The Ministry of Education last month proposed a nationwide ban on mobile devices in schools, aiming to curb concerns over student phone addiction.
Under the revised regulation, which will take effect in August, teachers and schools will be required to collect mobile devices — including phones, laptops and wearables devices — for safekeeping during school hours, unless they are being used for educational purposes.
Photo: Bonnie White
For Chang Fong-ching (張鳳琴), the ban will have a positive impact.
“It’s a good move,” says the professor in the department of health promotion and education at National Taiwan Normal University.
Chang’s research shows that phone-free schools report lower rates of smartphone and gaming addiction, as well as decreased exposure to online sexual harassment — 3.5 percent versus 7.7 percent for schools without the restrictions.
Photo: Bonnie White
However, while the ban signals a move towards addressing these issues, skepticism remains. Civic organizations and student groups say the government is being short-sighted when it comes to the realities of classroom dynamics and youth needs.
“This ban is a simple answer to a complex problem. Education should be prioritized,” says Alice Yang (楊姿潁), director of Taiwan Youth Association for Democracy (臺灣青年民主協會).
PHONE ADDICTION
Photo: Bonnie White
Ko Huei-chen (柯慧貞) says the ban is a double-edged sword. Students will eventually adapt, but some “who rely on phones for stress relief or social connection may experience distress or resistance during the adjustment period,” says Ko, a professor of psychology at Asia University and founder of the country’s first youth digital detox camps.
Ko suggests that schools guide students towards positive and intentional use of mobile devices by engaging in open dialogue about their risks and benefits.
According to a Youth Mental Health Survey released in February, Taiwanese junior and senior high school students spend an average of 35 hours on social media every week with 37.7 percent showing signs of screen addiction.
While some students sacrifice sleep over scrolling, the ban only concerns those who are glued to the screens during class.
Richard Cheng (鄭詩樵), a Health Education teacher at Taipei Municipal Jinhua Junior High School, says that he and his colleagues experience conflict with students who secretly use their phones.
“When a teacher wants to stop this behavior, [students] will get angry,” he says.
For Yang, the ban raises concerns over student rights. A student reported to her that a teacher confiscated her phone and kept it for a semester without justification.
Chang says that removing phones from the grip of students pushes their habits into the shadows, where late-night scrolling often replaces sleep as their only escape from adult control.
ADULT RESPONSIBILITY
Harold Li (李宏文), director of the Child Welfare League Foundation (兒福聯盟), says that Taiwanese children are on average more addicted to social media (20 percent) than the rest of the world (18 percent). He adds that adults should be responsible for setting the right example.
“[Adults] cannot just tell their children to not use their cell phones or the Internet while they sit on the sofa and keep scrolling,” he says.
For Li, the dialogue begins at home. He believes that parents should also be taught digital literacy — how to access, evaluate and use online content — to help bridge the divide between adults and children.
“Adults think that the carrot and the stick technique is the best way to teach a lesson but children only remember the stick,” he says.
Li says that the ban overlooks the limited communication and support between adults and children. Counselling resources in schools are stigmatised and insufficient, so students turn to the Internet for help instead.
Li adds that children understand the Internet better than adults, but these digital natives can easily be deceived and need guidance from parents and teachers to set healthy digital habits.
“If school bans incorporate elements such as emotional education, meaningful engagement and family-school collaboration, the policy is far more likely to succeed,” Ko says.
The small platform at Duoliang Train Station in Taitung County’s Taimali Township (太麻里) served villagers from 1992 to 2006, but was eventually shut down due to lack of use. Just 10 years later, the abandoned train station had become widely known as the most beautiful station in Taiwan, and visitors were so frequent that the village had to start restricting traffic. Nowadays, Duoliang Village (多良) is known as a bit of a tourist trap, with a mandatory, albeit modest, admission fee of NT$10 giving access to a crowded lane of vendors with a mediocre view of the ocean and the trains
For many people, Bilingual Nation 2030 begins and ends in the classroom. Since the policy was launched in 2018, the debate has centered on students, teachers and the pressure placed on schools. Yet the policy was never solely about English education. The government’s official plan also calls for bilingualization in Taiwan’s government services, laws and regulations, and living environment. The goal is to make Taiwan more inclusive and accessible to international enterprises and talent and better prepared for global economic and trade conditions. After eight years, that grand vision is due for a pulse check. RULES THAT CAN BE READ For Harper Chen (陳虹宇), an adviser
Traditionally, indigenous people in Taiwan’s mountains practice swidden cultivation, or “slash and burn” agriculture, a practice common in human history. According to a 2016 research article in the International Journal of Environmental Sustainability, among the Atayal people, this began with a search for suitable forested slopeland. The trees are burnt for fertilizer and the land cleared of stones. The stones and wood are then piled up to make fences, while both dead and standing trees are retained on the plot. The fences are used to grow climbing crops like squash and beans. The plot itself supports farming for three years.
President William Lai (賴清德) on Nov. 25 last year announced in a Washington Post op-ed that “my government will introduce a historic US$40 billion supplementary defense budget, an investment that underscores our commitment to defending Taiwan’s democracy.” Lai promised “significant new arms acquisitions from the United States” and to “invest in cutting-edge technologies and expand Taiwan’s defense industrial base,” to “bolster deterrence by inserting greater costs and uncertainties into Beijing’s decision-making on the use of force.” Announcing it in the Washington Post was a strategic gamble, both geopolitically and domestically, with Taiwan’s international credibility at stake. But Lai’s message was exactly
RSS