"China's opening up!" a Beijing friend said to me not so long ago. "Come and see! We're not as closed as we were before!" In the end I didn't go. But I wondered, was this really true? And if it was, what exactly did it mean?
The whole idea of China "opening up" has a long history. Japan was successfully pressured to "open up" by the West in the 19th century, and more recently China has been subjected to similar treatment. In this context, "opening up" meant opening markets to foreign goods. But my Beijing acquaintance used the phrase in a different sense. To him it meant a general willingness to be receptive to foreign ideas, possibly even including a more open flow of information. China was "opening up" and wasn't turning its back on the outside world in the way that was customary not so long ago.
James Farrer's Opening Up is mostly about Shanghai's nightclub culture, and the author clearly means the phrase in yet another sense -- the opening up of China to Western sexual lifestyles. In fact its subtitle -- "Youth Sex Culture and Market Reform in Shanghai" -- shows an intention to combine the trade and the lifestyle meanings. It even suggests that if you have the one, the other will follow, though which comes first isn't clear. Do more Boots cosmetics lead to an uninhibited sex life, or is it the other way round? Either way it's probably good for business. "Spend" was a Victorian term for "experience orgasm." So the West's moral for China, it would seem, could be seen as being one of "Spend, spend, spend" -- in both senses of the word.
Farrer begins his book by recounting a memory of teaching in a language school in Taipei in 1989. Against the background of the student activism in China, one of his coworkers tells him a story of a wild affair he had with a young woman working at his Beijing hotel. Were such things really possible in China, Farrer mused, comparing the China he imagined with the lively Taipei he knew even in those days.
Four years later he was himself living on the mainland, researching Shanghai nightclubs and the youth culture generally. He tells how he fell in love with a Chinese girl and three years later they were married.
Today he is an assistant professor of sociology at Tokyo's Sophia University, and this book is essentially a sociological look at Shanghai's sexual world. Many readers wondered after the publication of Wei Hui's Shanghai Baby if the city really boasted the sophisticated lifestyle and affluence so casually presented, even taken for granted, in that novel. This survey is a far more reliable guide to the truth of the matter than any work of fiction.
Openness about erotic matters -- one night stands, acceptance of premarital sex by women, and so on -- is clearly increasing on the evidence the book presents. But the percentage of the population involved in the clubbing culture it largely focuses on is, of course, in reality very small. Gays and lesbians are sometimes perceived, in Taipei and in Western cities, as having led the way in sexual honesty, even though in Taiwan they frequently see themselves as being unable to be completely "open." It is strange, therefore, that this large urban minority receives little coverage in Farrer's book. Perhaps he simply didn't know where to look. Opening Up is basically a work of scholarship, but because it contains extensive interview material with young Shanghainese about their sex lives it makes intriguing reading. And the University of Chicago Press is clearly anxious to market it as a book of general interest.
Variety is the over-riding impression the study conveys. There are stories of Western women who are amazed at the unending series of casual affairs they are able to experience, of local "playboys" who enjoy a status at disco pubs they can't hope to have during working hours, of slow romantic dances in near-darkness, head-shaking drug fads, dance-floor fights, and the expulsion from college of student couples when the girl becomes pregnant. No simple, single pattern emerges.
Relationships between Shanghai women and foreign men are discussed at some length. At one point the author lists several characteristics of such situations -- the introduction of a woman into the unfamiliar social circle of foreign men and their Chinese girlfriends, sex with no strings attached as typifying "foreign ways," the initial acceptance by the girl of a short-term relationship and then a break-up when she expresses hopes of a long-term one, and the perception of marriage to even an unsuitable foreigner as a quick route to emigration.
For many of both sexes, however, romance is more what they're looking for than sex as such. One group of informants tells the author that flowers, visits to coffee shops and special presents are more important than physical contact. "Romance" was a word that came to Shanghai only in the 1990s, someone asserts -- before then they didn't have anything like that. The older view was that something like "comfortable feeling" was what characterized ideal relations between the sexes.
It's impossible not to recognize some Taiwanese attitudes here, mixed in with other aspects of life that are unfamiliar. Even so, the perspective, from Taipei at least, feels for the most part like a view from a different world.
The author describes himself as having been "an inveterate participant in Shanghai's nightlife," visiting some type of club or disco two to four times a week during most of his stay. He also interviewed elementary schoolteachers who he taught for a semester in 1995, and these, as a "generally less sexually active group," offered a different and useful perspective against which to measure the others. He also interviewed magazine editors and fiction writers, and was helped on a daily basis by his mother-in-law who assiduously collected and filed newspaper clippings for him.
So, is Shanghai sexually "open"? The author's conclusion is, "Yes and no." And it's important to remember that, for all the relatively relaxed attitudes detected in this book, China is nonetheless still a place where Shanghai Baby was banned in the spring of 2000, less than three years ago.
For better or for worse, it seems, Shanghai, and China generally, are embracing Western patterns with more than a modicum of caution.
Taiwan’s English education system is being pulled apart by three opposing forces. Bilingual Nation 2030 pulls students toward English and global communication. Artificial Intelligence (AI) readiness pulls them toward digital judgment, verification and AI-mediated work. But Taiwan’s old exam culture pulls them back toward memorization, grammar drills, timed reading and correct answers. If the education system keeps using old exams to define success, it risks producing graduates who are neither genuinely bilingual nor genuinely AI-ready, but trained for tasks machines can already perform. The first force is Bilingual Nation 2030. Launched in 2018, the policy aimed to “help Taiwan’s workforce connect
It seems every few days one bumps into one of those “real man” comments in which Taiwan is urged to “face reality” or similar, and “make a deal,” with the speaker implying that soon it will be too late. “Deal” advocates always present themselves as having a superior grip on reality, and the manly ability to make the “hard choice.” Their testosterone-laden language often echoes that of Taiwan sellout advocates. Note that such commentary always specifies a process (“make a deal, work with, make progress”), never the end state of what occupation by a violent authoritarian colonialist state will entail. In
There are shadowy cabals plotting to sell out Taiwan to be annexed by China, by invasion if necessary. Fortunately, they are buffoons. In 2019, former Bamboo Union gangster and founder of the China Unification Promotion Party (CUPP), Chang An-le (張安樂, colorfully known as “White Wolf”), led a protest at the Legislative Yuan against comments made by then-premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) that in the event of an attack by China, he would never surrender, but would protect the nation by fighting to the end, even if he only had a broom. Chang had party members bring a wooden casket that they
June 1 to June 7 "If all Taiwanese were as afraid of dying as you, then what would happen?” Physician Shih Chiang-nan (施江南) reportedly said this to his wife Chen Chiao-tung (陳焦桐) after she urged him to stop intervening on behalf of Taiwanese soldiers stranded overseas after serving in the Japanese Army during World War II. Shih had clashed with high-ranking officials over the issue, engaged in several heated arguments with Taiwan governor-general Chen Yi (陳儀) and allegedly shouted at general Ko Yuan-fen (柯遠芬), chief of staff of the Taiwan Garrison Command, over
RSS