A legislative committee meeting descended into a fight yesterday as Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmakers clashed over two proposed bills that would recognize Chinese diplomas and allow Chinese students to study in Taiwan.
DPP legislators occupied the podium at around 7am — more than two hours before the meeting was scheduled to begin — and took control of the microphones in a bid to paralyze the meeting of the Education and Culture Committee.
When Minister of Education Wu Ching-ji (吳清基) arrived, the lawmakers surrounded him, accusing him of trying to sell out Taiwan by opening it to Chinese students.
PHOTO: CHIEN JUNG-FONG, TAIPEI TIMES
Physical clashes erupted as DPP lawmakers tried to prevent committee head and KMT caucus member Chao Li-yun (趙麗雲) from getting to the convener's podium to announce the meeting's agenda.
DPP legislators Hsueh Ling (薛凌) and Chen Ting-fei (陳亭妃) tried to stop Chao by covering Chao's mouth, while some KMT legislators tried to shield Chao.
Wu gave the committee a short briefing on the two bills, while the conflict between the KMT and the DPP continued, with some legislators jumping onto the desks and shouting at each other.
Chao surprised many by fainting shortly after announcing that the two bills would be put to cross-party negotiations — a necessary procedure before a bill is put to a second reading.
She was rushed to National Taiwan University Hospital (NTUH). DPP Legislator Kuan Bi-ling (管碧玲) and Chen also took an ambulance to NTUH for medical checkups. The meeting was adjourned shortly afterwards.
Wu later said he regretted the incident and condemned the use of violence.
DPP Legislator Chen Ying (陳瑩) accused Chao of faking her collapse, saying: “I heard other KMT lawmakers telling her to faint.”
The KMT caucus, however, accused the DPP of resorting to violence.
KMT caucus whip Lin Yi-shih (林益世) called the DPP “psycho” and told DPP lawmakers to go see a psychiatrist.
President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) visited Chao in hospital yesterday evening.
Taiwan currently does not recognize Chinese credentials or allow Chinese students to study in the country, but Chinese students can apply to come for short-term research purposes.
The KMT administration wants to start recruiting students from China in September, but the DPP has been boycotting the bills.
The two parties are also divided as to whether the committee completed the preliminary review of the two bills during yesterday's clashes.
Lin said the bills had passed the preliminary review because Chao had announced the referral of the bills to the plenary session. The DPP, however, questioned the legitimacy of yesterday's meeting, saying the committee failed to complete a preliminary review of the bills.
In response to the scuffles, DPP Chairperson Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) said that the problem began because the KMT attempted to ram its bill through the legislature without a cross-party consensus.
“It's disappointing that the KMT blames the opposition for the scuffles, when it hasn't even tried to exchange opinions,” Tsai said.
The DPP said it opposes the bill on easing restrictions for Chinese students because it is closely tied to another proposed bill on recognizing Chinese educational credentials, which it said would hasten Taiwan's brain drain and see Taiwanese workers compete with their Chinese counterparts for jobs.
Lawmakers have yet to achieve a consensus on such a measure, the chairperson said.
“If you open our schools to Chinese students today, you will have to recognize their certifications or their degrees. After all, how will they apply to our universities or grad schools otherwise?” DPP Spokesperson Tsai Chi-chang (蔡其昌) said.
“We haven't seen the Ma administration make any studies or take measures to deal with the proposal's potential impact,” Tsai Chi-chang said.
Meanwhile, responding to the allegations that she supported a similar measure during her tenure as Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) chief from 2000 to 2004, Tsai Ing-wen said that the proposal she supported would only see Chinese students come to Taiwan for exchanges — not full-time study.
“I said that both Chinese and Taiwanese students should partake in more exchanges in universities or institutions. A major difference is that this does not involve recognizing Chinese educational degrees,” Tsai Ing-wen said.
ADDITIONAL REPORTING BY MO YAN-CHIH
The US Department of State yesterday criticized Beijing over its misrepresentation of the US’ “one China” policy in the latest diplomatic salvo between the two countries over a bid by Taiwan to regain its observer status at the World Health Assembly, the decisionmaking body of the WHO. “The PRC [People’s Republic of China] continues to publicly misrepresent U.S. policy,” Department of State spokesman Ned Price wrote on Twitter. “The United States does not subscribe to the PRC’s ‘one China principle’ — we remain committed to our longstanding, bipartisan one China policy, guided by the Taiwan Relations Act, Three Joint Communiques, and
FATES LINKED: The US president said that sanctions on Russia over Ukraine must exact a ‘long-term price,’ because otherwise ‘what signal does that send to China?’ US President Joe Biden yesterday vowed that US forces would defend Taiwan militarily in the event of a Chinese attack in his strongest statement to date on the issue. Beijing is already “flirting with danger,” Biden said following talks with Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida in Tokyo, in which the pair agreed to monitor Chinese naval activity and joint Chinese-Russian exercises. Asked if Washington was willing to get involved militarily to defend Taiwan, he replied: “Yes.” “That’s the commitment we made,” Biden said. “We agreed with the ‘one China’ policy, we signed on to it ... but the idea that it can be
SUBTLE? While Biden said the US policy of ‘strategic ambiguity’ on Taiwan had not changed, the group targeted China and Russia without naming them Leaders of Australia, India, Japan and the US yesterday warned against attempts to “change the status quo by force,” as concerns grow about whether China could invade Taiwan. The issue of Taiwan loomed over a leadership meeting in Tokyo of the Quadrilateral Security Dialogue (Quad) nations — the US, Japan, Australia and India — who stressed their determination to ensure a free and open Indo-Pacific region in the face of an increasingly assertive China, although Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida said the group was not targeting any one country. The four leaders said in a joint statement issued after their talks
Nearly half of Taiwanese believe President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) has not done enough to prepare the nation against Chinese aggression, the a poll released yesterday by the Taiwanese Public Opinion Foundation showed. Asked whether the Tsai administration’s military and non-military preparations to defend Taiwan are adequate, 30.6 percent said they were “mostly inadequate” and 18.9 percent said they “very inadequate,” while 25.7 percent said they were “mostly adequate” and 7.1 percent said they were “very adequate.” Another 17.6 percent had no opinion or did not know enough to form a judgement. Still, 51 percent of respondents approved of Tsai’s national defense policy,
RSS