Washed by a southwesterly Pacific breeze, a line of B-52 Stratofortress bombers stand parked on the hot tarmac here, their tails stenciled with "MT," a reminder that they flew here recently from the snows of Minot, North Dakota.
Away for more than a decade, the B-52s, the US' largest bombers, are back in Guam, part of a wide-ranging drive by the Pentagon to make this island, a US territory, a "power projection hub" on the edge of Asia.
"We are openly talking about putting a fighter wing there, a tanker squadron there, a Global Hawk group there," General William Begert, commander of Pacific Air Forces, said by telephone from Hawaii, almost 4,000 miles (6,437km) east of here. The Global Hawk is an unmanned surveillance plane.
PHOTO: NY TIMES
"Guam, first of all, is US territory," Begert said. "I don't need overflight rights. I don't need landing rights. I always have permission to go to Guam. It might as well be California or New Jersey."
Next year, Washington is to decide on a new round of base closings, the first in a decade. Opening the debate, US Defense Secretary Donald Rumsfeld reported to the US Congress on March 23 that the military had 24 percent more base capacity than it needed.
Judging by Rumsfeld's comments after his trip here last November, Guam will be a winner in the base-closing process. This volcanic island fits the Pentagon's new strategy of creating "lily pads" to allow for rapid deployment of military muscle.
"Rumsfeld keeps saying, `What about Guam? Let's build up Guam,"' said a US diplomat in Tokyo, where the defense secretary stopped after visiting here. American memories are still sharp of the Navy's loss of a base at Subic Bay, the Philippines, in 1992 after the Philippine Senate refused to extend the lease. The diplomat added, "We don't want to be somewhere where they don't want us, where they can throw us out."
At US Naval Forces Marianias, the naval station here, Rear Admiral Arthur Johnson, the commander, said the wars in Iraq and Afghanistan had raised Guam's strategic value as the Pentagon realized the usefulness of an all-American outpost in Asia.
US interests
"We invested huge amounts of money in facilities we could not use when we needed them, for example Saudi Arabia," Johnson. "Places where the US is autonomous have come greatly to the fore."
Military officials here decline to discuss how Guam would fit into a US response to the rapid rise of China. But by moving ships and submarines to Guam, the Pentagon cuts "the tyranny of distance," trimming five days off a Pacific crossing from Hawaii, said Richard Halloran, a military analyst based in Hawaii.
"A lot of these moves are intended to deter China," Halloran, a freelance military writer, said from Honolulu, where the US Pacific Command is based. "You are not threatening China, not in any way jeopardizing their security. On the other hand, if China becomes belligerent, you are in position to do something about it, particularly with the submarines and an aircraft carrier."
Carl Peterson, a businessman on Guam, said of Washington's low-key military buildup on Guam: "It just sort of happens. Why disclose it? Why tell the Chinese what you are going to do before you do it?"
Later this year, a new nuclear-powered attack submarine is to arrive here, the third to make Guam its home port since 2002. While Washington debates whether an aircraft carrier should come here or to Hawaii, Guam's outer harbor is being dredged and World War II-era wharves are to be repaired for more efficient munitions handling.
"Guam's geostrategic importance cannot be overstated," Admiral Thomas Fargo, the senior military officer in the Pacific, with 300,000 soldiers, sailors and marines under his command, said in testimony before the House Armed Services Committee on March 31. "Both Navy and Air Force facilities will continue to figure prominently in Guam's increasing role as a power projection hub."
Across the naval station here, new housing is being built, part of a near-doubling of military spending on the island from levels of a decade ago.
"Guam is no longer the trailer park of the Pacific," Johnson said of the new military investment. "Guam has emerged from backwater status to the center of the radar screen. This is rapidly becoming a focus for logistics, for strategic planning."
Washington's investment in Guam is most easily seen from the catwalk of Andersen's 13-story air traffic control tower.
In clockwise order, work is under way on an air-conditioned, typhoon-resistant hangar for B-1 bombers, a huge war reserve material warehouse, a new base exchange shopping center, a new fitness and health center and a new base security center. Out of sight, new underground pipes are delivering aviation fuel directly to parking pads for jets, and the first of 60 munitions storage "igloos" are being built. To foil terrorists, workers are drilling water wells on base and are burying power lines off base.
