Julie & Julia boasts that it is based on two true stories: that of Julia Child, the diplomat’s wife turned chef whose book Mastering the Art of French Cooking revolutionized the American culinary scene, and Julie Powell, whose blog about working her way through that very same book was turned into a best-selling chick-lit novel.
In effect, packed into the two hours of the film are not just two true stories, but two books, three if you count Child’s My Life in France, from which much of her story is taken, and a blog. As most movies face problems adapting just one novel into film format, it is hardly a surprise that Julie & Julia is constantly in danger of falling apart from an excess of ingredients.
There is nevertheless much to admire, not least Meryl Streep’s performance as Julia Child, the large American woman who barrels her way through France with a trans-Atlantic gusto that shocks and delights the Continentals in equal measure. Streep creates a portrait of Child that possesses considerable depth, but her story, from her discovery of the delights of good French cooking to her efforts to study the cuisine seriously and eventually publish a book demystifying it for an American audience, is little more than a sketch.
The lack of detail is necessary, for the story must constantly cut forward to Amy Adams’ (as Julie Powell) struggle to find meaning in her life through blogging about Child’s book. This is more familiar Nora Ephron territory, and it shares similarities in tone with earlier works, though it lacks her customary witty dialogue. Because let’s face it, there simply isn’t time to get too wordy, and even Powell’s less-than-momentous but sometimes amusing meditations on a culinary relationship spanning half a century are neglected, as the camera cuts back again to Paris in the 1960s.
With all this to-ing and fro-ing, the food, which is central to both Child’s and Powell’s achievements, is pretty much neglected except for a couple of sight gags, the most memorable of which features a lobster. For a self-declared foodie, I found this a terrible disappointment, though others may not. But by the end of the film, those who were unaware of what exactly Child achieved will not be much the wiser. The woman who demands of her readers that “you should be able to make it [mayonnaise] by hand as part of your general mastery of the egg yoke” never really emerges, and the seriousness of Child’s endeavor gets smothered in chick-flick marshmallow.
At its heart, Julie & Julia is a film about publishing: the emotional payoffs are Child eventually finding a publisher for her revolutionary 700-page cookbook, and the realization of Powell’s dream to monetize her blog (something she has done with remarkable success; this film also boasts that it’s the first motion picture based on a blog).
There is also a distinct sense of unevenness about the movie. Amy Adams is no match for Streep, and Child’s memoirs of her life in France, even in the sparse form they are presented here, are significantly more interesting that Powell’s one-year blog project and minor relationship blunders. The loving attention paid to period detail, which makes the 1960s sections so lush, also gives the modern sequences a low-rent made-for-TV feel.
So while Julie & Julia is not a terrible film, there is nothing very satisfying about it either. Ephron tries to do too many things at once and, skilled director that she is, gets through the task, though with a palpable sense of effort. Clearly she intended the film to be a light souffle, but it has ended up a rather stodgy pudding.
This year will go down in the history books. Taiwan faces enormous turmoil and uncertainty in the coming months. Which political parties are in a good position to handle big changes? All of the main parties are beset with challenges. Taking stock, this column examined the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) (“Huang Kuo-chang’s choking the life out of the TPP,” May 28, page 12), the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) (“Challenges amid choppy waters for the DPP,” June 14, page 12) and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) (“KMT struggles to seize opportunities as ‘interesting times’ loom,” June 20, page 11). Times like these can
June 23 to June 29 After capturing the walled city of Hsinchu on June 22, 1895, the Japanese hoped to quickly push south and seize control of Taiwan’s entire west coast — but their advance was stalled for more than a month. Not only did local Hakka fighters continue to cause them headaches, resistance forces even attempted to retake the city three times. “We had planned to occupy Anping (Tainan) and Takao (Kaohsiung) as soon as possible, but ever since we took Hsinchu, nearby bandits proclaiming to be ‘righteous people’ (義民) have been destroying train tracks and electrical cables, and gathering in villages
Dr. Y. Tony Yang, Associate Dean of Health Policy and Population Science at George Washington University, argued last week in a piece for the Taipei Times about former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) leading a student delegation to the People’s Republic of China (PRC) that, “The real question is not whether Ma’s visit helps or hurts Taiwan — it is why Taiwan lacks a sophisticated, multi-track approach to one of the most complex geopolitical relationships in the world” (“Ma’s Visit, DPP’s Blind Spot,” June 18, page 8). Yang contends that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has a blind spot: “By treating any
Swooping low over the banks of a Nile River tributary, an aid flight run by retired American military officers released a stream of food-stuffed sacks over a town emptied by fighting in South Sudan, a country wracked by conflict. Last week’s air drop was the latest in a controversial development — private contracting firms led by former US intelligence officers and military veterans delivering aid to some of the world’s deadliest conflict zones, in operations organized with governments that are combatants in the conflicts. The moves are roiling the global aid community, which warns of a more militarized, politicized and profit-seeking trend
RSS