In 2010, a group of Puyuma Aboriginal musicians from Taitung’s Nanwang Tribe (南王部落) performed On the Road (很久沒有敬我了你) at Taipei’s National Concert Hall (國家音樂廳). Unusual for a musical performed at Taiwan’s top venue for classical music, it blended tribal sounds and dance with contemporary music and a Western orchestra.
But the ambitious project, a collaboration among record label Taiwan Colors Music (TCM, 角頭音樂), the National Symphony Orchestra (NSO, 國家交響樂團) and National Theater & Concert Hall (NTCH, 國家兩廳院), didn’t end when the curtain dropped. Kara-Orchestra (很久沒有敬我了妳), a cinematic complement to the musical, opens in theaters nationwide today.
Directed by Wu Mi-sen (吳米森) and produced by TCM President Zhang 43 (張四 十 三), the film examines topics — why and how Aboriginal music is altered or made palatable for a more sophisticated audience, what it means to be Taiwanese — that its theatrical counterpart only hinted at.
Photo courtesy of Activator Marketing Company
Incidentally, The Making of On The Road (很久), a 2011 documentary by Amis director Lungnan Isak Fangas, raised many of the issues addressed in Kara-Orchestra. That film featured interviews with artists and musicians who participated in the musical, including Hu, Hao-en, Pau-dull (陳建年) and music producer Cheng Chieh-jen (鄭捷任), and takes a deeper look into the question concerning indigenous music and its admission to the Han-Chinese centric system.
CONVENTIONAL STRUCTURE
Those familiar with Wu’s poetic and cinematic vocabulary, so eloquently shown in Fluffy Rhapsody (起毛球了, 2000) and Amour-Legende (松鼠自殺事件, 2006), will be surprised at the conventional three-act structure of this new offering. A young female musician, Feng Huo-yun (Youki, 侑紀), is appointed by NTCH director Chang San-lang (Tsai Chen-nan, 蔡振南) as the NSO’s new conductor. Conflicts erupt between Feng and principal violinist Tung jen-to (Leon Dai, 戴立忍) because Tung doubts the young conductor’s ability to lead the orchestra.
Photo courtesy of Activator Marketing Company
THE PRANK
During a rehearsal, an Aboriginal woman appears in the audience. She sings for a brief moment, and then disappears. It later turns out to be a joke by Tung and his friends, played by the legendary Kimbo Hu (胡德夫), Samingad (紀曉君) and Yangui Yasiungu (安歆澐), meant to show that Aboriginal music is as good as any show.
Tung’s mischievous prank, however, inspires Chang. Feng and Dai are then sent to the Aboriginal village to collaborate on a work. The two meet villagers and musicians such as Hao-en (昊恩) and the Nanwang Sisters (南王姐妹花). Feeling excluded at first, Feng gradually earns her place and reconciles with Tung.
Photo courtesy of Activator Marketing Company
Back in Taipei, Chang loses his job to a wealthy Chinese businessman, amusingly played by exiled Chinese dissident Wang Dan (王丹). It’s promptly replaced with a Chinese music production.
The makeshift group of musicians, however, are determined to retake the stage.
SOCIAL ISSUES
Photo courtesy of Activator Marketing Company
While promising, the film lacks structure and dramatic nuance. The initial antagonism and later reconciliation between the two leads are less narratively cogent. Japanese-Taiwanese actress Youki might be good for a role that metaphorically reflects Taiwan’s past and present, but there is little intensity in her portrayal of an over-achieving young woman searching for her roots.
The film succeeds when it adopts humor to tackle serious issues. The question of whether tribal music and dance should be performed in a national theater is playfully touched on in a sequence where tribal villagers, who have no understanding of musical notation, happily use a karaoke machine to practice.
The presence of many indigenous musicians showing off their singing prowess is one of the movie’s many pleasures. Cameo appearances by public figures such as architect Roan Ching-yueh (阮慶岳), writer and former Taipei mayoral candidate Neil Peng (馮光遠) and Lin Wen-yi (林文義), a well-known novelist and social critic, suggest that the film’s non-Aboriginal characters are on their own kind of inner journey while discovering the nation’s indigenous heritage.
Photo courtesy of Activator Marketing Company
Photo courtesy of Activator Marketing Company
Photo courtesy of Activator Marketing Company
Photo courtesy of Activator Marketing Company
June 23 to June 29 After capturing the walled city of Hsinchu on June 22, 1895, the Japanese hoped to quickly push south and seize control of Taiwan’s entire west coast — but their advance was stalled for more than a month. Not only did local Hakka fighters continue to cause them headaches, resistance forces even attempted to retake the city three times. “We had planned to occupy Anping (Tainan) and Takao (Kaohsiung) as soon as possible, but ever since we took Hsinchu, nearby bandits proclaiming to be ‘righteous people’ (義民) have been destroying train tracks and electrical cables, and gathering in villages
This year will go down in the history books. Taiwan faces enormous turmoil and uncertainty in the coming months. Which political parties are in a good position to handle big changes? All of the main parties are beset with challenges. Taking stock, this column examined the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) (“Huang Kuo-chang’s choking the life out of the TPP,” May 28, page 12), the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) (“Challenges amid choppy waters for the DPP,” June 14, page 12) and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) (“KMT struggles to seize opportunities as ‘interesting times’ loom,” June 20, page 11). Times like these can
Dr. Y. Tony Yang, Associate Dean of Health Policy and Population Science at George Washington University, argued last week in a piece for the Taipei Times about former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) leading a student delegation to the People’s Republic of China (PRC) that, “The real question is not whether Ma’s visit helps or hurts Taiwan — it is why Taiwan lacks a sophisticated, multi-track approach to one of the most complex geopolitical relationships in the world” (“Ma’s Visit, DPP’s Blind Spot,” June 18, page 8). Yang contends that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has a blind spot: “By treating any
Swooping low over the banks of a Nile River tributary, an aid flight run by retired American military officers released a stream of food-stuffed sacks over a town emptied by fighting in South Sudan, a country wracked by conflict. Last week’s air drop was the latest in a controversial development — private contracting firms led by former US intelligence officers and military veterans delivering aid to some of the world’s deadliest conflict zones, in operations organized with governments that are combatants in the conflicts. The moves are roiling the global aid community, which warns of a more militarized, politicized and profit-seeking trend
RSS