President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) said yesterday he found it a consolation that the nation’s title at the Olympic Games and arrangements for the opening ceremony procession have been resolved, voicing hope that there would be no controversies before the Beijing Games begin.
“Disputes over the designation of Taiwan’s Olympic team ... and its order of appearance at the opening ceremony have been resolved,” Ma said while visiting the National Sports Training Center in Zuoying (左營), Kaohsiung City, to present a national flag to the nation’s Olympic delegation.
Ma was referring to the notice received on Tuesday that the the Games’ opening procession on Aug. 8 will be arranged based on stroke number in in the first character of each country or territory’s name in simplified Chinese.
Under this system, Taiwan will be the 24th team to enter the stadium after Japan and before the Central African Republic and Hong Kong.
In the past, the Greek delegation has led the procession, followed by the rest of the teams in alphabetical order in the language of the host country, except for the host team, which is traditionally the final team.
Based on a protocol signed in 1981 between the Chinese Taipei Olympic Committee and the International Olympic Committee (IOC), the “Chinese Taipei Olympic Committee” was abbreviated as “TPE” and therefore listed under the “T” section in the IOC’s directory and in the processions.
Ma said he was glad that both sides handled the matter in the spirit of “shelving differences and creating a win-win situation” and he hoped the Olympics would come off without a hitch because Beijing has been working hard to make it a success.
Meanwhile, Presidential Office Spokesman Wang Yu-chi (王郁琦) said the Beijing line-up would be acceptable if the arrangement was made in accordance with Olympic regulations and precedents, when he was asked if the Presidential Office considered the arrangement an attempt to denigrate Taiwan’s sovereignty.
Some have expressed concern that the arrangement might set an example for other countries, but Wang said cross-strait relations were improving and both sides extended goodwill to each other.
It was unnecessary for Taiwan to predict what would happen in the future, he said, adding that the Presidential Office believed both sides would find a suitable model that was mutually beneficial if both sides showed each other respect.
Executive Yuan Spokeswoman Vanessa Shih (史亞平) said the government had negotiated on an equal footing with China on Taiwan’s title at the Olympic Games and the placement of its athletes in the march.
The procession arrangements are in line with IOC regulations and the government does not see them as a bid to downgrade the country’s dignity, she said.
The government made it very clear during the negotiations that the arrangements were a “one time” deal and would not be applied to other competitions, she said.
The Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), however, accused China of trying to downgrade Taiwan’s status to that of an administrative region of China.
The “Chinese Taipei” team and Hong Kong’s “Hong Kong, China” team — Zhonghua Taibei (中華台北) and Zhongguo Xianggang (中國香港) — will be very close to each other.
Although Taiwan will not be grouped with China in the procession, the DPP was concerned a precedent would be set of Taiwan being grouped with China and Hong Kong in future Olympics and other international sports events.
DPP Legislator Kuan Bi-ling (管碧玲) said Taiwan should not accept the arrangement even though Beijing said it would position the Central African Republic between Taiwan and Hong Kong.
She said there was no guarantee that China would not change the order to place Taiwan’s team next to Hong Kong’s.
“China should stop playing with words using Chinese characters,” DPP Legislator Pan Men-an (潘孟安) said.
When asked if Taiwan had been downgraded, DPP Chairwoman Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文), on leaving the party’s Central Standing Committee meeting, sighed and said “the Presidential Office has been setting a low standard.”
The DPP caucus also condemned KMT Chairman Wu Poh-hsiung’s (吳伯雄) decision to attend the Olympic opening ceremony.
“It is unbelievable” that while the Ministry of Foreign Affairs urged the heads of Taiwan’s allies not to attend the Beijing Olympics, the chairman of the country’s governing party is going, DPP Legislator Gao Jyh-peng (高志鵬) said.
Unless Wu is allowed to display the Republic of China’s (ROC) flag and promote Taiwan’s sovereignty at the ceremony, there would be no need for Wu to take part, Gao said
Under the 1981 protocol, the ROC flag and national anthem cannot be used at official venues of the competition.
Wu responded to the DPP’s complaints by urging the party to stop its “smear campaign.”
“What has the DPP done for our Olympic team in the past eight years? At least the KMT is fighting for more space for ‘Chinese Taipei’” Wu said before presiding over the party’s Central Standing Committee meeting.
Additional reporting by Mo Yan-chih
MORE VISITORS: The Tourism Administration said that it is seeing positive prospects in its efforts to expand the tourism market in North America and Europe Taiwan has been ranked as the cheapest place in the world to travel to this year, based on a list recommended by NerdWallet. The San Francisco-based personal finance company said that Taiwan topped the list of 16 nations it chose for budget travelers because US tourists do not need visas and travelers can easily have a good meal for less than US$10. A bus ride in Taipei costs just under US$0.50, while subway rides start at US$0.60, the firm said, adding that public transportation in Taiwan is easy to navigate. The firm also called Taiwan a “food lover’s paradise,” citing inexpensive breakfast stalls
TRADE: A mandatory declaration of origin for manufactured goods bound for the US is to take effect on May 7 to block China from exploiting Taiwan’s trade channels All products manufactured in Taiwan and exported to the US must include a signed declaration of origin starting on May 7, the Bureau of Foreign Trade announced yesterday. US President Donald Trump on April 2 imposed a 32 percent tariff on imports from Taiwan, but one week later announced a 90-day pause on its implementation. However, a universal 10 percent tariff was immediately applied to most imports from around the world. On April 12, the Trump administration further exempted computers, smartphones and semiconductors from the new tariffs. In response, President William Lai’s (賴清德) administration has introduced a series of countermeasures to support affected
CROSS-STRAIT: The vast majority of Taiwanese support maintaining the ‘status quo,’ while concern is rising about Beijing’s influence operations More than eight out of 10 Taiwanese reject Beijing’s “one country, two systems” framework for cross-strait relations, according to a survey released by the Mainland Affairs Council (MAC) on Thursday. The MAC’s latest quarterly survey found that 84.4 percent of respondents opposed Beijing’s “one country, two systems” formula for handling cross-strait relations — a figure consistent with past polling. Over the past three years, opposition to the framework has remained high, ranging from a low of 83.6 percent in April 2023 to a peak of 89.6 percent in April last year. In the most recent poll, 82.5 percent also rejected China’s
PLUGGING HOLES: The amendments would bring the legislation in line with systems found in other countries such as Japan and the US, Legislator Chen Kuan-ting said Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Chen Kuan-ting (陳冠廷) has proposed amending national security legislation amid a spate of espionage cases. Potential gaps in security vetting procedures for personnel with access to sensitive information prompted him to propose the amendments, which would introduce changes to Article 14 of the Classified National Security Information Protection Act (國家機密保護法), Chen said yesterday. The proposal, which aims to enhance interagency vetting procedures and reduce the risk of classified information leaks, would establish a comprehensive security clearance system in Taiwan, he said. The amendment would require character and loyalty checks for civil servants and intelligence personnel prior to