The two “China” parties — the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) — say they only want what is best for Taiwan when it comes to trade and economic exchanges across the Taiwan Strait. Chinese officials have even said that Taiwanese businesspeople go to China to make money off the backs of the Chinese.
However, Straits Exchange Foundation (SEF) Chairman Chiang Pin-kung (江丙坤) and SEF Secretary-General Kao Koong-lian (高孔廉) have exposed the claims for the lies that they are. Chiang has said that “over the past 20 years, Taiwanese investment in China has exceeded NT$4.8 trillion [US$148.7 billion], and so it cannot be denied that China’s economic growth owes a lot to Taiwanese businesspeople.” Kao has said that “Taiwan was opened up to Chinese investment in June, but to date, investments only stand at NT$1.19 billion, not a very large sum.”
Putting it more bluntly, investment by Taiwanese businesspeople in China is a bit like trying to scare off dogs by throwing food at them. As Chinese officials would have it, Taiwanese businesspeople enjoy preferential investment conditions in China, as if to say that Taiwan is enjoying unilateral benefits while China is making sacrifices for the sake of Taiwan.
What is the reality? China-bound Taiwanese investors are sacrificing Taiwan and helping China achieve its goals.
Over the past 20 years, Taiwan’s economic development has dropped to negative growth, unemployment has reached new heights with no signs of falling and salaries have fallen to the levels of 13 years ago, while China’s economy continues to grow at double-digit rates. It is also rapidly increasing the number of missiles it has aimed at Taiwan and claims that it will “buy Taiwan.” The question is whether this situation is beneficial to Taiwan, or to China.
As far as the government is concerned, Chinese investment in Taiwan is limited, and the way to deal with this is to deregulate even more areas. This is suicidal. We must not place any hope in Chinese investment: The more there is, the greater the danger to Taiwan. On the one hand, Chinese investment is fueling housing prices and the stock market, increasing the suffering of Taiwanese while doing nothing to create local employment. On the other hand, these investments are used to buy up Taiwanese businesses and gradually gain control over the economy. Chinese are even buying up media outlets through returning Taiwanese businesspeople to promote unification and oppose independence. Their involvement in local elections is even more frightening.
Association for Relations Across the Taiwan Strait (ARATS) Chairman Chen Yunlin (陳雲林) responded to Chiang and Kao by saying that many Chinese businesspeople have told him they are worried about frequent protests in Taiwan, which they find frightening.
However, Beijing has total control over whether there will be any Chinese investment in Taiwan, and whether Chinese money will flow in or out of Taiwan. The best example of this is when the Chinese government banned Chinese tourists from visiting Kaohsiung after the Australian documentary about exiled Uighur leader Rebiya Kadeer was screened at the Kaohsiung Film Festival earlier this year.
In the same way, Chinese investments are used to whet the appetite of President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and entice him to make even more concessions so that China can gain leverage over Taiwan’s sovereignty in the same way that it has gained leverage in the Taiwanese economy.
It is worth noting that China feels the NT$4.8 trillion it has attracted from Taiwanese businesses is not enough. Chen said that if traditional small and medium-sized companies in southern Taiwan cooperated with privately run companies in Jiangsu or Zhejiang provinces, they could work together to make their money off foreigners.
This may be true, but while Chinese companies would be guaranteed to turn a profit, the companies from southern Taiwan would be more likely to be guaranteed endless suffering and problems. If they were to cooperate with Chinese companies, workers in southern Taiwan would become dependent on Chinese officials for their paychecks, and that could change the political landscape in southern Taiwan.
Chen has been called the main culprit behind the persecution of Taiwanese businesspeople in China by those who have suffered such problems. Now he has been in Taiwan to ply his trade. Doesn’t that make the government his accomplices?
Those who harbor illusions about Chinese investments in Taiwan should remember the painful lesson learned by many Taiwanese businesses that invested in China and sacrificed Taiwan over the past 20 years only to help China achieve its goals while themselves struggling to survive. Taiwanese are increasingly questioning the proposed cross-strait economic cooperation framework agreement (ECFA), and in an opinion poll conducted by the Chinese-language Wealth Magazine, 29 percent of respondents supported signing an ECFA, while 54 percent worried that they or members of their family would lose their jobs after such an agreement is signed.
This is clear evidence that the public isn’t fooled so easily. Taiwan and China have moved closer over the past 20 years, and investments and trade have increased. The resulting factor price equalization has led to Taiwanese salaries and incomes being pulled down by China. Ma is well aware of this, but he still persists in pushing for closer economic and trade relations with China, and mobilized a massive police force to protect Chen during his visit, which was aimed at attracting more Taiwanese businesspeople as a part of China’s unification strategy. The only explanation is that he wants to thoroughly equalize Taiwan and China to pave the way for eventual unification, which would stifle and kill Taiwan.
TRANSLATED BY PERRY SVENSSON
There is much evidence that the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) is sending soldiers from the People’s Liberation Army (PLA) to support Russia’s invasion of Ukraine — and is learning lessons for a future war against Taiwan. Until now, the CCP has claimed that they have not sent PLA personnel to support Russian aggression. On 18 April, Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelinskiy announced that the CCP is supplying war supplies such as gunpowder, artillery, and weapons subcomponents to Russia. When Zelinskiy announced on 9 April that the Ukrainian Army had captured two Chinese nationals fighting with Russians on the front line with details
Within Taiwan’s education system exists a long-standing and deep-rooted culture of falsification. In the past month, a large number of “ghost signatures” — signatures using the names of deceased people — appeared on recall petitions submitted by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) against Democratic Progressive Party legislators Rosalia Wu (吳思瑤) and Wu Pei-yi (吳沛憶). An investigation revealed a high degree of overlap between the deceased signatories and the KMT’s membership roster. It also showed that documents had been forged. However, that culture of cheating and fabrication did not just appear out of thin air — it is linked to the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), joined by the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), held a protest on Saturday on Ketagalan Boulevard in Taipei. They were essentially standing for the Chinese Communist Party (CCP), which is anxious about the mass recall campaign against KMT legislators. President William Lai (賴清德) said that if the opposition parties truly wanted to fight dictatorship, they should do so in Tiananmen Square — and at the very least, refrain from groveling to Chinese officials during their visits to China, alluding to meetings between KMT members and Chinese authorities. Now that China has been defined as a foreign hostile force,
On April 19, former president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) gave a public speech, his first in about 17 years. During the address at the Ketagalan Institute in Taipei, Chen’s words were vague and his tone was sour. He said that democracy should not be used as an echo chamber for a single politician, that people must be tolerant of other views, that the president should not act as a dictator and that the judiciary should not get involved in politics. He then went on to say that others with different opinions should not be criticized as “XX fellow travelers,” in reference to
RSS