“For the executions, on the one hand, the victim was attached to a chair-like construction, whereas on the other hand a young tree was chosen for its elasticity. This tree was bent with force and attached to the head of the person to be executed, the head being placed in a net-like rope contraption. The executor with one well-adjusted blow severed the head from the trunk. This head, under the force of the suddenly released tree, was thus projected far away.”
The above account, written by Leon Hanolet in 1897 for the magazine La Belgique Coloniale, appears alongside a large black-and-white photograph showing the execution it describes. The image is one of many displayed along with 500 iron weapons in Fatal Beauty: Traditional Weapons From Central Africa, an outstanding exhibit currently running at the National Museum of History.
A display of Central African weapons of this size and scope has never been shown before in Taiwan and the museum has clearly done its homework. The weapons (acquired from European museums and private collections), large photos, illustrations and maps are all clearly marked in Chinese and English and concisely arranged.
Working in collaboration with guest curator Jan Elsen and Marc Leo Felix, an expert on Central African ritual and art, the museum divides most of the exhibit into “18 armament groups.” The exhibit’s principal theme is to present the diversity of the region’s swords, spears, daggers, sickles and throwing knives as a means of illustrating the importance that these weapons occupied in the tribal societies where they were used.
This theme is underlined by additional sections on iron smelting, weapons as a form of currency and the role of blacksmiths in tribal society, which provides context and depth and reveals that iron weapons bore as much a monetary and ritualistic importance in Central African society as they did one that was functional. A section on firearms demonstrates the adverse influence colonialism exerted on these peoples — a subtheme of the exhibit.
A map of Africa accompanies the introduction for each group, with tribal borders highlighted in yellow. The museum lists the names of each tribal group (there are a total of 268 for all 18 groups) in high-block lettering beside which are a few paragraphs describing the region’s geographical characteristics and the weapons used.
For example, Group 1, which consists of the Fang, Kota, Bumali, Bakwele, Djem, Ndzabi, Ndassa, Wumbu, Mbaamba, Ndumu and Mbede peoples, covers an area that spans what is today’s Cameroon, Equatorial Guinea, Gabon and the Republic of the Congo. The introduction to this section states that the main weapons used by this group included bird-headed axes (as utensils and for rituals), crossbows (hunting) and barbed javelins (warfare). The weapons, dating from the 19th century, are clearly displayed below the short blurbs.
The illustrated maps introducing each section are of particular interest because they highlight the artificially imposed borders that make up today’s Africa. For example, the border separating Cameroon and the Central African Republic cuts straight through the traditional lands of the Gbaya peoples in Group 2.
The section on iron weapons as a form of currency illustrates how rules imposed by Europeans disrupted tribal society. The curators cite as an example the policies of King Leopold II of Belgium who signed a decree in 1887 setting up a common currency in the Belgian Congo similar to that found in Europe. This policy upset the traditional bartering system where prearranged rules of exchange determined the value of an object. As Jacques A. Schoonheyt writes in the exhibition catalogue, “… it was a lengthy and brutal process. The scale of values which pertained at the time was profoundly upset … [and] led to a breakdown of a whole series of traditions which had evolved over the years.”
The mbili ngbiaka spear point of the Ngbaka ethnic group (given as part of the marriage dowry) and the ngindza throwing knife of the Mbugbu people (used for barter) are two examples of these functionally useless but valuable objects cited by Schoonheyt to illustrate the complex relationship between iron weapons and economic transactions.
The introduction of firearms into the region reduced the need for iron weapons and the art of blacksmithing went into steep decline. This section serves as somewhat of a depressing coda to the exhibit and one walks away from it with the feeling that the demise of the rich tradition of weapon production serves as a metaphor for the destruction of the traditions of the region’s people.
One small gripe is that the museum uses a smoky-glass as a surface on which to project accompanying films, making the already grainy images almost impossible to see. But this is a small drawback in an exhibit that reveals the important role iron weapons played in Central Africa’s tribal culture.
April 28 to May 4 During the Japanese colonial era, a city’s “first” high school typically served Japanese students, while Taiwanese attended the “second” high school. Only in Taichung was this reversed. That’s because when Taichung First High School opened its doors on May 1, 1915 to serve Taiwanese students who were previously barred from secondary education, it was the only high school in town. Former principal Hideo Azukisawa threatened to quit when the government in 1922 attempted to transfer the “first” designation to a new local high school for Japanese students, leading to this unusual situation. Prior to the Taichung First
The Ministry of Education last month proposed a nationwide ban on mobile devices in schools, aiming to curb concerns over student phone addiction. Under the revised regulation, which will take effect in August, teachers and schools will be required to collect mobile devices — including phones, laptops and wearables devices — for safekeeping during school hours, unless they are being used for educational purposes. For Chang Fong-ching (張鳳琴), the ban will have a positive impact. “It’s a good move,” says the professor in the department of
On April 17, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) launched a bold campaign to revive and revitalize the KMT base by calling for an impromptu rally at the Taipei prosecutor’s offices to protest recent arrests of KMT recall campaigners over allegations of forgery and fraud involving signatures of dead voters. The protest had no time to apply for permits and was illegal, but that played into the sense of opposition grievance at alleged weaponization of the judiciary by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) to “annihilate” the opposition parties. Blamed for faltering recall campaigns and faced with a KMT chair
Article 2 of the Additional Articles of the Constitution of the Republic of China (中華民國憲法增修條文) stipulates that upon a vote of no confidence in the premier, the president can dissolve the legislature within 10 days. If the legislature is dissolved, a new legislative election must be held within 60 days, and the legislators’ terms will then be reckoned from that election. Two weeks ago Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) proposed that the legislature hold a vote of no confidence in the premier and dare the president to dissolve the legislature. The legislature is currently controlled
RSS