"This is by far the largest amount of construction I have seen at any Air Force base in my years in the service," said Captain David Vandenburg, a 29-year-old Oklahoman who is chief of base development.
While new apartments, fitness centers and military support offices are not particularly glamorous, they are essential for increasing what Captain David Boone, a Navy Seabee, calls Guam's "surge capacity." In a military emergency, the island could quickly swell with planes, submarines, and ships.
"The real trick for me is to figure out how many people are going to be living here 10 years from now," said Captain Boone, who has command of military construction on Guam. "It is a moving target."
Guam has been a supply base since Spanish galleons from Manila stopped here to pick up fresh water and food before crossing the Pacific to Acapulco, Mexico. In the late 19th century, the island was a Spanish coaling station. In recent decades, Air Force pilots dubbed Guam "the world's largest gas station." The US gained control in 1898 after the Spanish-American War.
Training for war
But it is increasingly being used for training. The Marines have rented typhoon-damaged structures for urban warfare exercises. Rural warfare training has been conducted in the southern jungles, forests so thick that one holdout Japanese soldier from World War II was captured only in 1972.
During the December 1972 bombing of North Vietnam, more than 150 B-52s flew from here. On a recent morning, bulldozers and pavers were upgrading the acres of tarmac that make Andersen comparable to a major international airport.
In this treeless landscape, even B-52s look small. In the shade of one the planes' huge, drooping wings, Master Sargent Ralph Gillikan, a mechanic last stationed at the North Dakota base, surveyed the surrounding sea of concrete and said, "The parking here is good."
Oct. 27 to Nov. 2 Over a breakfast of soymilk and fried dough costing less than NT$400, seven officials and engineers agreed on a NT$400 million plan — unaware that it would mark the beginning of Taiwan’s semiconductor empire. It was a cold February morning in 1974. Gathered at the unassuming shop were Economics minister Sun Yun-hsuan (孫運璿), director-general of Transportation and Communications Kao Yu-shu (高玉樹), Industrial Technology Research Institute (ITRI) president Wang Chao-chen (王兆振), Telecommunications Laboratories director Kang Pao-huang (康寶煌), Executive Yuan secretary-general Fei Hua (費驊), director-general of Telecommunications Fang Hsien-chi (方賢齊) and Radio Corporation of America (RCA) Laboratories director Pan
The classic warmth of a good old-fashioned izakaya beckons you in, all cozy nooks and dark wood finishes, as tables order a third round and waiters sling tapas-sized bites and assorted — sometimes unidentifiable — skewered meats. But there’s a romantic hush about this Ximending (西門町) hotspot, with cocktails savored, plating elegant and never rushed and daters and diners lit by candlelight and chandelier. Each chair is mismatched and the assorted tables appear to be the fanciest picks from a nearby flea market. A naked sewing mannequin stands in a dimly lit corner, adorned with antique mirrors and draped foliage
The consensus on the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chair race is that Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) ran a populist, ideological back-to-basics campaign and soundly defeated former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), the candidate backed by the big institutional players. Cheng tapped into a wave of popular enthusiasm within the KMT, while the institutional players’ get-out-the-vote abilities fell flat, suggesting their power has weakened significantly. Yet, a closer look at the race paints a more complicated picture, raising questions about some analysts’ conclusions, including my own. TURNOUT Here is a surprising statistic: Turnout was 130,678, or 39.46 percent of the 331,145 eligible party
The election of Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) as chair of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) marked a triumphant return of pride in the “Chinese” in the party name. Cheng wants Taiwanese to be proud to call themselves Chinese again. The unambiguous winner was a return to the KMT ideology that formed in the early 2000s under then chairman Lien Chan (連戰) and president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) put into practice as far as he could, until ultimately thwarted by hundreds of thousands of protestors thronging the streets in what became known as the Sunflower movement in 2014. Cheng is an unambiguous Chinese ethnonationalist,
RSS