A top Indonesian court ruled yesterday an anti-terror law used to convict the Bali bombers violated the Constitution, a decision which could open the way for fresh appeals by jailed extremists.
A senior justice ministry official said the constitutional court's ruling does not overturn the convictions of the al-Qaeda-linked militants behind the nightclub bombings which killed 202 people on the holiday island.
But one of the lawyers who brought the test case, Wirawan Adnan, said it provides new grounds for appeals by convicted Bali bombers who face a firing squad, as well as by lower-level players.
He said lawyers would seek a judicial review of all appeals rejected by the supreme court, including those of Amrozi and Imam Samudra, after the constitutional court ruled that the retroactive anti-terror law is unconstitutional.
"We will also file appeals to all cases which have been decided in the district courts, by using the same argument," Adnan said.
Amrozi and Samudra, along with a man called Mukhlas, are under sentence of death for their key roles in the worst terrorist attack since Sept. 11, 2001 in the US.
The court was considering an appeal by Masykur Abdul Kadir, who was jailed for 15 years for helping the bombers. He claimed a subsidiary law which made the main anti-terror law retroactive -- to cover the Bali attack -- breaches the constitution.
The judges, by a five to four majority, agreed.
"Convictions which have been handed down and which have permanent legal force will still be in force," said Abdul Gani Abdullah, the justice ministry's director general of legislation.
"But unfinished cases can no longer use Law No. 16 [on retroactivity] but must instead use the criminal code."
Abdullah said defense lawyers can seek judicial reviews "but they must have new evidence and a constitutional court ruling cannot be considered as new evidence. A judicial review does not get in the way of the execution of a verdict."
A court spokeswoman said the judges had only struck down the retroactive provision and not the anti-terror law itself.
Numerous other terror suspects, including those charged over the Marriott hotel bombing which killed 12 people in Jakarta last August, are on trial or have been convicted under the legislation.
The government of the world's largest Muslim-populated nation was long accused of shutting its eyes to the extremist threat. But just a week after the Bali blasts of October 2002 which killed mainly Western holidaymakers, it rushed through an anti-terror decree.
The decree, which authorizes death for terrorism and limited detention without trial, was formalized into a law the following year.
Courts in Bali convicted 33 people for the nightclub blasts. Apart from the three sentenced to death, they received sentences ranging from life three years.
Indonesia is also preparing to put Islamic cleric Abu Bakar Bashir on trial again. Police say they have new evidence that he led the Jemaah Islamiyah terror group, which has staged a string of bloody attacks including the Bali blasts.
One of the cleric's lawyers said he should be freed.
"The constitutional court's ruling today shows that he can no longer be put on trial under the anti-terror law, particularly by linking him with the Bali bombing," the lawyer told reporters.
Brigadier General Pranowo, a director of a police anti-terror unit, said the ruling was "clearly very disappointing."
"It could create a legal impact on other terrorism cases. I will have to analyze this further with my team," he said.
The judges referred to an article in the constitution which lists "the right not to be tried under a law with retrospective effect" as an inalienable human right.
They said international and domestic law did not categorize terrorism as an extraordinary crime warranting retroactivity.

PEACE AND STABILITY: Maintaining the cross-strait ‘status quo’ has long been the government’s position, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs said Taiwan is committed to maintaining the cross-strait “status quo” and seeks no escalation of tensions, the Ministry of Foreign Affairs (MOFA) said yesterday, rebutting a Time magazine opinion piece that described President William Lai (賴清德) as a “reckless leader.” The article, titled “The US Must Beware of Taiwan’s Reckless Leader,” was written by Lyle Goldstein, director of the Asia Program at the Washington-based Defense Priorities think tank. Goldstein wrote that Taiwan is “the world’s most dangerous flashpoint” amid ongoing conflicts in the Middle East and Russia’s invasion of Ukraine. He said that the situation in the Taiwan Strait has become less stable

Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi yesterday lavished US President Donald Trump with praise and vows of a “golden age” of ties on his visit to Tokyo, before inking a deal with Washington aimed at securing critical minerals. Takaichi — Japan’s first female prime minister — pulled out all the stops for Trump in her opening test on the international stage and even announced that she would nominate him for a Nobel Peace Prize, the White House said. Trump has become increasingly focused on the Nobel since his return to power in January and claims to have ended several conflicts around the world,

REASSURANCE: The US said Taiwan’s interests would not be harmed during the talk and that it remains steadfast in its support for the nation, the foreign minister said US President Donald Trump on Friday said he would bring up Taiwan with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) during a meeting on the sidelines of the APEC Summit in South Korea this week. “I will be talking about Taiwan [with Xi],” Trump told reporters before he departed for his trip to Asia, adding that he had “a lot of respect for Taiwan.” “We have a lot to talk about with President Xi, and he has a lot to talk about with us. I think we’ll have a good meeting,” Trump said. Taiwan has long been a contentious issue between the US and China.

UKRAINE, NVIDIA: The US leader said the subject of Russia’s war had come up ‘very strongly,’ while Jenson Huang was hoping that the conversation was good Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) and US President Donald Trump had differing takes following their meeting in Busan, South Korea, yesterday. Xi said that the two sides should complete follow-up work as soon as possible to deliver tangible results that would provide “peace of mind” to China, the US and the rest of the world, while Trump hailed the “great success” of the talks. The two discussed trade, including a deal to reduce tariffs slapped on China for its role in the fentanyl trade, as well as cooperation in ending the war in Ukraine, among other issues, but they did not mention