Simon Rattle is already on his second cup of Starbucks' finest before he starts his rehearsal at the Royal Opera House, Covent Garden, for a production of Debussy's only opera, Pelleas et Melisande. After a run-through of the first scene of act three, he's not completely happy. "It's a bit early in the morning: we need to find our velvety sound; it still sounds too heavy." He wants more from the orchestra's cello section; one chord, maybe the most violent moment in the whole piece, needs to be played like a "small nuclear explosion."
What's miraculous is that in the space of an hour or so, Rattle transforms the sound of the Royal Opera orchestra. Instead of the lumpen playing at the start, there is shimmering, atmospheric brilliance. The singers grow in confidence as imperfections of ensemble are ironed out, and the performance blooms. It's an object lesson in how to rehearse, a revelation of Rattle's gifts as a communicator, verbally and gesturally coaxing the best out of his musicians.
Rattle's rise from UK-born wunderkind, to savior of the City of Birmingham Symphony Orchestra, and, in 2002, to his assumption of the most challenging job in music at the age of just 47, is the stuff of legend. His has been a near faultless progress from teenage prodigy to elder statesman. During his time in Birmingham, from 1980 to 1998, Rattle could do no wrong. As a public advocate for serious music and music education, Rattle was classical music's most powerful and vocal ambassador. When he left the CBSO in 1998, he had the musical world at his feet, but the Berlin job was always going to be the most tempting. Ever since his debut with the Berliners in 1987 with Mahler's Sixth Symphony, they were the players that inspired him most. And, in June 1999, the orchestra voted for Rattle over Daniel Barenboim to replace Claudio Abbado as their maestro.
PHOTOS: EPA
But it hasn't all been plain sailing. For the first time in his career, Rattle has faced a critical onslaught, from sections of the German media. At the same time, the British press have used his success abroad as a chance to put the boot in. "The Tony Blair of classical music" is a common epithet, to suggest spin and a tarnished reputation. But it's not a completely erroneous analogy. Like Blair, Rattle has tried to be all things to all people in Berlin, playing a huge variety of repertoire in his first five seasons, from Mahler to Mark-Anthony Turnage, Bernstein to Boulez, and inviting conductors such as French Baroque expert William Christie — whose early music style is a long way outside the Berliners' musical comfort zone — to train his players in a new musical versatility. After all, this is the orchestra that is the guardian of the central European tradition, the mighty Austro-German hegemony of Beethoven, Brahms, Bruckner and Mahler, not Rameau or Ravel. What Rattle is attempting is a musical form of multiculturalism, in which the orchestra's brilliance lies not so much in their competence in one repertoire, but how the musicians can adapt to different styles of music.
The fact that Debussy is so far from the heart of the Berlin Philharmonic's musical identity is at the root of the criticism of Rattle's time in Berlin: in moving away from the center of what the orchestra does, he's in danger of losing its musical essence. Rattle sees it differently. "Of course there's a huge debate about what is our Spielkultur [playing culture], and whether we should be playing new pieces that aren't in our Spielkultur. I mean, the answer is, of course you should be, and the question is, what can the Spielkultur bring to this new repertoire?" He compares the various styles of music he asks them to play to "putting on different clothes: I don't ask them to change their body. And of course, just as there's a danger in too much specialization, there's a danger in simply flying all over the globe."
But it's the body that's the problem. When Rattle first went to conduct in Berlin 20 years ago, he joked that it was the only orchestra he couldn't ask to produce a real Berlin Phil sound — "at least it broke the ice," he says. That sound was the indelible, Karajan-inspired voluptuousness that defined the reputation of the Berlin Phil around the world. "It's a real 'wuah' sound that starts underneath," he says, "a deep, bass-up sound, which is recognizably theirs. It's like an enormous heat source that comes at you, and you feel as though you can burn in it." It's also the most viscerally exciting sound in orchestral music: at the orchestra's recent Barbican concert in London, there were moments in Dvorak's Seventh Symphony when the sheer power of the playing, above all the string section and their titanic double-basses, seemed almost unbearably intense, like an untamed force of nature. It's a completely thrilling phenomenon; Rattle's problem is how to harness it.
