Film director Chen Yu-hsun (陳玉勳) recently joined critics in denouncing what he called President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) “black-box operations” in signing a cross-strait service trade pact, questioning Ma’s motives for keeping the pact secret, while making known to the world that he has two colorectal polyps.
“Why keep the details of the cross-strait service trade agreement from the public and the Legislative Yuan, but announce to the world that two polyps had been found in the entrance of his anus?” Chen said in a message he posted on Facebook on Saturday night.
Chen was referring to a Presidential Office press release that day that said two colorectal polyps measuring 2mm in diameter were found 10cm and 25cm from Ma’s anus during his annual physical exam.
The press release triggered speculation that the government was trying to detract attention from the backlash against the service trade agreement inked in Shanghai on Friday. Chen’s message struck a chord with a number of netizens and attracted nearly 700 “likes” shortly after it was posted.
One netizen said Chen’s comment should make headlines, while another ridiculed Ma by saying that “the agreement only threatens the lives of others, but the two polyps could threaten the life of our president!”
In separate messages posted on his Facebook page on Saturday, Chen described Taiwanese representatives in charge of signing the agreement as “bastards” and criticized the pact as “a treaty that not only humiliates the nation, but also forfeits its sovereignty.”
Chen also shared a link to an online signature drive launched by the Taiwan Solidarity Union to recall Ma over the agreement, urging people to rise above their political affiliations and join him in deposing the president to prevent him from selling out the country.
However, Chen on Sunday hid the message concerning Ma’s health examination and instead shared a news story reporting that he had confronted and challenged Ma over the accord.
“Does my message constitute a challenge? I don’t think it does, because what Ma is doing is simply outrageous,” Chen said.
The agreement, under which China will open 80 of its service sectors to Taiwanese investors, while Taiwan will open 64 sectors, has triggered an outcry in affected industries, mainly because the government did not disclose details of the treaty or compile an impact assessment report on the deal’s potential effects before it was signed.
National policy adviser and publisher Rex How (郝明義) has also strongly criticized the Ma administration, saying it had failed to consult concerned sectors before signing the agreement, arrogantly ignored the industries’ demands and lacked sympathy for small and medium-sized enterprises.
“The publishing business is vigorous, diverse and creative in Taiwan, so we don’t fear competition from China, but we need the same degree of opening of the Chinese market,” he told a press conference yesterday in Taipei, where a number of Taiwanese publishers said the pact opened up the local market to Chinese publishers, while China has not promised the same degree of openness for Taiwanese publishers.
“We do not support an agreement that’s signed behind closed doors, without consulting the publishing business, without assessment of possible impacts and without mutual benefits,” How added.
Additonal reporting by Loa Iok-sin
‘NO SECURITY RISK’: The Railway Bureau reassured the public that the technicians’ activities were limited to technical guidance and did not involve sensitive systems The Railway Bureau yesterday said it had invited eight Chinese technicians to assist with an airport MRT construction project. The bureau issued the confirmation after an Internet user said Chinese nationals had entered the construction zone of Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport’s Terminal 3 project. They asked why “individuals from an enemy state” were allowed access to such a major national infrastructure project, which raised serious concerns over Taiwan’s industrial safety, sensitive systems and information security. The bureau’s Northern Region Engineering Branch Office said subcontractor Taiwan Handle Industrial Co (台灣手把工業) of the Taoyuan airport MRT’s “Contract No. CU05 Project A14 Station Civil, MEP &
The National Chungshan Institute of Science and Technology yesterday showcased its locally developed variants of the Vision 60 robotic patrol dog, which it plans to deploy on the nation’s outlying territories in the South China Sea. The variants were produced under the Joint Lab project — created by the institute and domestic companies — and assembled with domestically produced motors, lenses and artificial intelligence (AI) systems alongside licensed tech from the US, Missile and Rocket Systems Research Division deputy director Jen Kuo-kang (任國光) told the media event at a military base in Taipei’s Dazhi (大直) area. Taiwan has built up its strengths
TIT-FOR-TAT: The US allegedly revoked the visa of a Chinese national working at Xinhua News Agency in the US in response to Beijing’s expulsion of Vivian Wang The Presidential Office yesterday condemned China for expelling a New York Times correspondent from Beijing following the newspaper’s interview with President William Lai (賴清德), saying the move highlighted Beijing’s suppression of press freedom and its threat to international news media. Taiwan has noted a series of recent incidents in which Beijing used similar tactics to “threaten and pressure international media outlets and journalists,” Presidential Office spokeswoman Karen Kuo (郭雅慧) said in a statement. “This concerns not only press freedom and freedom of expression, but also the safety of journalists, and Taiwan and relevant partners are paying close attention to the situation,” she
NOT IMMEDIATE: Taiwan has a chance to appeal the proposed 10 percent tariff before it starts, while other countries face a 12.5 percent tariff from the trade office Taiwan is among 60 economies determined by the US to have failed to impose or enforce a ban on the importation of goods produced with forced labor, according to a notice released on Tuesday by the Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR), which proposed imposing an additional 10 percent or more tariff on them. The USTR in a statement said that following an investigation, it had determined under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 that the failure of the 60 economies to impose and effectively enforce a prohibition on the importation of goods produced with forced labor is