Even as Allied troops were liberating France in the summer of 1944, General Charles de Gaulle was constructing the myth that the French had heroically resisted German occupation. It was to prove a hardy myth, one that helped France bury the humiliation of its recent past and face the future with some unity. Yet when the myth began crumbling in the 1970s, it was gradually replaced by a no less simplistic version of history: that France was a nation of collaborators who stood by indifferently as tens of thousands of Jews were deported to Nazi death camps.
To those trapped in the perennial resistance-versus-collaboration debate, Robert Gildea has done a great service in his new book, Marianne in Chains: Daily Life in the Heart of France During the German Occupation. Instead of looking at wartime France top-down, he has focused on grass-roots experiences in a tranche of western France stretching from Tours along the Loire Valley to the Atlantic port of St.-Nazaire. And he has done so by studying departmental, municipal and parish records, perusing private journals and listening to aged survivors.
Gildea's considerable achievement is to blur the debate.
"What is most striking about the French under the occupation is not how heroic or villainous they were but how imaginative, creative and resourceful they were in pursuit of a better life," he writes. In other words, recognizing that alone they could not drive out the Germans, they tried to survive as best they could. This meant holding on to jobs, finding food, helping relatives and, where possible, having some fun. It also meant coexisting with the occupiers, for which informal rules were drawn up.
"Socially, it was acceptable to drink with a German in a bar but not to invite him home," Gildea writes. "If a German was billeted on a family, it was not thought proper that he should dine at the family table. Flirting with Germans was normal and to have sex with them for money was not a crime, particularly as the German military was very worried about its men catching V.D. Exaggerated merrymaking by French women and German soldiers was frowned on, however, while affairs with Germans by married women such as wives of POWs was beyond the pale on every count."
At first, French officials, from prefects and subprefects to mayors and municipal councilors, served as buffers between the German military and the population at large. Further, since many had held office in the late 1930s, they provided continuity. Outside cities like Tours, Angers and Nantes, the region's mood was traditionally conservative. And this led many French to share the view of Marshal Henri Philippe Petain, the head of the collaborationist Vichy regime, that communism posed a greater threat to France than Germany. Unsurprisingly, the Resistance, dominated by communists until late 1943, made little headway in the zone.
Gildea, a professor of modern European history at Oxford University, skillfully details the constant give-and-take between occupier and occupied. For instance, Germany did not ban labor unions and it even tolerated strikes over wages, but it insisted on sending skilled Frenchmen to work in Germany. Similarly, it permitted steamy movies (which Vichy considered immoral), but it punished heckling during pro-Nazi newsreels. On the French side, opposition took the form of graffiti or painted "V" signs or wreaths laid with a message, but nothing more daring.
By mid-1942, however, as the Gestapo began replacing German military administrators, French officialdom's room for maneuver disappeared. Already in July 1942, French police in the region took part in the arrest of hundreds of Jews, who were sent to the Drancy transit camp near Paris. Gildea quotes a police report warning that "many are not hiding their sympathy for those who appear to be victims of persecution." But others, Gildea adds, moved quickly to take over property abandoned by local Jews. Soon, though, not only "Judeo-Bolshevik demons" but anyone suspected of opposition was liable to arrest and deportation.
Just as Gildea tracks how local politicians adjusted to the occupation, he again follows them preparing for the liberation. Many mayors, for example, resigned their jobs. Other officials began making discreet contact with Resistance groups in France and abroad. "Officials who wanted to survive needed to play a double game, giving the appearance of loyalty while working in the dark to protect French interests," Gildea notes. The French response to Allied bombing of industrial zones was also ambivalent: lamented, but not opposed.
Once the region was freed in August 1944, de Gaulle's envoys quickly ratified all but the most detested officials in their posts as a way of forestalling any communist grab for power. Some summary justice took place -- a few lynchings and many women's heads shaven for "horizontal collaboration" with the enemy -- but amid food shortages, day-to-day survival soon took priority. And in Gildea's view, the general response to liberation was one of disappointment. Life for returning prisoners of war and deportees (and a few Jews who had survived in hiding) proved particularly difficult.
In fact, as Marianne in Chains so powerfully demonstrates, little was quite as it was remembered five decades later. "Franco-German relations under the occupation were not always as brutal or even one-sided as they have often been portrayed," Gildea writes. Nor was the Vichy regime as authoritarian or reactionary as many recall. But a different official memory soon took shape.
In late October of 1873 the government of Japan decided against sending a military expedition to Korea to force that nation to open trade relations. Across the government supporters of the expedition resigned immediately. The spectacle of revolt by disaffected samurai began to loom over Japanese politics. In January of 1874 disaffected samurai attacked a senior minister in Tokyo. A month later, a group of pro-Korea expedition and anti-foreign elements from Saga prefecture in Kyushu revolted, driven in part by high food prices stemming from poor harvests. Their leader, according to Edward Drea’s classic Japan’s Imperial Army, was a samurai
Located down a sideroad in old Wanhua District (萬華區), Waley Art (水谷藝術) has an established reputation for curating some of the more provocative indie art exhibitions in Taipei. And this month is no exception. Beyond the innocuous facade of a shophouse, the full three stories of the gallery space (including the basement) have been taken over by photographs, installation videos and abstract images courtesy of two creatives who hail from the opposite ends of the earth, Taiwan’s Hsu Yi-ting (許懿婷) and Germany’s Benjamin Janzen. “In 2019, I had an art residency in Europe,” Hsu says. “I met Benjamin in the lobby
April 22 to April 28 The true identity of the mastermind behind the Demon Gang (魔鬼黨) was undoubtedly on the minds of countless schoolchildren in late 1958. In the days leading up to the big reveal, more than 10,000 guesses were sent to Ta Hwa Publishing Co (大華文化社) for a chance to win prizes. The smash success of the comic series Great Battle Against the Demon Gang (大戰魔鬼黨) came as a surprise to author Yeh Hung-chia (葉宏甲), who had long given up on his dream after being jailed for 10 months in 1947 over political cartoons. Protagonist
A fossil jawbone found by a British girl and her father on a beach in Somerset, England belongs to a gigantic marine reptile dating to 202 million years ago that appears to have been among the largest animals ever on Earth. Researchers said on Wednesday the bone, called a surangular, was from a type of ocean-going reptile called an ichthyosaur. Based on its dimensions compared to the same bone in closely related ichthyosaurs, the researchers estimated that the Triassic Period creature, which they named Ichthyotitan severnensis, was between 22-26 meters long. That would make it perhaps the largest-known marine reptile and would