China lashed a US decision to impose duties on Chinese-made tires, calling it flagrant protectionism that sends the wrong signal before the next G20 summit and risks a “chain reaction” that could slow global recovery.
“China strongly condemns this grave act of trade protectionism by the US,” Chinese Ministry of Commerce Spokesman Yao Jian (姚堅) said in a statement issued on the ministry Web site yesterday, hours after the administration of US President Barack Obama announced the move.
The new duty of 35 percent will take effect on Sept. 26 and adds to an existing 4 percent duty. The extra duty will fall to 30 percent in the second year and 25 percent in the third year.
Those levels are lower than the US International Trade Commission recommended earlier this year, but likely high enough to restrict tire imports significantly from China, if not shut them out completely.
“The president decided to remedy the clear disruption to the US tire industry based on the facts and the law in this case,” White House Spokesman Robert Gibbs said in a statement.
The United Steelworkers union, which represents workers at many US tire production plants, filed a petition earlier this year asking for the protection.
It said a tripling of tire imports from China to about 46 million last year from about 15 million in 2004 had cost more than 5,000 US tire worker jobs.
Beijing’s reaction was unusually detailed and vehement.
“This step not only violates the rules of the WTO, it is also contrary to the relevant commitments that the United States government made at the G20 financial summit,” Yao said.
He accused the Obama administration of trade protection measures without sufficient proof and of bowing before domestic protectionist forces.
“This step has harmed China, as well as harming US interests, and even more, it sends the wrong trade protectionist signal to the world before the Pittsburgh summit,” he said.
Obama, Chinese President Hu Jintao (胡錦濤) and other leaders will meet for the next G20 summit of major rich and developing economies in Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania, later this month.
Yao said the duties could spark a “chain reaction of trade protectionist measures that could slow the current pace of revival in the world economy.”
China has increasingly turned to domestic demand to shore up its growth during the global economic slump.
But for now, exports remain a key part of China’s economic engine, and its relatively cheap exports to the US have long faced complaints from US manufacturing groups and trade unions who say Beijing is unfairly overwhelming other competitors.
Yao said there was no evidence of that in the tire case, and he said Beijing could take its complaint to the WTO.
No US tire manufacturer supported the case and one, Cooper Tire, publicly opposed it.
David Spooner, outside counsel for the Chinese tire industry, said: “These tariffs are unwarranted. It’s troubling that the administration would invoke an import surge safeguard over the objections of US industry and in response to falling imports. Not a single US tire company supports these taxes.”
US tire wholesalers and retailers also warned a double-digit duty would cause them to cut jobs.
They argued that major US tire manufacturers no longer wanted to produce the low-priced tires imported from China.
“We are certainly disheartened that the president bowed to the union and disregarded the interests of thousands of other American workers and consumers,” said Marguerite Trossevin, counsel to the American Coalition for Free Trade in Tires.
LIMITS: While China increases military pressure on Taiwan and expands its use of cognitive warfare, it is unwilling to target tech supply chains, the report said US and Taiwan military officials have warned that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) could implement a blockade within “a matter of hours” and need only “minimal conversion time” prior to an attack on Taiwan, a report released on Tuesday by the US Senate’s China Economic and Security Review Commission said. “While there is no indication that China is planning an imminent attack, the United States and its allies and partners can no longer assume that a Taiwan contingency is a distant possibility for which they would have ample time to prepare,” it said. The commission made the comments in its annual
DETERMINATION: Beijing’s actions toward Tokyo have drawn international attention, but would likely bolster regional coordination and defense networks, the report said Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s administration is likely to prioritize security reforms and deterrence in the face of recent “hybrid” threats from China, the National Security Bureau (NSB) said. The bureau made the assessment in a written report to the Legislative Yuan ahead of an oral report and questions-and-answers session at the legislature’s Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee tomorrow. The key points of Japan’s security reforms would be to reinforce security cooperation with the US, including enhancing defense deployment in the first island chain, pushing forward the integrated command and operations of the Japan Self-Defense Forces and US Forces Japan, as
INTERCEPTION: The 30km test ceiling shows that the CSIST is capable of producing missiles that could stop inbound missiles as they re-enter the atmosphere Recent missile tests by the Chungshan Institute of Science and Technology (CSIST) show that Taiwan’s missiles are capable of intercepting ballistic missiles as they re-enter the atmosphere and pose a significant deterrent to Chinese missile threats, former Hsiung Feng III missile development project chief engineer Chang Cheng (張誠) said yesterday. The military-affiliated institute has been conducting missile tests, believed to be related to Project Chiang Kung (強弓) at Pingtung County’s Jiupeng Military Base, with many tests deviating from past practices of setting restriction zones at “unlimited” and instead clearly stating a 30.48km range, Chang said. “Unlimited” restrictions zones for missile tests is
NO CHANGES: A Japanese spokesperson said that Tokyo remains consistent and open for dialogue, while Beijing has canceled diplomatic engagements A Japanese official blasted China’s claims that Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi has altered Japan’s position on a Taiwan crisis as “entirely baseless,” calling for more dialogue to stop ties between Asia’s top economies from spiraling. China vowed to take resolute self-defense against Japan if it “dared to intervene militarily in the Taiwan Strait” in a letter delivered Friday to the UN. “I’m aware of this letter,” said Maki Kobayashi, a senior Japanese government spokeswoman. “The claim our country has altered its position is entirely baseless,” she said on the sidelines of the G20 summit in Johannesburg on Saturday. The Chinese Ministry