Are you on the Internet or the internet?
This debate has been raging for years, but the tide appeared to turn when major US news organizations decided to drop the capitalization of Internet, making it internet.
AP made the lower-case spelling effective June 1, a move quickly followed by The New York Times and Wall Street Journal. In Britain and other locations, media outlets made similar changes over the past few years.
Photo: REUTERS
“We now spell it lowercase, reflecting a growing trend and a change by our official dictionary, Webster’s New World College,” AP said in a statement. “We have also made web lowercase in all instances, and Web page and Web feed one word.”
AFP’s style guide calls for Internet capitalized in English, but lower case in French.
But the shift by US media groups could have an impact on usage.
Joseph Turow, a University of Pennsylvania communications professor who has been pressing for lower-case usage for over a decade, welcomed the change.
“This is part of everyday life and lower-case usage reinforces that idea,” Turow told AFP. “Most people see [the Internet] as a faucet that they turn on to get data.”
English teacher and blogger Mason West wrote that “there was really never a reason to capitalize Internet in the first place, and the writing and editorial world is breathing a collective sigh of relief.”
But the move also stirred passions among those who still view the Internet as a proper noun.
Vint Cerf, often described as the “father of the Internet” for inventing the protocols used online, said the change was a mistake, and that the AP editors “fail to understand history and technology.”
Cerf said in a statement to Politico that there is a difference between the “public” Internet, which he said should be capitalized, and “private internets.”
The latter, he said, use the same protocols “but do NOT connect to the public Internet. By lowercasing you create confusion between the two and that’s a mistake.”
The Internet Society, a nonprofit group created by Cerf and Bob Kahn with a mission to help connect people around the world, also said it was keeping its capital “I.”
“The Internet refers to the globally connected network of networks that enables billions of people and devices around the world to communicate and collaborate,” society spokeswoman Allesandra de Santillana said in an e-mail to AFP.
“Many other networks of networks — internets — use the same technologies but do not connect to the Internet. If we were each using those, we wouldn’t be able to e-mail each other.”
‘THERE IS JUST ONE’
Doc Searls, a journalist and author who has served as a fellow at the Berkman Center for Internet & Society at Harvard University, also defended the capitalization.
“The Internet is like the Universe,” Searls said in a blog post. “There is just one of it. There are no other examples. Formalizing the lower-case ‘internet,’ for whatever reason, dismisses what’s transcendent and singular about the Internet we have: a whole that is more, and other, than a sum of parts.”
Two years earlier, technology analyst Bill Thompson lamented in his BBC column that “those who choose ‘internet’ over ‘Internet’ are as wrong as those who would visit london, meet the queen or go for a boat trip down the river thames.”
The Oxford English Dictionary has kept Internet capitalized while recognizing this has been “passionately debated.”
Oxford’s Katherine Connor Martin said in a blog post that the capitalized form “is slightly more common” at around 54 percent worldwide, even though lower-case internet is more widely used in Britain.
“We are now in the midst of stylistic change with respect to the capitalization of Internet, but the process is proceeding in patchwork fashion and is far from complete,” Martin wrote.
“At Oxford, we will be watching our tracking corpus closely in the coming months, to see if lowercase internet makes new headway against the capitalized form.”
May 6 to May 12 Those who follow the Chinese-language news may have noticed the usage of the term zhuge (豬哥, literally ‘pig brother,’ a male pig raised for breeding purposes) in reports concerning the ongoing #Metoo scandal in the entertainment industry. The term’s modern connotations can range from womanizer or lecher to sexual predator, but it once referred to an important rural trade. Until the 1970s, it was a common sight to see a breeder herding a single “zhuge” down a rustic path with a bamboo whip, often traveling large distances over rugged terrain to service local families. Not only
Ahead of incoming president William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration on May 20 there appear to be signs that he is signaling to the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and that the Chinese side is also signaling to the Taiwan side. This raises a lot of questions, including what is the CCP up to, who are they signaling to, what are they signaling, how with the various actors in Taiwan respond and where this could ultimately go. In the last column, published on May 2, we examined the curious case of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) heavyweight Tseng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) — currently vice premier
The last time Mrs Hsieh came to Cihu Park in Taoyuan was almost 50 years ago, on a school trip to the grave of Taiwan’s recently deceased dictator. Busloads of children were brought in to pay their respects to Chiang Kai-shek (蔣中正), known as Generalissimo, who had died at 87, after decades ruling Taiwan under brutal martial law. “There were a lot of buses, and there was a long queue,” Hsieh recalled. “It was a school rule. We had to bow, and then we went home.” Chiang’s body is still there, under guard in a mausoleum at the end of a path
Last week the Directorate-General of Budget, Accounting and Statistics (DGBAS) released a set of very strange numbers on Taiwan’s wealth distribution. Duly quoted in the Taipei Times, the report said that “The Gini coefficient for Taiwanese households… was 0.606 at the end of 2021, lower than Australia’s 0.611, the UK’s 0.620, Japan’s 0.678, France’s 0.676 and Germany’s 0.727, the agency said in a report.” The Gini coefficient is a measure of relative inequality, usually of wealth or income, though it can be used to evaluate other forms of inequality. However, for most nations it is a number from .25 to .50