Having long been a way for politicians to burnish their bonafides with rural voters, hunting is steadily morphing into a high-class pursuit for the wealthiest and well-connected, say local officials in this rugged brush land of South Texas where US Vice President Dick Cheney accidentally shot one of his hunting companions.
As the availability of public gamelands has shrunk, private outings to special preserves like the Armstrong Ranch, where Cheney accidentally fired his 28-gauge shotgun at Texas lawyer Harry Whittington earlier this month, are fast becoming the only way to share in one of the state's most fabled pastimes, many here complain.
So when local residents hear outsiders describe how big ranch hunts are typical for those who live in this part of Texas, many respond with a roll of the eyes. "If you don't know somebody who owns a big ranch or unless you're quite well off you don't get invited on these special hunts," said Chuck Shipley, 65, who runs the state's visitor center in Kingsville, 80km north on Route 77 of the Armstrong Ranch. "It's not like it used to be. It's pretty expensive to hunt in Texas."
PHOTO: NY TIMES NEWS SERVICE
But the cost means little to outside luminaries who gather at local ranches. Cheney was merely the latest in a stream of high rollers to hunt on one of the several massive ranches in the county, officials said.
"The big oil men, the chemical companies, all the bigwigs come down here to hunt," said Shipley. It's a far cry, he said, from the days when anyone with a rifle or shotgun could set out across the railroad tracks into the vast open spaces and hunt for deer, birds, and other varied wildlife found here.
Deep in the windswept plains of Kenedy County -- population about 400, with no restaurant or gas station in 2,253 square kilometers -- the Armstrong Ranch, like the nearby Kenedy and King ranches, has been host to presidents and princes.
PHOTO: NY TIMES NEWS SERVICE
Britain's Prince Charles once played a polo match on the 20,234 hectare spread in the Lower Rio Grande Valley between the Gulf of Mexico and the Mexican border. Both presidents Bush have been to the ranches here several times, according to locals.
Settled in 1882 by John Armstrong III, a lawman famed for capturing the outlaw John Wesley Hardin, it became the homestead for a powerful family that mixed rugged ranch life with Harvard and Yale educations and has been a fixture in Texas Republican politics for generations.
The founder's son, Tom, became one of the first executives for the Standard Oil Company in the early part of the 20th century. The late Tobin Armstrong, who died last fall, was a top fund-raiser for the Bush-Cheney reelection campaign, collecting more than US$100,000 in 2004.
There are an estimated 20 million active hunters in the US, according to industry groups. More than one million Texans alone apply for hunting licenses each year, according state wildlife figures.
And politics and hunting have long been inextricably linked here, as politicians have sought to embody the rugged individualism of the only state in the union that was once an independent republic.
"Hunting is deeply ingrained in our folklore and heritage," said Thomas Myers, a political science professor who teaches state government at Baylor University in Waco, Texas, and who grew up on a ranch. "Just like [former US president] Richard Nixon watched the Washington Redskins play football, here you go kill Bambi or some birds and you're part of one of the boys."
Former US president Lyndon B. Johnson was famous for driving his guests around his vast Texas ranch. US President George W. Bush, when he ran for governor in 1994, went hunting at the same event as his Democratic rival, then-governor Ann Richards, as each sought to burnish their credentials as average Texans.
Former US president Bill Clinton acknowledged in his memoirs that he believed Democrats lost to the Republicans in 2000 because they failed to appeal to hunters like Bush did. In 2004, both Bush and Democratic presidential nominee John Kerry devoted parts of their Web sites to hunters.
But hunting is no longer a surefire way to connect with blue-collar voters, say many in Texas. These days, the sport is more often associated with millionaires than backwoodsmen.
"In recent years there has been the sale of tens of millions of hectares of public lands for private mining and logging which is no longer accessible to the blue-collar hunter," said John Rosenthal, president and co-founder of the American Hunters and Shooters Association in Frederick, Maryland.
"The lack of access to public hunting lands is the number one reason that hunters drop out of the sport," added Bill Brassard of the National Shooting Sports Foundation in Newtown, Connecticut "There appears to be a trend toward pay-to-hunt operations."
On the King Ranch's 333,865 hectares, a one-day deer hunt costs at least US$1,000 per person, according to the ranch's Web site. Quail is US$450 per gun per day. A three-day outing could cost US$5,500 or more. In Sarita, the only town in county, where the elementary school for ranch workers' children and county offices are located, Diana Mata, the dispatcher for the Kenedy County Sheriff's Office, said she remains an avid deer hunter. But "unless you know someone on the property, it's not as easy to go hunting anymore."
Oct. 27 to Nov. 2 Over a breakfast of soymilk and fried dough costing less than NT$400, seven officials and engineers agreed on a NT$400 million plan — unaware that it would mark the beginning of Taiwan’s semiconductor empire. It was a cold February morning in 1974. Gathered at the unassuming shop were Economics minister Sun Yun-hsuan (孫運璿), director-general of Transportation and Communications Kao Yu-shu (高玉樹), Industrial Technology Research Institute (ITRI) president Wang Chao-chen (王兆振), Telecommunications Laboratories director Kang Pao-huang (康寶煌), Executive Yuan secretary-general Fei Hua (費驊), director-general of Telecommunications Fang Hsien-chi (方賢齊) and Radio Corporation of America (RCA) Laboratories director Pan
President William Lai (賴清德) has championed Taiwan as an “AI Island” — an artificial intelligence (AI) hub powering the global tech economy. But without major shifts in talent, funding and strategic direction, this vision risks becoming a static fortress: indispensable, yet immobile and vulnerable. It’s time to reframe Taiwan’s ambition. Time to move from a resource-rich AI island to an AI Armada. Why change metaphors? Because choosing the right metaphor shapes both understanding and strategy. The “AI Island” frames our national ambition as a static fortress that, while valuable, is still vulnerable and reactive. Shifting our metaphor to an “AI Armada”
When Taiwan was battered by storms this summer, the only crumb of comfort I could take was knowing that some advice I’d drafted several weeks earlier had been correct. Regarding the Southern Cross-Island Highway (南橫公路), a spectacular high-elevation route connecting Taiwan’s southwest with the country’s southeast, I’d written: “The precarious existence of this road cannot be overstated; those hoping to drive or ride all the way across should have a backup plan.” As this article was going to press, the middle section of the highway, between Meishankou (梅山口) in Kaohsiung and Siangyang (向陽) in Taitung County, was still closed to outsiders
The older you get, and the more obsessed with your health, the more it feels as if life comes down to numbers: how many more years you can expect; your lean body mass; your percentage of visceral fat; how dense your bones are; how many kilos you can squat; how long you can deadhang; how often you still do it; your levels of LDL and HDL cholesterol; your resting heart rate; your overnight blood oxygen level; how quickly you can run; how many steps you do in a day; how many hours you sleep; how fast you are shrinking; how