Even by the standards of today's global terrorism, it was a bold and brazen act: sneaking 36 barrels of gunpowder under the Houses of Parliament and blowing England's power elite to smithereens.
Tonight, the night sky across Britain will be alive with bonfires and pyrotechnics for the 400th anniversary of the gunpowder plot -- an unofficial holiday better known as Bonfire Night or Guy Fawkes Day.
Comparisons with the July 7 attacks in London, in which 52 subway and bus commuters were killed by four apparent Islamist suicide bombers in the deadliest act of terrorism ever on British soil, may perhaps be inevitable.
PHOTOS: AFP
Enduring, however, will be the popular fascination with Fawkes and his co-conspirators, drawn from a then-repressed Catholic minority who apparently felt that the nation, by embracing Protestantism, was treading the wrong path.
More than 50,000 people have already visited a gunpowder plot exhibition since it opened in July in the Gothic parliament buildings on the banks of the River Thames -- ground zero for the blast that might have been.
"Obviously there is a resonance [to contemporary terrorism], but we'd rather like people to come to their own conclusions," said the exhibition's project manager David Prior.
Other commemorations are underway at the Tower of London, the National Portrait Gallery, the National Archives (where Fawkes' signed confession is on display) and the Shakespearean Globe theater.
In a turn unthinkable for the likes of Osama bin Laden or the Irish Republican Army, the Museum of London is holding a day-long study today titled: "Understanding Guy Fawkes."
In southeast England, meanwhile, huge crowds are once again expected in the sleepy town of Lewes, East Sussex for Britain's biggest Nov. 5 gathering, a night of bonfires, fireworks, effigies and residual anti-Papist motifs.
Exactly how the gunpowder plot was cooked up is a fact lost in the haze of time, according to a fact sheet helpfully provided by the House of Commons information office on its Web site (www.parliament.gov.uk).
"Generations of historians accepted it as a genuine last desperate attempt to re-establish the Catholic religion," although another theory is that the plotters were actually agents provocateur aiming to discredit Catholics and reinforce Protestantism, it said.
One way or another, Fawkes and his original gang of four co-conspirators -- the numbers grew in time, making it harder to keep secrecy -- decided in 1604 to blow up parliament on Nov. 5, 1605, the day of its state opening.
The king would be there, along with his heir apparent, and every member of the House of Commons and the House of Lords.
The 36 barrels of gunpowder, big and small, were smuggled into a coal room beneath the parliament leased by one of the conspirators, and the plan was for army veteran Fawkes to light the fuses and then skedaddle to mainland Europe.
The official version is that a Catholic peer got a timely tip off, prompting a midnight search in which Fawkes was cornered in the basement with his deadly pile of barrels hidden under black coal.
While all the conspirators were rounded up, Londoners rejoiced on the streets at the plot's failure.
The scene turned gruesome in subsequent months as Fawkes and his cohorts, in the fashion of the day, were tried, tortured, disemboweled alive, then hanged and quartered for treason.
Exactly how much destruction they would have wrought in the heart of London has been and remains today a topic of heated scholarly debate.
Researchers at the University of Wales reckoned two years ago that the blast would have devastated a 490m radius -- an area that would include today's Downing Street, Foreign Office and Ministry of Defense.
But an ambitious re-creation of the blast by ITV television, using sensors and crash-test dummies, suggested that the impact would have been relatively contained, though with debris raining over 200m.
"We concluded that he [Fawkes] could have killed everyone present with half the amount of explosive," added David Hadden, a blast consultant on The Gunpowder Plot: Exploding the Legend.
Historian Justin Pollard told the program: "The whole plot was massively ill-conceived."
"They seemed to think they could change the politics of the whole country by blowing up a few hundred people."
"In reality, the blast would have sent shockwaves through the Protestant community, bolstering their resolve against the hugely outnumbered Catholics and sparking ruthless revenge."
The Han Kuang exercises in August simulated the repelling of attackers from the People’s Republic of China (PRC). One scenario saw the PRC seizing Taipei International Airport (Songshan airport) in a daring helicopter assault. The airport is a key military operations center, and its seizure or destruction in a PRC invasion would be inevitable. Yet that is hardly the only conflict involving Songshan. Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an’s (蔣萬安) recent, surprising suggestion that the airport be converted to an AI park is just the latest variation on an old theme. Replacing Songshan airport with some kind of green or park space
In pandemic preparedness work, scientists like to focus on the technical challenges: identifying pathogens, diagnosing infections, understanding their effects and developing vaccines and treatments. Each step promises progress through human innovation, investment and planning. The WHO, for example, brings experts together to identify and prioritize emerging disease threats and collect the evidence needed to prepare for them. But preparedness depends on more than scientific innovation. As the past week has shown, politics is the elephant in the room in all of this. No one could have predicted we would be talking about pneumonic plague, and that the death of a single
The South China Morning Post (SCMP) article from earlier this month on how Beijing would govern a post-annexation Taiwan (Amber Wang, “Beijing’s policy advisers map out how post-reunification Taiwan could be governed,” Oct. 6, 2026) is a reminder that even “peaceful” (coerced) occupation by the People’s Republic of China (PRC) will beggar Taiwan. The “scholars” cited in the SCMP piece argued that Taiwan would be governed in a manner similar to Hong Kong. As I observed in my piece for Monday (“Beijing’s intimidation tactics in Taiwan and beyond,” Oct. 12, 2026), that claim is simply a form of cognitive warfare. One
Since Russia invaded more than four years ago, Ukraine has become a global leader in military drone innovation, enabling its forces to grind a much larger enemy to a stalemate. But this technological force multiplier has come with an unsettling vulnerability: Ukrainian drone makers are highly dependent on electronics made by China, a key Russian ally. Ukraine’s greatest fear is that the Chinese government could severely restrict its access to these critical parts. It also worries that Russian defense companies that need these same supplies could be given preferential treatment by Chinese factories. Over the past two years, Ukraine has sought to break
RSS