled, so can be fired almost immediately if warheads are pre-fitted, Giacometti said.
The US’ intelligence, surveillance and reconnaissance capabilities — from satellites to high-altitude drones, such as the Northrop Grumman RQ-4 Global Hawk — can monitor vast areas of territory and detect mobile intercontinental ballistic missile launchers, he said.
Any information gleaned could be transmitted to US strike assets to take out the launchers before they fire.
In comparison with the land-based launchers, nuclear-powered ballistic-missile submarines that rarely need to surface are much better at hiding. China has three of them — the Jin class — and is likely to add two more by 2020, according to the commission’s report.
Each could carry 12 JL-2 missiles, which after a decade of development “appear to have reached initial operational capability,” it said.
The JL–2’s range of about 7,400km means China could conduct nuclear strikes against Alaska if it unleashed the missiles from waters near China; against Alaska and Hawaii if launched from waters south of Japan; against Alaska, Hawaii and western continental US if fired from waters west of Hawaii; and against all 50 US states if launched from waters east of Hawaii, the report said.
“The big scoop would be determining where those submarine patrols will take place,” Chang said.
The submarines are expected to initially confine themselves to China’s coastal waters and the South China Sea where they could roam with little chance of detection.
For the missiles to reach Hawaii or the continental US, the submarines would need to foray into the western Pacific and beyond, which Davis said would be “more challenging because they’d have to run the gauntlet of US anti-submarine capabilities.”
China’s advances are cause for concern in some parts of the US defense establishment.
“We must continue to modernize our nuclear capabilities,” Admiral Harry Harris said on Tuesday last week at his nomination hearing to become commander of the US Pacific Command, when asked how the US should respond to China’s build up, adding that he considered North Korea to be the biggest threat to security in Asia.
Analysts do not expect China to modify its longstanding “no-first-use” nuclear policy that states its weapons will only be used if China comes under nuclear attack.
Having enhanced its nuclear-deterrence capability, China may begin to communicate more about the planned evolution of its nuclear forces, Giacometti said.
“More openness on China’s side might then open up more space for confidence-building measures and lay the ground for future arms control discussions,” he said.
Taiwan is projected to lose a working-age population of about 6.67 million people in two waves of retirement in the coming years, as the nation confronts accelerating demographic decline and a shortage of younger workers to take their place, the Ministry of the Interior said. Taiwan experienced its largest baby boom between 1958 and 1966, when the population grew by 3.78 million, followed by a second surge of 2.89 million between 1976 and 1982, ministry data showed. In 2023, the first of those baby boom generations — those born in the late 1950s and early 1960s — began to enter retirement, triggering
One of two tropical depressions that formed off Taiwan yesterday morning could turn into a moderate typhoon by the weekend, the Central Weather Administration (CWA) said yesterday. Tropical Depression No. 21 formed at 8am about 1,850km off the southeast coast, CWA forecaster Lee Meng-hsuan (李孟軒) said. The weather system is expected to move northwest as it builds momentum, possibly intensifying this weekend into a typhoon, which would be called Mitag, Lee said. The radius of the storm is expected to reach almost 200km, she said. It is forecast to approach the southeast of Taiwan on Monday next week and pass through the Bashi Channel
NO CHANGE: The TRA makes clear that the US does not consider the status of Taiwan to have been determined by WWII-era documents, a former AIT deputy director said The American Institute in Taiwan’s (AIT) comments that World War-II era documents do not determine Taiwan’s political status accurately conveyed the US’ stance, the US Department of State said. An AIT spokesperson on Saturday said that a Chinese official mischaracterized World War II-era documents as stating that Taiwan was ceded to the China. The remarks from the US’ de facto embassy in Taiwan drew criticism from the Ma Ying-jeou Foundation, whose director said the comments put Taiwan in danger. The Chinese-language United Daily News yesterday reported that a US State Department spokesperson confirmed the AIT’s position. They added that the US would continue to
The number of Chinese spouses applying for dependent residency as well as long-term residency in Taiwan has decreased, the Mainland Affairs Council said yesterday, adding that the reduction of Chinese spouses staying or living in Taiwan is only one facet reflecting the general decrease in the number of people willing to get married in Taiwan. The number of Chinese spouses applying for dependent residency last year was 7,123, down by 2,931, or 29.15 percent, from the previous year. The same census showed that the number of Chinese spouses applying for long-term residency and receiving approval last year stood at 2,973, down 1,520,