"China's opening up!" a Beijing friend said to me not so long ago. "Come and see! We're not as closed as we were before!" In the end I didn't go. But I wondered, was this really true? And if it was, what exactly did it mean?
The whole idea of China "opening up" has a long history. Japan was successfully pressured to "open up" by the West in the 19th century, and more recently China has been subjected to similar treatment. In this context, "opening up" meant opening markets to foreign goods. But my Beijing acquaintance used the phrase in a different sense. To him it meant a general willingness to be receptive to foreign ideas, possibly even including a more open flow of information. China was "opening up" and wasn't turning its back on the outside world in the way that was customary not so long ago.
James Farrer's Opening Up is mostly about Shanghai's nightclub culture, and the author clearly means the phrase in yet another sense -- the opening up of China to Western sexual lifestyles. In fact its subtitle -- "Youth Sex Culture and Market Reform in Shanghai" -- shows an intention to combine the trade and the lifestyle meanings. It even suggests that if you have the one, the other will follow, though which comes first isn't clear. Do more Boots cosmetics lead to an uninhibited sex life, or is it the other way round? Either way it's probably good for business. "Spend" was a Victorian term for "experience orgasm." So the West's moral for China, it would seem, could be seen as being one of "Spend, spend, spend" -- in both senses of the word.
Farrer begins his book by recounting a memory of teaching in a language school in Taipei in 1989. Against the background of the student activism in China, one of his coworkers tells him a story of a wild affair he had with a young woman working at his Beijing hotel. Were such things really possible in China, Farrer mused, comparing the China he imagined with the lively Taipei he knew even in those days.
Four years later he was himself living on the mainland, researching Shanghai nightclubs and the youth culture generally. He tells how he fell in love with a Chinese girl and three years later they were married.
Today he is an assistant professor of sociology at Tokyo's Sophia University, and this book is essentially a sociological look at Shanghai's sexual world. Many readers wondered after the publication of Wei Hui's Shanghai Baby if the city really boasted the sophisticated lifestyle and affluence so casually presented, even taken for granted, in that novel. This survey is a far more reliable guide to the truth of the matter than any work of fiction.
Openness about erotic matters -- one night stands, acceptance of premarital sex by women, and so on -- is clearly increasing on the evidence the book presents. But the percentage of the population involved in the clubbing culture it largely focuses on is, of course, in reality very small. Gays and lesbians are sometimes perceived, in Taipei and in Western cities, as having led the way in sexual honesty, even though in Taiwan they frequently see themselves as being unable to be completely "open." It is strange, therefore, that this large urban minority receives little coverage in Farrer's book. Perhaps he simply didn't know where to look. Opening Up is basically a work of scholarship, but because it contains extensive interview material with young Shanghainese about their sex lives it makes intriguing reading. And the University of Chicago Press is clearly anxious to market it as a book of general interest.
Variety is the over-riding impression the study conveys. There are stories of Western women who are amazed at the unending series of casual affairs they are able to experience, of local "playboys" who enjoy a status at disco pubs they can't hope to have during working hours, of slow romantic dances in near-darkness, head-shaking drug fads, dance-floor fights, and the expulsion from college of student couples when the girl becomes pregnant. No simple, single pattern emerges.
Relationships between Shanghai women and foreign men are discussed at some length. At one point the author lists several characteristics of such situations -- the introduction of a woman into the unfamiliar social circle of foreign men and their Chinese girlfriends, sex with no strings attached as typifying "foreign ways," the initial acceptance by the girl of a short-term relationship and then a break-up when she expresses hopes of a long-term one, and the perception of marriage to even an unsuitable foreigner as a quick route to emigration.
For many of both sexes, however, romance is more what they're looking for than sex as such. One group of informants tells the author that flowers, visits to coffee shops and special presents are more important than physical contact. "Romance" was a word that came to Shanghai only in the 1990s, someone asserts -- before then they didn't have anything like that. The older view was that something like "comfortable feeling" was what characterized ideal relations between the sexes.
It's impossible not to recognize some Taiwanese attitudes here, mixed in with other aspects of life that are unfamiliar. Even so, the perspective, from Taipei at least, feels for the most part like a view from a different world.
The author describes himself as having been "an inveterate participant in Shanghai's nightlife," visiting some type of club or disco two to four times a week during most of his stay. He also interviewed elementary schoolteachers who he taught for a semester in 1995, and these, as a "generally less sexually active group," offered a different and useful perspective against which to measure the others. He also interviewed magazine editors and fiction writers, and was helped on a daily basis by his mother-in-law who assiduously collected and filed newspaper clippings for him.
So, is Shanghai sexually "open"? The author's conclusion is, "Yes and no." And it's important to remember that, for all the relatively relaxed attitudes detected in this book, China is nonetheless still a place where Shanghai Baby was banned in the spring of 2000, less than three years ago.
For better or for worse, it seems, Shanghai, and China generally, are embracing Western patterns with more than a modicum of caution.
May 11 to May 17 Traversing the southern slopes of the Yushan Range in 1931, Japanese naturalist Tadao Kano knew he was approaching the last swath of Taiwan still beyond colonial control. The “vast, unknown territory,” protected by the “fierce” Bunun headman Dahu Ali, was “filled with an utterly endless jungle that choked the mountains and valleys,” Kano wrote. He noted how the group had “refused to submit to the measures of our authorities and entrenched themselves deep in these mountains … living a free existence spent chasing deer in the morning and seeking serow in the evening,” even describing them as
As a different column was being written, the big news dropped that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) announced that negotiations within his caucus, with legislative speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) of the KMT, party Chair Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chair Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) had produced a compromise special military budget proposal. On Thursday morning, prior to meeting with Cheng over a lunch of beef noodles, Lu reiterated her support for a budget of NT$800 or NT$900 billion — but refused to comment after the meeting. Right after Fu’s
Yesterday, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) nominated legislator Puma Shen (沈伯洋) as their Taipei mayoral candidate, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) put their stamp of approval on Wei Ping-cheng (魏平政) as their candidate for Changhua County commissioner and former legislator Tsai Pi-ru (蔡壁如) of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) has begun the process to also run in Changhua, though she has not yet been formally nominated. All three news items are bizarre. The DPP has struggled with settling on a Taipei nominee. The only candidate who declared interest was Enoch Wu (吳怡農), but the party seemed determined to nominate anyone
What government project has expropriated the most land in Taiwan? According to local media reports, it is the Taoyuan Aerotropolis, eating 2,500 hectares of land in its first phase, with more to come. Forty thousand people are expected to be displaced by the project. Naturally that enormous land grab is generating powerful pushback. Last week Chen Chien-ho (陳健和), a local resident of Jhuwei Borough (竹圍) in Taoyuan City’s Dayuan District (大園) filed a petition for constitutional review of the project after losing his case at the Taipei Administrative Court. The Administrative Court found in favor of nine other local landowners, but