Taiwan in Time: Nov. 2 to Nov. 8
Upon the mention of Shakespeare during an interview in 1987, an 84-year-old Liang Shih-chiu (梁實秋) exclaimed, “Shakespeare again! I’ve already declared that I’ve severed all relations with him.”
But the Chinese-born writer and longtime National Taiwan Normal University (國立師範大學) English professor seemed eager to discuss what he called the “most important task in his life” — translating into Chinese the entire works of the legendary playwright and poet.
Courtesy of Wikipedia Commons
Liang died on Nov. 3 in Taipei, just a few months after that interview.
When the project was conceived in 1930, Liang was a young scholar who had recently returned to China after studying literature at Harvard and Columbia universities. It was 1967 when he singlehandedly completed the momentous task, and by that time he was a retired professor living in Taiwan.
The finished product contained 40 volumes (37 plays and three poem collections) and more than four million words. During the celebratory feast, Liang listed three key traits a person would need to accomplish what he did.
Photo: Wang Min-wei, Taipei Times
“Firstly, he can’t be too academically inclined, because if so, he would be doing research instead. Secondly, he can’t be a genius, because if so, he would be creating his own works instead. Thirdly, he must be long-living. I’m lucky that I possess all three traits,” he is reported to have said.
It wasn’t supposed to take this long. Philosopher and writer Hu Shih (胡適), then on the translation committee of the China Foundation for the Promotion of Education Culture (中華文化教育基金會), had planned for it to be a group project between five scholars, to be completed in five years.
Liang wrote that the other four dropped out for various reasons, and he carried on alone. However, war soon broke out in China with the Japanese invasion and later the Chinese Civil War. The majority of the translation was done in Taiwan, to where Liang had retreated with the Chinese Nationalist Party in 1949.
Photo: Hu Ching-hui, Taipei Times
Liang already had a few English-language book translations — Peter Pan and Silas Marner — under his belt when Hu recruited him.
Born in Beijing in 1903, Liang attended Tsinghua School (清華學校), which back then was a western-style prep school for students to study abroad in the US. In 1923, the entire class headed to the US, where Liang would spend time at Colorado College, Harvard and Columbia University. However, he was just as passionate about Chinese literature as he was Western.
He was very particular about his translation work, stating that his primary concern was to stay true to the original meaning of the text instead of translating directly. The main difference is that Liang’s translation is meant to be read, while Shakespeare’s works are meant to be acted out on a stage.
“Although I can’t translate word for word, at least I tried to do it sentence by sentence,” he said. “I will absolutely not delete anything, unlike some people today. I even tried to keep Shakespeare’s punctuation.”
It’s often mentioned how Liang also kept all obscene language or sexual references, which was not commonplace in those times.
“Sex is something that everyone is interested in, even in Chinese theater,” he said.
He also mentions the difficulty of translating puns.
“It’s just wordplay and doesn’t have much actual significance,” he says. “But the audience at that time enjoyed the puns. Occasionally, they can be translated into Chinese, but most of the time I can only explain them in the footnotes.”
Hu promised to personally throw a huge banquet for Liang, but he never got the chance because Wu died five years before the books were completed. After Liang finished translating all of Shakespeare’s plays, a banquet was held in Taipei on Aug. 6, 1967 with more than 300 people attending. But he wasn’t satisfied yet, and spent another year translating the playwright’s poetry.
Liang’s love affair with British literature didn’t stop there. In 1972, he embarked on another gargantuan project that kept him busy for the next seven years: History of British Literature (英國文學史) and Anthology of British Literature (英國文學選). Both works contain over one million words.
Taiwan in Time, a column about Taiwan’s history that is published every Sunday, spotlights important or interesting events around the nation that have anniversaries this week.
The problem with Marx’s famous remark that history repeats itself, first as tragedy, the second time as farce, is that the first time is usually farce as well. This week Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chair Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) made a pilgrimage to the People’s Republic of China (PRC) “to confer, converse and otherwise hob-nob” with Chinese Communist Party (CCP) officials. The visit was an instant international media hit, with major media reporting almost entirely shorn of context. “Taiwan’s main opposition leader landed in China Tuesday for a rare visit aimed at cross-strait ‘peace’”, crowed Agence-France Presse (AFP) from Shanghai. Rare!
What is the importance within the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) of the meeting between Xi Jinping (習近平), the leader Chinese Communist Party (CCP), and Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), the leader of the KMT? Local media is an excellent guide to determine how important — or unimportant — a news event is to the public. Taiwan has a vast online media ecosystem, and if a news item is gaining traction among readers, editors shift resources in near real time to boost coverage to meet the demand and drive up traffic. Cheng’s China trip is among the top headlines, but by no means
A recent report from the Environmental Management Administration of the Ministry of Environment highlights a perennial problem: illegal dumping of construction waste. In Taoyuan’s Yangmei District (楊梅) and Hsinchu’s Longtan District (龍潭) criminals leased 10,000 square meters of farmland, saying they were going to engage in horticulture. They then accepted between 40,000 and 50,000 cubic meters of construction waste from sites in northern Taiwan, charging less than the going rate for disposal, and dumped the waste concrete, tile, metal and glass onto the leased land. Taoyuan District prosecutors charged 33 individuals from seven companies with numerous violations of the law. This
Sunflower movement superstar Lin Fei-fan (林飛帆) once quipped that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) could nominate a watermelon to run for Tainan mayor and win. Conversely, the DPP could run a living saint for mayor in Taipei and still lose. In 2022, the DPP ran with the closest thing to a living saint they could find: former Minister of Health and Welfare Chen Shih-chung (陳時中). During the pandemic, his polling was astronomically high, with the approval of his performance reaching as high as 91 percent in one TVBS poll. He was such a phenomenon that people printed out pop-up cartoon