Why doesn’t Taiwan have any World Heritage Sites? The answer is fairly clear. The list, currently comprising 878 sites in 145 countries, is compiled by UNESCO, part of the United Nations. And Taiwan, despite all its best efforts, still isn’t a member of the UN.
Even so, China — whose pressure is the main, indeed the only, reason Taiwan isn’t a UN member — hasn’t managed to include any Taiwan sites in its own listings, at least not yet. It has 37 sites of its own in this sumptuous official guide to all the current sites worldwide. The site nearest to Taiwan that the book contains is on the Ryukyu Islands — the “Gusuku Sites and Related Properties” — listed under Japan’s 14 entries.
China routinely gives weather forecasts for Taipei on its domestic TV services, and it would come as no surprise for it one day to succeed in including some Taiwan sites in its UNESCO listings. The procedure for inclusion is that UN member-states submit proposals and these are then vetted by UNESCO committees. But to date no Taiwan sites appear, under any national heading.
This is a huge pity. The criteria for inclusion are deliberately set very wide, with 10 categories. Essentially, though, there are two groupings — cultural or historic significance, and outstanding natural beauty. Taiwan could well get several such places accepted for inclusion.
The Nantou mountain area centering on Yushan (玉山) would easily qualify (China got its own Mount Sanqingshan National Park in Jiangxi Province included as recently as last year). So too would our many historic Aboriginal sites — one of UNESCO’s criteria is places that are “an outstanding example of a traditional human settlement, land-use, or sea-use which is representative of a culture (or cultures), or human interaction with the environment when it has become vulnerable under the impact of irreversible change.”
That having been said, The World’s Heritage remains a wonderful publication, either to read through, browse, or keep for reference. It lists its contents in order of acceptance by UNESCO, and the first was the Galapagos Islands (“a tossed salad of marine species”) in 1978. But the essential motive for such a collection came earlier, in the 1950s, when Egypt’s construction of the Aswan High Dam necessitated the moving of the unique and vast Abu Simbel temple complex, otherwise doomed to be drowned. This was successfully achieved after a worldwide fund-raising scheme, and the concept of numerous other sites all over the globe that needed to be preserved, if rarely so dramatically, was brought to the front of people’s minds.
Today Italy leads the list, with 43 sites. Spain has 40, France 33, Mexico 30, Japan 14, Indonesia seven, Malaysia (surely under-represented) three, and so on. The US has 20, and the UK 27.
Major absences, apart from Taiwan, are hard to catalogue. The English Lake District, though in little need of promotion, and hardly threatened, seems a strange omission. So does anything from Bali. Maybe the Indonesians are considering putting the entire island up for eventual admission.
But there’s no question of this book, comprehensive though it is, being a definitive or in any way a final listing. “Many sites of outstanding universal value have yet to be included in the List,” writes Koichiro Matsuura, Director-General of UNESCO, in his Forward.
RSS