Tue, Oct 07, 2014 page1

• NTUH head stands firm on legitimacy of MG149

  ACCOUNTED FOR: Huang Kuan-tang told lawmakers that how Ko worded the account rules was ‘stupid,’ but said the account Ko stands accused of using illegally was ‘clean’

  • By Tu Chu-min and Jake Chung / Staff reporter, with staff writer
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  National Taiwan University Hospital (NTUH) president Huang Kuan-tang (黃冠棠) yesterday asserted that the hospital’s MG149 account was “clean,” as Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Legislator Lo Shu-lei (羅淑蕾) grilled him on the legality of the account she has accused independent Taipei mayoral candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) of using to perpetrate a host of illegal activities while employed at the hospital.

  Huang was questioned at a joint meeting held by the legislature’s Finance Committee and the Education and Culture Committee.

  The MG149 controversy exploded when Lo last month accused Ko of corruption, tax evasion and money laundering through his use of the shared account set up for the hospital’s Surgical Intensive Care Unit team while he headed the unit.

  

  National Taiwan University Hospital president Huang Kuan-tang, left, and chief accountant Yang Min-hsiu testify at a joint meeting of the legislature’s Finance Committee and Education and Culture Committee in Taipei yesterday.

  Photo: Liu Hsin-de, Taipei Times

  When Lo asked Huang about the use of terms such as “money laundering” in the wording of the internal guidelines regulating the MG149 account, Huang yesterday said he could not comment on that as it was a question of Ko’s personal style.

  Lo alleged that Ko wrote the rules himself, but he contends that he devised them with his team.

  When pressed by other KMT lawmakers on the same question, Huang said it had been a case of Ko acting “stupidly” (白目).

  Separately yesterday, Ko addressed the ongoing queries over the MG149 account by saying the government should not harass the hospital and traumatize its medical staff in an attempt to target him over the Taipei election on Nov. 29.

  Ko said the MG149 probe reminded him of the Yu Chang corruption scandal of 2012, saying that in that case, allegations had been used to attack then-Democratic Progressive Party presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) in the run-up to the election.

  In the Yu Chang case, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) accused Tsai of having an improper role in the formation of Yu Chang Biologics Co, now known as TaiMed Biologics Inc (中裕新藥). She was accused of manipulating investments by the National Development Fund in TaiMed while she was vice premier in 2007, leading to a series of investigations by the Control Yuan and the judiciary that ultimately cleared her of any wrongdoing.

  The KMT was never punished over Yu Chang, it only benefited from the incident; consequences which have led to the MG149 case today, Ko said yesterday.

  According to Ko, the hospital’s “402” account — its primary research funding account under which MG149 was opened — has been operating for two decades and every medical center has a similar account. The government should not seek to impede medical research over an election, he said.

  Addressing how the internal rules for the a MG149 account were not reported to the hospital, Ko said the regulations were a set of guidelines devised by him and his staff.

  “Why have unregulated use of funding when you can have a set of rules?” Ko said, adding that the guidelines are all in accordance with the hospital’s regulations.

  “I’m an honest man; besides, if I had wanted to do something illegal, why would I make all the rules in the first place?” Ko asked.

  The Taipei mayoral hopeful said his heart went out to former colleagues who have been questioned about the case.

  “These people are regular citizens who have been called into the District Prosecutors’ Office six or seven times,” Ko said, adding that they were suffering mental stress.

  Asked if he was worried that the prosecutors’ office would wait until the eve of election day to summon him for questioning, Ko said the judiciary is the last line of defense for citizens’ rights and should be trusted by the public.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    Palmeiras hopes for club cup win

  • 2

    Magnitude 6.4 earthquake hits Hualien County

  • 3

    Taiwan to see nine extended holidays in 2026

  • 4

    Pegatron ranks last in Greenpeace report

  • 5

    Hegseth outlines Chinese threat