The publishers of this new book state in their accompanying promotional material "This is the first book to be published in English on the 2/28 Incident and White Terror." If true, it's an astonishing state of affairs. And Representing Atrocity in Taiwan itself isn't an account of those events either, but rather a consideration of how they were subsequently treated (when they were treated at all) by Taiwan's writers and filmmakers. This means the publishers are tacitly claiming there is still no English-language account at all of those terrible years.
Can this really be the case? There is George H. Kerr's Formosa Betrayed, though it's largely a personal memoir. And a look through Sylvia Li-chun Lin's bibliography here uncovers another title that appears to fit the bill: A Tragic Beginning: The Taiwan Uprising of February 28, 1947 by Tse-han Lai (賴澤涵), Raymond H. Meyers and Wei Wou (魏萼) (Stanford University Press, 1991). There's certainly some English material online, including Formosa Betrayed complete, even though the continuing unavailability of crucial documents is frequently lamented.
It's easy to understand why a full account of the years 1947 to 1987 is difficult. With any discussion of the 2/28 massacre forbidden, as it was prior to 1987, and any discussion of the disappearances and executions that followed it very dangerous, there must be a shortage of factual material. On the other hand Taiwan now enjoys what this author calls "unprecedented civil liberties that guarantee the freedoms of speech, press and congregation." And the world - which often in reality means the English-speaking world - surely needs as complete an account as possible of atrocities Lin compares in brutality to the Holocaust, the bombing of Hiroshima and Nagasaki, and the regime of Pol Pot.
Much of this book, though, is concerned with the contradictions that accompany the straightforward depiction of any historical event. Lin deals in depth with the widespread criticism of Hou Hsiao-hsien's (侯孝賢) film A City of Sadness (悲情城市) that erupted when it was released in 1989. This focused on the absence of any depiction of the central events of 2/28, as well as on the fact that the film showed local Taiwanese attacking Chinese of mainland extraction without any parallel portrayal of the much more serious assaults by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) military on the local population that prompted such reactions.
Lin argues that individuals remember different things and have separate viewpoints, and so there is no one "true" picture. Artists, too, tend to avoid producing anything that might look like propaganda, as any work showing the evils of 2/28 and the White Terror directly might appear to be. But this hasn't prevented writers and directors elsewhere from creating far more explicit historical depictions than have apparently appeared to date in Taiwan.
Lin argues books and films touching on these years allowed their audiences "to confront the fact that no historical experience can ever be completely recaptured on screen (or in writing)." This seems a rather sophisticated point for people who lost family members through state brutality to take on board. What ordinary people consider as "the truth" is something more basic and simple than this.
It's widely felt, for example, that Solzhenitsyn depicted such simple truth in books like The First Circle and One Day in the Life of Ivan Denisovich, that Tolstoy unambiguously showed the callousness of the 19th-century Russians in Chechnya in Hadji Murad, and that Orwell's Animal Farm offered an appropriate fable for what happened in the former Soviet Union under communism. Films such as Eisenstein's Battleship Potemkin and October displayed the Russian Revolution with little regard for dissenting viewpoints, and The Killing Fields showed the agony of Cambodia in the 1970s very directly.
Despite Lin's sympathetic analyses of what Taiwan's artists have managed to come up with, it can still be argued that something far more hard-hitting, and of epic stature, in literature and film, is both possible and desirable.
Sylvia Lin also points to women as popular images of suffering, even though, as she says, most of Taiwan's political victims were men, and looks at the issue of ethnicity in representations of Taiwan's history. Lin is, incidentally, a Taiwanese translator and scholar working in the US at the University of Notre Dame, Illinois, and is married to perhaps the most illustrious translator from Chinese into English that we have, Howard Goldblatt.
So - still no full account in English of Taiwan's years of state terror, and still no Taiwanese novels or films that depict the period's horrors head-on? This would appear to be the fundamental situation, only partially revealed by this nonetheless scrupulous and carefully argued book.
Possibly the reality is that modern Taiwan is simply too proud of its recent achievements to want to look back. The one-party state wasn't without its supporters, after all. "Most Taiwanese citizens," Lin writes of that earlier period, "accepted the government's position that these dissidents were in fact threatening national security and should be severely punished. The democratic ideal that a nation's citizens should be free to voice dissenting views without fear of persecution was completely alien to the majority of the Taiwanese, who deemed the fight for such rights as being seditious."
Despite such fighting talk, Representing Atrocity in Taiwan isn't the rallying cry this state of affairs ideally calls for. Instead, it looks scrupulously and honestly at the artistic results of the situation. So what is still needed is some young Taiwanese writer, some modern Emile Zola untouched by the academic proprieties, to bewail from the rooftops the continuing lack of a full account of such a hideously cruel, and indeed horrific, past, pointing the finger of accusation where he or she will.
April 28 to May 4 During the Japanese colonial era, a city’s “first” high school typically served Japanese students, while Taiwanese attended the “second” high school. Only in Taichung was this reversed. That’s because when Taichung First High School opened its doors on May 1, 1915 to serve Taiwanese students who were previously barred from secondary education, it was the only high school in town. Former principal Hideo Azukisawa threatened to quit when the government in 1922 attempted to transfer the “first” designation to a new local high school for Japanese students, leading to this unusual situation. Prior to the Taichung First
The Ministry of Education last month proposed a nationwide ban on mobile devices in schools, aiming to curb concerns over student phone addiction. Under the revised regulation, which will take effect in August, teachers and schools will be required to collect mobile devices — including phones, laptops and wearables devices — for safekeeping during school hours, unless they are being used for educational purposes. For Chang Fong-ching (張鳳琴), the ban will have a positive impact. “It’s a good move,” says the professor in the department of
On April 17, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) launched a bold campaign to revive and revitalize the KMT base by calling for an impromptu rally at the Taipei prosecutor’s offices to protest recent arrests of KMT recall campaigners over allegations of forgery and fraud involving signatures of dead voters. The protest had no time to apply for permits and was illegal, but that played into the sense of opposition grievance at alleged weaponization of the judiciary by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) to “annihilate” the opposition parties. Blamed for faltering recall campaigns and faced with a KMT chair
Article 2 of the Additional Articles of the Constitution of the Republic of China (中華民國憲法增修條文) stipulates that upon a vote of no confidence in the premier, the president can dissolve the legislature within 10 days. If the legislature is dissolved, a new legislative election must be held within 60 days, and the legislators’ terms will then be reckoned from that election. Two weeks ago Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) proposed that the legislature hold a vote of no confidence in the premier and dare the president to dissolve the legislature. The legislature is currently controlled
RSS