The Ministry of the Interior is offering a reward of NT$1 million to anyone who can come up with a slogan that would make people more willing to have children. While this may be a well-intended idea, the fundamental solution to this problem would be to actively search for answers as to why Taiwanese decide not to have children.
Negative factors such as a sluggish economy, political tensions, problems in the education system and the gradual degradation of the environment have contributed to a fear of having children.
Also, Taiwanese society is not very friendly to women.
On the surface, women’s rights in Taiwan are no less than in other dweveloped countries, and Taiwanese women are among the most highly educated in Asia. However, on closer inspection, it is easy to see that women are still restricted by traditional attitudes that limit their right to work and have a major influence on the choices they can make about giving birth.
For example, while the government has set up a system to subsidize women taking unpaid leave to care for their infants, the many restrictions placed on working women in the past mean that they are still unable to have children and care for them without having to worry about their jobs. In interviews, most employed women say that while the government’s policies are good, they still worry about losing their jobs.
If employers cannot ensure the rights of female employees to have children, the willingness to have children will probably continue to drop.
Second, the government has been promoting gender equality for years. The policy has been effective to some extent and women have gradually managed to cast off past stereotypes of women as housewives and they are now competing with men in the workplace.
However, the traditional view that men should work and women stay at home remains deeply ingrained in people’s minds and the view in many families is still that women are predestined to look after children.
Many career women have to do housework when they get home from work, prepare meals, wash clothes, look after their children and help them with homework while the husband sits around and relaxes, at most doing a token chore. Obviously, if we want to increase the willingness of women to have children, men must learn to share the housework and be gentler and more considerate.
Another backward concept that keeps women from having children is the view that boys are more important than girls. As the quality of the education system has improved, education has become a very expensive project that causes the average couple to worry about having too many children. However, the older generation still thinks a boy is needed to continue the family line and some even think more children and grandchildren will bring greater luck. Therefore, women are often pressured to bear a boy or a few more children before “it is enough.”
Having children has thus become an endless nightmare that scares many women away from marriage.
Is it so strange, then, that the fertility rate keeps falling?
Our culture still holds many prejudices against women. As soon as women are able to resist these prejudices, they will stop playing along. If I were a woman, I would not want to have a family, unless these old cultural habits were eradicated. Instead of coming up with slogans, the ministry must find ways of creating an environment that is friendlier to women and that will let them feel that motherhood is a happy and rewarding experience.
Hsu Yu-fang is an associate professor and chairman of the department of Chinese at National Dong Hwa University.
TRANSLATED BY DREW CAMERON
Elbridge Colby, America’s Under Secretary of Defense for Policy, is the most influential voice on defense strategy in the Second Trump Administration. For insight into his thinking, one could do no better than read his thoughts on the defense of Taiwan which he gathered in a book he wrote in 2021. The Strategy of Denial, is his contemplation of China’s rising hegemony in Asia and on how to deter China from invading Taiwan. Allowing China to absorb Taiwan, he wrote, would open the entire Indo-Pacific region to Chinese preeminence and result in a power transition that would place America’s prosperity
A few weeks ago in Kaohsiung, tech mogul turned political pundit Robert Tsao (曹興誠) joined Western Washington University professor Chen Shih-fen (陳時奮) for a public forum in support of Taiwan’s recall campaign. Kaohsiung, already the most Taiwanese independence-minded city in Taiwan, was not in need of a recall. So Chen took a different approach: He made the case that unification with China would be too expensive to work. The argument was unusual. Most of the time, we hear that Taiwan should remain free out of respect for democracy and self-determination, but cost? That is not part of the usual script, and
All 24 Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) lawmakers and suspended Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安), formerly of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), survived recall elections against them on Saturday, in a massive loss to the unprecedented mass recall movement, as well as to the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) that backed it. The outcome has surprised many, as most analysts expected that at least a few legislators would be ousted. Over the past few months, dedicated and passionate civic groups gathered more than 1 million signatures to recall KMT lawmakers, an extraordinary achievement that many believed would be enough to remove at
Behind the gloating, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) must be letting out a big sigh of relief. Its powerful party machine saved the day, but it took that much effort just to survive a challenge mounted by a humble group of active citizens, and in areas where the KMT is historically strong. On the other hand, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) must now realize how toxic a brand it has become to many voters. The campaigners’ amateurism is what made them feel valid and authentic, but when the DPP belatedly inserted itself into the campaign, it did more harm than good. The