Julie & Julia boasts that it is based on two true stories: that of Julia Child, the diplomat’s wife turned chef whose book Mastering the Art of French Cooking revolutionized the American culinary scene, and Julie Powell, whose blog about working her way through that very same book was turned into a best-selling chick-lit novel.
In effect, packed into the two hours of the film are not just two true stories, but two books, three if you count Child’s My Life in France, from which much of her story is taken, and a blog. As most movies face problems adapting just one novel into film format, it is hardly a surprise that Julie & Julia is constantly in danger of falling apart from an excess of ingredients.
There is nevertheless much to admire, not least Meryl Streep’s performance as Julia Child, the large American woman who barrels her way through France with a trans-Atlantic gusto that shocks and delights the Continentals in equal measure. Streep creates a portrait of Child that possesses considerable depth, but her story, from her discovery of the delights of good French cooking to her efforts to study the cuisine seriously and eventually publish a book demystifying it for an American audience, is little more than a sketch.
The lack of detail is necessary, for the story must constantly cut forward to Amy Adams’ (as Julie Powell) struggle to find meaning in her life through blogging about Child’s book. This is more familiar Nora Ephron territory, and it shares similarities in tone with earlier works, though it lacks her customary witty dialogue. Because let’s face it, there simply isn’t time to get too wordy, and even Powell’s less-than-momentous but sometimes amusing meditations on a culinary relationship spanning half a century are neglected, as the camera cuts back again to Paris in the 1960s.
With all this to-ing and fro-ing, the food, which is central to both Child’s and Powell’s achievements, is pretty much neglected except for a couple of sight gags, the most memorable of which features a lobster. For a self-declared foodie, I found this a terrible disappointment, though others may not. But by the end of the film, those who were unaware of what exactly Child achieved will not be much the wiser. The woman who demands of her readers that “you should be able to make it [mayonnaise] by hand as part of your general mastery of the egg yoke” never really emerges, and the seriousness of Child’s endeavor gets smothered in chick-flick marshmallow.
At its heart, Julie & Julia is a film about publishing: the emotional payoffs are Child eventually finding a publisher for her revolutionary 700-page cookbook, and the realization of Powell’s dream to monetize her blog (something she has done with remarkable success; this film also boasts that it’s the first motion picture based on a blog).
There is also a distinct sense of unevenness about the movie. Amy Adams is no match for Streep, and Child’s memoirs of her life in France, even in the sparse form they are presented here, are significantly more interesting that Powell’s one-year blog project and minor relationship blunders. The loving attention paid to period detail, which makes the 1960s sections so lush, also gives the modern sequences a low-rent made-for-TV feel.
So while Julie & Julia is not a terrible film, there is nothing very satisfying about it either. Ephron tries to do too many things at once and, skilled director that she is, gets through the task, though with a palpable sense of effort. Clearly she intended the film to be a light souffle, but it has ended up a rather stodgy pudding.
Sept. 28 to Oct. 4 Opening in 1971, Singapore’s Wisma Theatre (海燕歌劇院) was entirely modeled after Taiwanese live variety shows, combining singing, dancing and drama. Even its performers were recruited from Taiwan. The formula was an instant hit, selling out on the third night with the crowd fighting outside for tickets. Among its key figures was 31-year-old Chi Li-nan (紀利男), an acclaimed saxophonist and band leader who had entered Taiwan’s live entertainment scene at age 19 with zero musical training. Chi wasn’t even supposed to be there. He had accompanied his girlfriend, pop singer Shang Kuan Ping (上官萍), to negotiations with Wisma’s agent.
The tussle between the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and its pro-People’s Republic of China (PRC) allies and fellow travelers, and the pro-Taiwan side in politics is in part a struggle over defining the nation’s agency in international spaces. What kind of agency does Taiwan have? The United Daily News (UDN) recently reported that former National Security Council secretary-general and longtime KMT stalwart Su Chi (蘇起), popularizer of the fake “1992 consensus,” contended that the US was both unable and unwilling to protect Taiwan. He also asserted that the threat from the PRC was rising and that the future depended on the
The Changhua County commissioner race is the most exciting and dramatic in this election cycle, with surprises within the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) popping up every week or two. Most recently, County Commissioner Wang Huei-mei (王惠美), who is about to term limit out, alleges that KMT Chair Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) pushed for unknown entity Wei Ping-cheng (魏平政) to be the party’s candidate for the position far earlier than was previously known. If true, Wang’s accusations raise a lot of questions about Cheng and the party leadership’s motives. Many local factions and power brokers in Changhua are in open revolt against
Serving as interpreter during Culture Minister Li Yuan’s (李遠) visit to Britain offered an unusual view of cultural diplomacy — not as ceremony, but as a series of conversations capable of becoming lasting relationships. During four intensive days, from Sept. 6 to Sept. 9, the delegation moved between museums, arts centers, universities and literary organizations. The program ranged from urban planning and museum access to translation, illustration and contemporary dance. Yet one question connected these encounters: How can an initial meeting become a relationship that lasts? Li described himself as “greedy” about the possibilities. The word was characteristically humorous, but the ambition