The chance to see a legend like McCoy Tyner perform live is an exciting prospect for Taiwanese jazz fans, and perhaps even more so for musicians. The Taipei Times spoke with a few local jazz musicians, who gave their take on this year’s performers at the National Theater and Concert Hall’s 2008 Summer Jazz Party.
Kenny Garrett, who performs tomorrow night, “carries the [John] Coltrane spirit, but brings it to the alto sax,” says Tung Shuen-wen (董舜文), a teacher and saxophonist for Taipei combos JEG (這個爵士樂團) and the Rich Huang Jazz Band (黃瑞豐爵士樂團). Tung observes that Garrett is constantly looking for “new sounds,” which explains in part his interest in Asian music.
Pianist Hiromi Uehara, who performs this coming Thursday, displays a very physical approach to her instrument. She plays as “if she were trying to push [it] away,” says Tung.
Peng Yu-wen (彭郁雯), whose jazz fusion group Sizhukong (絲竹空) performs next week at the Experimental Theater (實驗劇場), agrees. “Her technique, her expression is very powerful … she sometimes sounds like a metal band,” she says. Peng, who also teaches jazz, notes that Uehara plays standards in a very “stylish” way, and admires the Japanese pianist’s “courage” in creating her compositions.
McCoy Tyner, who plays on Sept. 5, developed the “textbook” style of piano accompaniment for modern jazz during his time with the John Coltrane Quartet, says Tung. Tyner’s style is distinctive for his rhythmic style of playing. “He treats the piano as a drum set,” says Peng. And if you watch him carefully, says Tung, “you’ll notice that he’s a fast player, but you won’t feel the tempo.” Despite Tyner’s percussive style of playing, his sounds come out as a “melody line,” he said.
In addition to her personal touch, Dianne Reeves, who performs on Sept. 15, is a technically brilliant singer, says Tung. “She’s great at controlling her intonation. She can jump around her range, from high to low and [with precise pitch] … she sounds like a perfectly tuned instrument.”
But come performance time, don’t get caught up thinking about the musician’s styles and technical abilities. Tung’s advice? “Just get into the mood.”
The Nuclear Safety Commission (NSC, 核安會) on Sept. 24 approved the re-operation plan that Taiwan Power Co (Taipower, 台電) filed in March for the Ma-anshan Nuclear Power Plant in Pingtung County, after three rounds of review and 589 comments. Taipower now has to carry out the work in the plan and its own inspections on ageing, radiation and seismic resistance, then report back to the commission for review and on-site checks. Minister of Economic Affairs Kung Ming-hsin (龔明鑫) has named 2028 as the earliest restart. The NSC has given no date. THE DEBATE No challenge has been identified as to whether Ma-anshan
Cognitive warfare, says the Ministry of National Defense (MND), is the People’s Republic of China’s (PRC) use of “political, economic, cultural, military and legal means, with the intent to divide internal unity and undermine social stability” in Taiwan. Last week offered several examples. PRC media in October last year reported that the Chongqing Municipal Public Security Bureau had opened an investigation into Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) Legislator Puma Shen (沈伯洋), the DPP’s mayoral candidate for Taipei in next month’s election, for “Taiwan independence” activities. This was a cognitive warfare ploy, designed to unsettle the targeted person and to establish the idea
In pandemic preparedness work, scientists like to focus on the technical challenges: identifying pathogens, diagnosing infections, understanding their effects and developing vaccines and treatments. Each step promises progress through human innovation, investment and planning. The WHO, for example, brings experts together to identify and prioritize emerging disease threats and collect the evidence needed to prepare for them. But preparedness depends on more than scientific innovation. As the past week has shown, politics is the elephant in the room in all of this. No one could have predicted we would be talking about pneumonic plague, and that the death of a single
The South China Morning Post (SCMP) article from earlier this month on how Beijing would govern a post-annexation Taiwan (Amber Wang, “Beijing’s policy advisers map out how post-reunification Taiwan could be governed,” Oct. 6, 2026) is a reminder that even “peaceful” (coerced) occupation by the People’s Republic of China (PRC) will beggar Taiwan. The “scholars” cited in the SCMP piece argued that Taiwan would be governed in a manner similar to Hong Kong. As I observed in my piece for Monday (“Beijing’s intimidation tactics in Taiwan and beyond,” Oct. 12, 2026), that claim is simply a form of cognitive warfare. One