Two square canvases by Japanese artist Takashi Murakami flash Louis Vuitton logos, cutesy pink and yellow graphics and the price of US$350,000.
Ubiquitous in the auction salesroom, Murakami’s work now greets the visitors at Rental, a Lower East Side gallery overlooking the Manhattan Bridge and US$20 buses to Philadelphia and Washington.
The downscale venue, known for showing emerging art, has installed 20 upscale works by fashionable and commercially tested names for its summer group exhibition. Don’t Panic! I’m Selling My Collection assembles pieces from four anonymous private collections, with price tags prominent.
“It’s a sign of the times,” said owner Joel Mesler, 35. “There’s been a huge paradigm shift in the art market. People who know how to adapt and are not rigidly operating the same way they have been for the past five years are going to prevail.”
Don’t Panic! is an attempt to attract new clients during the lean times, said Mesler, a mellow and soft-spoken West Coast transplant. He closed his Los Angeles-based Mesler & Hug gallery last month to focus on Rental, where he often partners with
like-minded out-of-town galleries.
“On Sept. 15 our phone stopped ringing,” said director Philip Deely, 25, remembering the day when Lehman Brothers declared bankruptcy last year. “It lasted into early spring. But people are not panicking any more. There’s renewed hope that wasn’t there six months ago.”
Don’t Panic! encapsulates many sectors of the art bubble: Blue-chip artists such as Andy Warhol and Roy Lichtenstein; speculators’ darlings Richard Prince and Murakami; young overnight sensations Barnaby Furnas and Hope Atherton; veterans John Wesley and Marilyn Minter; Chinese artists Huang Yan (黃岩) and Zhang Dali (張大力).
While there are no masterpieces here, several works are appealing and priced to sell. A striking black-and-white image of a bound woman by Japan’s Nobuyoshi Araki would set you back US$13,000. David Salle’s sensual etching with an Asian motif is US$1,500.
At US$350,000, Murakami’s 2005 diptych Eye Love Superflat seems overpriced. An identical work, with an estimate range of US$350,000 to US$450,000, failed to sell in November last year at Sotheby’s in New York, according to Artnet.com, a database that tracks auction results.
The show’s curator, Claire Distenfeld, who is 23 and the gallery’s latest hire, put it together in three weeks by drawing on her art-world connections.
A native New Yorker whose family lives at a pricey East 79th Street and Madison Avenue address, Distenfeld graduated from New York University, interned at the New Museum of Art and is getting a master’s degree at Sotheby’s Institute of Art. Her father owns a luxury-leather-goods company in Manhattan.
Her uncle is real-estate developer Richard Born, a collector of contemporary Chinese art whose BD Hotels owns or operates Manhattan boutique hotels such as the Mercer, Chambers and Maritime and is behind the Richard Meier towers in Greenwich Village.
“I knew where to go, and I hit the ground running,” Distenfeld said.
She drew up a list of 15 collectors and succeeded in convincing four of them to consign works to the young gallery. The most expensive artwork Rental has sold up to now was a US$35,000 painting by Henry Taylor, Mesler said.
“Claire went to individual collectors and said, ‘Don’t you want to sell something?’” said Cynthia Nachmani, Distenfeld’s mentor who teaches art and gives gallery tours in New York. “She is recycling art at the time when people need to sell.”
You can pick up a small “joke” painting by Prince for US$110,000, a Warhol silkscreen of martini glasses for US$165,000 and an oval canvas by Elizabeth Peyton for US$50,000.
One of the show’s highlights, a painting by George Condo, was too big to fit in the elevator or make it up the narrow stairway lined with Chinese signs, a bridal-gown shop and a dental office. It’s still for sale at US$85,000.
At the opening, some potential clients — middle-age men in suits and women flashing big diamonds — sipped white wine next to hipsters whose blue eyebrows matched their clothes. A security guard, the gallery’s first, looked on sternly.
The older guests were Distenfeld’s friends and family members, many of whom have never been in the neighborhood before.
“This is the first for most of us,” said Nachmani. “When I lecture to my groups, we go to Chelsea or 57th Street. I’ve never taken them to galleries in this part of town. And now I would.”
April 28 to May 4 During the Japanese colonial era, a city’s “first” high school typically served Japanese students, while Taiwanese attended the “second” high school. Only in Taichung was this reversed. That’s because when Taichung First High School opened its doors on May 1, 1915 to serve Taiwanese students who were previously barred from secondary education, it was the only high school in town. Former principal Hideo Azukisawa threatened to quit when the government in 1922 attempted to transfer the “first” designation to a new local high school for Japanese students, leading to this unusual situation. Prior to the Taichung First
The Ministry of Education last month proposed a nationwide ban on mobile devices in schools, aiming to curb concerns over student phone addiction. Under the revised regulation, which will take effect in August, teachers and schools will be required to collect mobile devices — including phones, laptops and wearables devices — for safekeeping during school hours, unless they are being used for educational purposes. For Chang Fong-ching (張鳳琴), the ban will have a positive impact. “It’s a good move,” says the professor in the department of
On April 17, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) launched a bold campaign to revive and revitalize the KMT base by calling for an impromptu rally at the Taipei prosecutor’s offices to protest recent arrests of KMT recall campaigners over allegations of forgery and fraud involving signatures of dead voters. The protest had no time to apply for permits and was illegal, but that played into the sense of opposition grievance at alleged weaponization of the judiciary by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) to “annihilate” the opposition parties. Blamed for faltering recall campaigns and faced with a KMT chair
Article 2 of the Additional Articles of the Constitution of the Republic of China (中華民國憲法增修條文) stipulates that upon a vote of no confidence in the premier, the president can dissolve the legislature within 10 days. If the legislature is dissolved, a new legislative election must be held within 60 days, and the legislators’ terms will then be reckoned from that election. Two weeks ago Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) proposed that the legislature hold a vote of no confidence in the premier and dare the president to dissolve the legislature. The legislature is currently controlled