Next season brings the biggest challenge of them all, the litmus test for any conductor of the Berlin Philharmonic: Rattle will conduct a Beethoven symphony cycle, his first with the orchestra (in 2002, he recorded a cycle of the nine symphonies with the Berliners' main rival for the "greatest orchestra in the world" tag, the Vienna Philharmonic). It seems like a return to what the orchestra knows best. Not so, says Rattle. "Part of the thing I've learned over the past few years is that this is an orchestra which doesn't have an enormous shared memory. There has been such a huge turnover of players in recent years, and many have never played a Beethoven cycle. It's now a very young orchestra, with many people in their 20s, and 20 different nationalities. Guy Braunstein, one of our sensational leaders, comes from a string quartet background. Angela Merkel asked us to play Beethoven Five for the Treaty of Rome concert earlier this year, and Guy was playing his first ever Beethoven Fifth. You would just not imagine! When we played that Dvorak Seven, nearly half of them had never played it. What was sweet was that a lot people said to me, 'You know, this is really a wonderful piece,' as though that was an incredible surprise, and even — the highest compliment — 'I like this symphony, it's almost like Brahms.'"
All this means Rattle has the chance to create a tradition in Berlin, not simply continue one. He's at pains to talk about how collaborative the players are in all this — "It's the kind of orchestra where, if you have 128 players, you're talking a minimum 150 opinions" — but ultimately, "it's my hands, or my baton, and that has to be its own authority." Off the podium, Rattle has also stamped his vision on the future of the Berlin Phil. He has won key political battles with the city, fighting for the orchestra's finances and salaries, and he set up the orchestra's first education department as soon as he arrived.
Rattle will always have something to prove in Berlin, to the orchestra, to his audiences, to his critics. But if anyone has the energy, drive, and force of will to deal with all this, it's him. What he is attempting is to have it both ways: to open Berlin up as an orchestra in terms of its repertoire and its relationship with the city, and develop the ensemble as the definitive orchestra in the core German tradition. It's not something you can do in five years, or even 10: it's a project that could last Rattle the rest of his musical life.
And he's prepared for the backlash that comes with the position. "Look, I would dearly love it if everyone enjoyed everything I did, but even I'm not that naive and optimistic. Anyone who conducts this orchestra is going to be the antichrist to somebody. Maybe I'm just more successful at being the antichrist than some others."
In late October of 1873 the government of Japan decided against sending a military expedition to Korea to force that nation to open trade relations. Across the government supporters of the expedition resigned immediately. The spectacle of revolt by disaffected samurai began to loom over Japanese politics. In January of 1874 disaffected samurai attacked a senior minister in Tokyo. A month later, a group of pro-Korea expedition and anti-foreign elements from Saga prefecture in Kyushu revolted, driven in part by high food prices stemming from poor harvests. Their leader, according to Edward Drea’s classic Japan’s Imperial Army, was a samurai
Located down a sideroad in old Wanhua District (萬華區), Waley Art (水谷藝術) has an established reputation for curating some of the more provocative indie art exhibitions in Taipei. And this month is no exception. Beyond the innocuous facade of a shophouse, the full three stories of the gallery space (including the basement) have been taken over by photographs, installation videos and abstract images courtesy of two creatives who hail from the opposite ends of the earth, Taiwan’s Hsu Yi-ting (許懿婷) and Germany’s Benjamin Janzen. “In 2019, I had an art residency in Europe,” Hsu says. “I met Benjamin in the lobby
April 22 to April 28 The true identity of the mastermind behind the Demon Gang (魔鬼黨) was undoubtedly on the minds of countless schoolchildren in late 1958. In the days leading up to the big reveal, more than 10,000 guesses were sent to Ta Hwa Publishing Co (大華文化社) for a chance to win prizes. The smash success of the comic series Great Battle Against the Demon Gang (大戰魔鬼黨) came as a surprise to author Yeh Hung-chia (葉宏甲), who had long given up on his dream after being jailed for 10 months in 1947 over political cartoons. Protagonist
A fossil jawbone found by a British girl and her father on a beach in Somerset, England belongs to a gigantic marine reptile dating to 202 million years ago that appears to have been among the largest animals ever on Earth. Researchers said on Wednesday the bone, called a surangular, was from a type of ocean-going reptile called an ichthyosaur. Based on its dimensions compared to the same bone in closely related ichthyosaurs, the researchers estimated that the Triassic Period creature, which they named Ichthyotitan severnensis, was between 22-26 meters long. That would make it perhaps the largest-known marine reptile and would