Krishnammal Jagannathan, 82, and her husband, Sankaralingam, 95, have spent a lifetime fighting for the rights of the deprived, especially the dalits, the former “untouchables,” who form the lowest rung of India’s ancient caste ladder.
The couple — named Wednesday among the recipients of the 2008 Right Livelihood Awards, often called the Alternative Nobel Prizes — have ensured over decades that thousands of hectares of land were distributed to landless dalit laborers in India’s southern state of Tamil Nadu.
The Jagannathans and their organization, Land for the Tillers’ Freedom, were cited by the awards jury for “realizing in practice the Gandhian vision of social justice and sustainable human development.”
Krishnammal Jagannathan comes from a landless dalit family and managed to get a university education in spite of her family’s poverty.
“I took a vow in my childhood that I must liberate dalits, specially women, from the clutches of the landowner,” she said while remembering the troubles of her mother, left a widow at 32 with 12 children.
“Six of them died, but she made every effort to see that the rest of us were brought up with some dignity, and she was poor and not educated,” Krishnammal Jagannathan said.
Despite India’s affirmative action policy, the dalits are still among the country’s poorest, and a majority of them remain landless laborers and manual scavengers.
Krishnammal Jagannathan said she would use the award money to build “beautiful houses” for the dalit women who work hard in paddy fields by day and then return to do housework and often are beaten by drunken husbands at night.
“I have succeeded in getting land for 13,000 women,” said the prize winner, who with her husband is to share the US$300,000 prize with the three other award recipients. “Now I want for them beautiful homes. The award money will help.”
“The award is a gift for my hard work over a long period,” she added.
And a very long period indeed, spanning more than 60 years.
Krishnammal Jagannathan met her husband when she joined Gandhi’s social reform movement in the 1920s. Sankaralingam Jagannathan was born into a wealthy family but left his studies in college to join India’s freedom movement led by Gandhi, of which the social reform element was an intrinsic part.
Gandhi’s philosophy of sarvodaya — which encompasses dignity of labor, an equitable distribution of wealth, communal self-sufficiency and individual freedom — inspired the couple to take up the cause of the rural poor, especially the landless dalits.
After India gained independence from British rule, the couple joined another Gandhian leader, Vinoba Bhave, in his bhoodan (gift land) movement where the activists walked the roads trying to persuade landlords to give one-sixth of their land to the landless.
The Jagannathans started their work on land reform in Tamil Nadu’s Thanjavur district in 1968 after the Kilvelmani massacre, in which 42 dalits, mostly women and children, were burned alive in a remote village in the district by a landlord’s hired goons over a wage dispute.
Land for the Tillers’ Freedom was an outcome of the Jagannathans’ decades-long struggle for the landless. It was founded in 1981 with the aim of bringing the landless and the landlord to the negotiating table and to obtain government and bank concessions for loans so the landless could buy land at reasonable prices.
The organization, which is committed to raising the social status and acceptability of the dalits, also helps the tillers farm collectively and repay loans through cooperative efforts.
And now the group is helping dalit laborers and farmers build livable houses, one more step in the Jagannathans’ efforts for a better life for dalits.
While Krishnammal Jagannathan is still active in the organization — she was on a bus traveling between two towns for it when called for this story — her husband is more frail and can no longer move around as before.
But the couple’s efforts continue to receive recognition, including one of the country’s highest awards, the Padmashri.
Last week Joseph Nye, the well-known China scholar, wrote on the Australian Strategic Policy Institute’s website about how war over Taiwan might be averted. He noted that years ago he was on a team that met with then-president Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁), “whose previous ‘unofficial’ visit to the US had caused a crisis in which China fired missiles into the sea and the US deployed carriers off the coast of Taiwan.” Yes, that’s right, mighty Chen caused that crisis all by himself. Neither the US nor the People’s Republic of China (PRC) exercised any agency. Nye then nostalgically invoked the comical specter
Relations between Taiwan and the Czech Republic have flourished in recent years. However, not everyone is pleased about the growing friendship between the two countries. Last month, an incident involving a Chinese diplomat tailing the car of vice president-elect Hsiao Bi-khim (蕭美琴) in Prague, drew public attention to the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) operations to undermine Taiwan overseas. The trip was not Hsiao’s first visit to the Central European country. It was meant to be low-key, a chance to meet with local academics and politicians, until her police escort noticed a car was tailing her through the Czech capital. The
April 15 to April 21 Yang Kui (楊逵) was horrified as he drove past trucks, oxcarts and trolleys loaded with coffins on his way to Tuntzechiao (屯子腳), which he heard had been completely destroyed. The friend he came to check on was safe, but most residents were suffering in the town hit the hardest by the 7.1-magnitude Hsinchu-Taichung Earthquake on April 21, 1935. It remains the deadliest in Taiwan’s recorded history, claiming around 3,300 lives and injuring nearly 12,000. The disaster completely flattened roughly 18,000 houses and damaged countless more. The social activist and
Over the course of former President Ma Ying-jeou’s (馬英九) 11-day trip to China that included a meeting with Chinese Communist Party (CCP) leader Xi Jinping (習近平) a surprising number of people commented that the former president was now “irrelevant.” Upon reflection, it became apparent that these comments were coming from pro-Taiwan, pan-green supporters and they were expressing what they hoped was the case, rather than the reality. Ma’s ideology is so pro-China (read: deep blue) and controversial that many in his own Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) hope he retires quickly, or at least refrains from speaking on some subjects. Regardless